Disgusted with Obama disgusted with Obama disgusted with Obama


\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ echoing to the true believers.

Yes...Obamaconomy going strong. 4 more years....CAN'T WAIT!!!!

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/11/21/Surprise-PA-College-Slashes-Hours-To-Avoid-Obamacare



Once again, liberalism generates the exact opposite of its stated intent.


Change we can believe in...

QuakerOats;1327190 wrote:http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/11/21/Surprise-PA-College-Slashes-Hours-To-Avoid-Obamacare



Once again, liberalism generates the exact opposite of its stated intent.


Change we can believe in...

gosh a ruddies, it is deja vu. I have the strange feeling I just read the exact same thing on another thread, wow.

I, for one, appreciate Obama. I just bought a house for 168,000 that the old owner paid 205,000 for about 4 years ago. Thanks Barry.

ccrunner609;1327383 wrote:but the problem is that it will be worth 148,000 when he is done

It's a long term investment.

Quaker, you are continuing to welch on the bet you agreed to. What's the deal?

James Gatz;1327489 wrote:Quaker, you are continuing to welch on the bet you agreed to. What's the deal?

Hello Jim,

Do I have a bet with you?

Please advise.

'Oats

QuakerOats;1327514 wrote:Hello Jim,

Do I have a bet with you?

Please advise.

'Oats

.........

2kool4skool;1275196 wrote:I will make a wager with you. If Romney wins, I will PayPal you 1,000 USD. If Obama wins, you get a vasectomy so you can never reproduce again.

QuakerOats;1275215 wrote:Deal.

Thanks Jim, not to worry, I don't make babies I cannot afford to take care of, thereby placing undue burden on you and others. In fact, I am subsidizing others who do partake in such activity because liberals like the ones on here advocate the confiscation of a large portion of my productive labor in order to promote such behavior. I think it is part of obama's fundamental transformation of AmeriKa -- isn't it great?

QuakerOats;1275130 wrote:It is over ......... for obama. He was going to lose anyway, but sealed it with his "You didn't build it" quip. It is quite telling that in highly scientific polling in Ohio's 6th district, a poor district, if you will, obama is getting his arse kicked by very signficiant magins. Given that, there is simply no way he can win. He has lost votes from every single demographic.

But hey, believe what you want.

:thumbup:


I believe you are a welcher and an idiot. Pay up, or shut up.

Devils Advocate;1329672 wrote::thumbup:


I believe you are a welcher and an idiot. Pay up, or shut up.

Pretty much what the Feds will be telling us in January.

believer;1329798 wrote:Pretty much what the Feds will be telling us in January.

Naw... They'll just print more money.

Devils Advocate;1329802 wrote:Naw... They'll just print more money.

True. Fire up the presses. Time for some quantitative easing.

[h=3]Study: EPA Regulations To Cost Pennsylvania Manufacturers $1.5 Billion.[/h]Lehigh Valley Business (11/29, Pedersen) reported, "The Northeast PA Manufacturers & Employers Association of Pottsville and the National Association of Manufacturers released a new study by the advisory firm ndp|consulting on Nov. 28 which examines the impact of several Environmental Protection Agency regulations on Pennsylvania's economy." The "study finds that the annual compliance costs of the EPA's proposed Utility Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT), Boiler Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) and Coal Combustion Residuals regulations on Pennsylvania will be $1.5 billion." The "impact of EPA's Utility MACT, Boiler MACT and Coal Combustion Residuals regulations on Pennsylvania, include: annual compliance costs: $1.5 billion; annual manufacturing sector compliance costs: $651.6 million; total upfront capital expenditures to comply: $8.9 billion;" and total "manufacturing sector upfront capital expenditures: $3.7 billion." According to the study, "the cumulative impact of the EPA's proposed regulations nationwide could cost roughly $100 billion annually and more than 2 million jobs."



Change we can believe in ....

Today's selected headlines:

White House opposed new Iran sanctions...

STUDY: American Households Hit 43-Year Low In Net Worth...

Debt Hits $16,306,713,000,000...

ANGRY SANDY VICTIMS SLAM FEMA...

Feds spend $100k teaching teen girls 'condom negotiation'...

UPDATE: EGYPT ISLAMISTS HURRIEDLY APPROVE NEW CONSTITUTION...

Liberals, leftists, Christians, moderate Muslims withdrew before vote...

Retains Islamic law as main source of legislation...

No equal rights for women; owning slaves not banned...

selected headline

Obama wins second term, Fox News projects
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/11/06/obama-romney-wind-down-campaigns-as-voters-make-their-choice/

QuakerOats;1333620 wrote:Study: EPA Regulations To Cost Pennsylvania Manufacturers $1.5 Billion.

Lehigh Valley Business (11/29, Pedersen) reported, "The Northeast PA Manufacturers & Employers Association of Pottsville and the National Association of Manufacturers released a new study by the advisory firm ndp|consulting on Nov. 28 which examines the impact of several Environmental Protection Agency regulations on Pennsylvania's economy." The "study finds that the annual compliance costs of the EPA's proposed Utility Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT), Boiler Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) and Coal Combustion Residuals regulations on Pennsylvania will be $1.5 billion." The "impact of EPA's Utility MACT, Boiler MACT and Coal Combustion Residuals regulations on Pennsylvania, include: annual compliance costs: $1.5 billion; annual manufacturing sector compliance costs: $651.6 million; total upfront capital expenditures to comply: $8.9 billion;" and total "manufacturing sector upfront capital expenditures: $3.7 billion." According to the study, "the cumulative impact of the EPA's proposed regulations nationwide could cost roughly $100 billion annually and more than 2 million jobs."



Change we can believe in ....

If it helps keep the air clean, I am fine with it.

ptown_trojans_1;1333994 wrote:If it helps keep the air clean, I am fine with it.

Translates to: As long as it doesn't impact my checkbook, I'm fine with it.

believer;1334011 wrote:Translates to: As long as it doesn't impact my checkbook, I'm fine with it.

I'd gladly pay a little more to help keep the air clean.
Sorry, I do not want to have air like China.

breathing is terribly overrated.

ptown_trojans_1;1334042 wrote:I'd gladly pay a little more to help keep the air clean.
Sorry, I do not want to have air like China.

You apparently just want the Chinese to have the jobs.

Seriously, the environmental laws already in place in this country are more than sufficient to keep us from having "air like China." Why does the EPA keep piling on over-regulation to the very industries that keep what's left of our economy humming?

It's amazing how all of you well-paid with cushy bennies Beltway boyz are all about the chicken little nonsense just as long as you get to keep your taxpayer-based jobs. :rolleyes:

REPORT: Obama wants stimulus spending to offset 'drag on economy from Obama's proposed tax increases'...

'Classic bait and switch'...

ptown_trojans_1;1333994 wrote:If it helps keep the air clean, I am fine with it.

Hilarious. I suppose if it saves one life we shouldn't drive cars.


You have truly drank the k-aid

QuakerOats;1334208 wrote:REPORT: Obama wants stimulus spending to offset 'drag on economy from Obama's proposed tax increases'...

'Classic bait and switch'...

If the unemployment benefits aren't extended there's going to be a lot of Obama voters wondering WTF happened to Santa.