Puddle Jumper
Posts: 223
Dec 27, 2009 8:09pm
Cincy plays NY Jets @ 1
NE plays Houston @ 1
Pittsburgh plays Miami @ 1
No resting players for NE and Cincy as they are playing for the 3rd seed,so Pittsburgh could be sitting pretty come 4 o clock next Sunday.
NE plays Houston @ 1
Pittsburgh plays Miami @ 1
No resting players for NE and Cincy as they are playing for the 3rd seed,so Pittsburgh could be sitting pretty come 4 o clock next Sunday.
Non
Posts: 9,517
Dec 27, 2009 8:19pm
I just hope they don't use one of those games as flex schedule game.
Steelers need both the Bengals and Patriots to kick off at the same time so the No. 3 seed is still in doubt.
Steelers need both the Bengals and Patriots to kick off at the same time so the No. 3 seed is still in doubt.
C
capninsano
Posts: 411
Dec 27, 2009 8:33pm
Flex schedule has to be done two weeks ahead of time..so those will be the kickoff times.
As for the playoffs....A Pittsburgh win, Patriots over Texans, and Bengals over Jets.....hello playoffs. There is one other scenario (that I could come up with)....All things the same but the Jets beat the Bengals...then the Ravens would need to lose to Oakland as well for the Steelers to get in....Here's hoping to scenario uno.
Finally...Mason's "drop".....Tomlin went to challenge the play and the ref said this....."if you challenge the play I can tell you right now I won't overturn it" .... with the replay being showed about 10 times on the board.....and Mason clearly fumbling the ball...I don't know how he could say that. But...whatever....live to fight another game...go Steelers!
As for the playoffs....A Pittsburgh win, Patriots over Texans, and Bengals over Jets.....hello playoffs. There is one other scenario (that I could come up with)....All things the same but the Jets beat the Bengals...then the Ravens would need to lose to Oakland as well for the Steelers to get in....Here's hoping to scenario uno.
Finally...Mason's "drop".....Tomlin went to challenge the play and the ref said this....."if you challenge the play I can tell you right now I won't overturn it" .... with the replay being showed about 10 times on the board.....and Mason clearly fumbling the ball...I don't know how he could say that. But...whatever....live to fight another game...go Steelers!
Non
Posts: 9,517
Dec 27, 2009 8:36pm
The flex schedule for the final week can be made six days ahead of time.
It's an exception to the usual rule.
They'll probably decide tonight.
Philly vs. Dallas would be a possibility unless Dallas has appeared too many times on primetime. I think there is a rule about that.
It's an exception to the usual rule.
They'll probably decide tonight.
Philly vs. Dallas would be a possibility unless Dallas has appeared too many times on primetime. I think there is a rule about that.
bigdaddy2003
Posts: 7,384
Dec 27, 2009 8:53pm
Baltimore is a sorry ass franchise? Lol that's funny.
So I'm lost. The announcers of the Philly/Denver game said that if Denver lost then Baltimore and New York would be in the 2 wild card spots and they would be in control of their own destiny but I haven't read anybody talking like that on this thread. Who is right? lol
So I'm lost. The announcers of the Philly/Denver game said that if Denver lost then Baltimore and New York would be in the 2 wild card spots and they would be in control of their own destiny but I haven't read anybody talking like that on this thread. Who is right? lol
GoChiefs
Posts: 16,754
Dec 27, 2009 8:56pm
They are right..the Ravens and the Jets win..the Ravens and Jets will get the final 2 spots. Regardless of what the Steelers or the Broncos do. The Ravens and the Jets control their own destiny if I'm not mistaken.
C
capninsano
Posts: 411
Dec 27, 2009 8:58pm
They are right if BOTH of them win....but if not it's an either or thing then a million other factors come into play. Check out the yahoo playoff generator...it let's you tinker with who wins and what not to come up with the final playoff pairings.
C
capninsano
Posts: 411
Dec 27, 2009 9:00pm
Actually...they are correct...forget my previous post lol
bigdaddy2003
Posts: 7,384
Dec 27, 2009 9:01pm
Ha I wasn't directing that only to you. I didn't want you to think I was bad mouthing you. I was just confused lol.capninsano wrote: Actually...they are correct...forget my previous post lol
C
capninsano
Posts: 411
Dec 27, 2009 9:02pm
No worries...just trying to understand the whole damn thing...confusing as hell lol
Heretic
Posts: 18,820
Dec 27, 2009 9:04pm
Colts throwing the game to the Jets definitely didn't help. I don't know that I'd pick the Bengals to beat the Jets right now regardless of how much rests on them winning. They had just as much (more actually, as they hadn't clinched the division yet) riding on today's game and looked like they were sleepwalking against the Chiefs.
R
rock_knutne
Dec 27, 2009 9:05pm
Funny to you but it's reality, especially when you make a request to the league to not play a certain opponent away in prime time..........sorry and pathetic.bigdaddy2003 wrote: Baltimore is a sorry ass franchise? Lol that's funny.
killer_ewok
Posts: 11,379
Dec 27, 2009 9:06pm
You mean like the holding that you thought you saw? Yep, doesn't matter what you thought.....all that matters is what the refs thought. Thanks for bringing that up!Glory Days wrote:doesnt matter what it means to you, its what it means to the refs.killer_ewok wrote:Glory Days wrote:haha two steps dont mean anything. you need to make a "football move". and second, the announcers were a joke. they were wrong on several plays throughout the game.killer_ewok wrote:You mean like how it was clear that Mason had possession and took two steps? The announcers certainly thought it was a fumble. Lemme guess, Enberg and Fouts are Steeler fans too. LMAOGlory Days wrote:haha you can clearly see the steelers lineman pulling the ravens defender from behind on that last replay they showed.rock_knutne wrote:Please!Glory Days wrote: what about the holding while big ben was scrambling! haha they missed that one.
Two steps and striding forward sure seems like a "football move" to me.
bigdaddy2003
Posts: 7,384
Dec 27, 2009 9:06pm
When did that happen?rock_knutne wrote:Funny to you but it's reality, especially when you make a request to the league to not play a certain opponent away in prime time..........sorry and pathetic.bigdaddy2003 wrote: Baltimore is a sorry ass franchise? Lol that's funny.
GoChiefs
Posts: 16,754
Dec 27, 2009 9:11pm
Wanna talk about sorry? November 29, 2009..check out that team that lost to the sorry ass Ravens! Damn! They must be PATHETIC to lose to those sorry ass Ravens!rock_knutne wrote: Funny to you but it's reality, especially when you make a request to the league to not play a certain opponent away in prime time..........sorry and pathetic.
killer_ewok
Posts: 11,379
Dec 27, 2009 9:11pm
It was pretty public in the offseason. The NFL wanted to schedule the Ravens vs. the Steelers in Pittsburgh to open the season on that opening Thursday night. The Ravens requested to not be the Steelers opponent in that week 1 prime time game to kick off the season.bigdaddy2003 wrote:When did that happen?rock_knutne wrote:Funny to you but it's reality, especially when you make a request to the league to not play a certain opponent away in prime time..........sorry and pathetic.bigdaddy2003 wrote: Baltimore is a sorry ass franchise? Lol that's funny.
wes_mantooth
Posts: 17,977
Dec 27, 2009 9:12pm
^^^Why would it matter to the Ravens if it was prime time or not? I mean, it isn't like they still wouldn't have to play them twice.
killer_ewok
Posts: 11,379
Dec 27, 2009 9:13pm
You'd have to ask them that.wes_mantooth wrote: ^^^Why would it matter to the Ravens if it was prime time or not? I mean, it isn't like they still wouldn't have to play them twice.
GoChiefs
Posts: 16,754
Dec 27, 2009 9:14pm
Because they were skeered!!!wes_mantooth wrote: ^^^Why would it matter to the Ravens if it was prime time or not? I mean, it isn't like they still wouldn't have to play them twice.
wes_mantooth
Posts: 17,977
Dec 27, 2009 9:17pm
Yeah, that is strange. I mean, maybe they didn't want to get beat with national coverage, but that is just an odd request on their part.killer_ewok wrote:You'd have to ask them that.wes_mantooth wrote: ^^^Why would it matter to the Ravens if it was prime time or not? I mean, it isn't like they still wouldn't have to play them twice.
killer_ewok
Posts: 11,379
Dec 27, 2009 9:17pm
killer_ewok
Posts: 11,379
Dec 27, 2009 9:19pm
From what that link says the Ravens put in a scheduling request to the league because they didn't want to play a prime time game in Pittsburgh for a third straight year.
Shit, they got beat in broad daylight at Heinz Field today so I guess it really doesn't matter.
Shit, they got beat in broad daylight at Heinz Field today so I guess it really doesn't matter.
.jpg)
september63
Posts: 5,789
Dec 27, 2009 9:21pm
Either way, the Ravens control their own destiny and Pitts doesnt. Doesnt matter how you shake the terrible towel!
killer_ewok
Posts: 11,379
Dec 27, 2009 9:24pm
Yeah, that's true. But at least we made them wait a week and now they've got to work for it.september63 wrote: Either way, the Ravens control their own destiny and Pitts doesnt. Doesnt matter how you shake the terrible towel!
september63
Posts: 5,789
Dec 27, 2009 9:28pm
Ive previousy said, Ill pull for Pitts. Its sad the NYJ control their own destiny. Pitts woulld beat them by 10 if they played anywhere next week!!