Post your favorite political memes/cartoons/etc.

Home Archive Politics Post your favorite political memes/cartoons/etc.
justincredible's avatar

justincredible

Nick Mangold

32,056 posts
Sep 30, 2013 10:10 PM
I don't have time to waste on dumb shit like this.
Sep 30, 2013 10:10pm
O-Trap's avatar

O-Trap

Chief Shenanigans Officer

14,994 posts
Oct 1, 2013 2:43 AM
Oct 1, 2013 2:43am
believer's avatar

believer

Senior Member

8,153 posts
Oct 1, 2013 5:23 AM
Oct 1, 2013 5:23am
Devils Advocate's avatar

Devils Advocate

Brudda o da bomber

4,539 posts
Oct 1, 2013 6:04 AM
QuakerOats;1510118 wrote:Catholics have done more Little kids in the butt than all others combined.

And my shit is getting real old.
Finally, common ground.



Reposted for thread integrity. Since my constitutional tights seen to have been abridged by the moderation staff.
Oct 1, 2013 6:04am
Devils Advocate's avatar

Devils Advocate

Brudda o da bomber

4,539 posts
Oct 1, 2013 6:07 AM
justincredible;1510312 wrote:I don't have time to waste on dumb shit like this.

It's your monster Dr Frankenstien. Deal with it.

Oct 1, 2013 6:07am
Devils Advocate's avatar

Devils Advocate

Brudda o da bomber

4,539 posts
Oct 1, 2013 6:14 AM
justincredible;1510312 wrote:I don't have time to waste on dumb shit like this.

It's your monster Dr Frankenstien. Deal with it.
Oct 1, 2013 6:14am
ernest_t_bass's avatar

ernest_t_bass

12th Son of the Lama

24,984 posts
Oct 1, 2013 9:53 AM
O-Trap;1510389 wrote:
What exactly would you call this tactic? Does it have a name? Not just yelling racist, but saying asinine shit in general. I HATE arguing with people who do this, b/c they think they "win" an argument, only by saying the most asinine shit, to which it's pointless to offer rebuttal.
Oct 1, 2013 9:53am
Devils Advocate's avatar

Devils Advocate

Brudda o da bomber

4,539 posts
Oct 1, 2013 10:04 AM
ernest_t_bass;1510473 wrote:What exactly would you call this tactic? Does it have a name? Not just yelling racist, but saying asinine shit in general. I HATE arguing with people who do this, b/c they think they "win" an argument, only by saying the most asinine shit, to which it's pointless to offer rebuttal.
Yes. Exactly like Quacker posts. And when somebody suggests another opinion on the subject, you scream yell and bitch that the offending post be deleted.
Oct 1, 2013 10:04am
Q

QuakerOats

Senior Member

8,740 posts
Oct 1, 2013 10:58 AM
You did not suggest another opinion, you attempted to attribute another opinion to someone else by falsifying a post they made. There is no 'constitutional right' to impugning others by altering their written words; in fact it is illegal to do so. Hence, post # 1040 must come down also.

You can make all the vile posts you want (apparently), but you can't attribute them to others.
Oct 1, 2013 10:58am
Heretic's avatar

Heretic

Son of the Sun

18,820 posts
Oct 1, 2013 11:19 AM
QuakerOats;1510283 wrote:you have a pm.
And you have a sandy vagina.
Oct 1, 2013 11:19am
justincredible's avatar

justincredible

Nick Mangold

32,056 posts
Oct 1, 2013 11:31 AM
QuakerOats;1510520 wrote:You did not suggest another opinion, you attempted to attribute another opinion to someone else by falsifying a post they made. There is no 'constitutional right' to impugning others by altering their written words; in fact it is illegal to do so. Hence, post # 1040 must come down also.

You can make all the vile posts you want (apparently), but you can't attribute them to others.
He did not change or alter your written words. Your original post is unaltered. But, again, I don't have time for stupid shit like this.
Oct 1, 2013 11:31am
justincredible's avatar

justincredible

Nick Mangold

32,056 posts
Oct 1, 2013 11:36 AM
Btw, I am not liable for what other people post on the site so your threats sent to O-Trap (not me, for some reason) are absurd.
Under 47 U.S.C. sec. 230(c)(1): "No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider." This provision has been uniformly interpreted by the Courts to provide complete protection against defamation or libel claims made against an ISP, message board or chat room where the statements are made by third parties.
Oct 1, 2013 11:36am
Q

queencitybuckeye

Senior Member

7,117 posts
Oct 1, 2013 11:36 AM
QuakerOats;1510520 wrote:You did not suggest another opinion, you attempted to attribute another opinion to someone else by falsifying a post they made. There is no 'constitutional right' to impugning others by altering their written words; in fact it is illegal to do so. Hence, post # 1040 must come down also.

You can make all the vile posts you want (apparently), but you can't attribute them to others.
You don't "own" the words you post here, Justin does. Not that he wants them unless he collects stupid.
Oct 1, 2013 11:36am
Devils Advocate's avatar

Devils Advocate

Brudda o da bomber

4,539 posts
Oct 1, 2013 11:41 AM
justincredible;1510564 wrote:Btw, I am not liable for what other people post on the site so your threats sent to O-Trap (not me, for some reason) are absurd.
Uh Ohhhhh... Here come the Certified letter.
Oct 1, 2013 11:41am
ernest_t_bass's avatar

ernest_t_bass

12th Son of the Lama

24,984 posts
Oct 1, 2013 1:21 PM
Is quaker really that stoopid?
Oct 1, 2013 1:21pm
TedSheckler's avatar

TedSheckler

Emporium Entrepreneur

3,974 posts
Oct 1, 2013 2:10 PM
These are all fascinating memes.
Oct 1, 2013 2:10pm
justincredible's avatar

justincredible

Nick Mangold

32,056 posts
Oct 1, 2013 2:13 PM
TedSheckler;1510659 wrote:These are all fascinating memes.
This one, especially.
Oct 1, 2013 2:13pm
O-Trap's avatar

O-Trap

Chief Shenanigans Officer

14,994 posts
Oct 1, 2013 2:16 PM
ernest_t_bass;1510473 wrote:What exactly would you call this tactic? Does it have a name? Not just yelling racist, but saying asinine shit in general. I HATE arguing with people who do this, b/c they think they "win" an argument, only by saying the most asinine shit, to which it's pointless to offer rebuttal.
At first glance, it appears to be ad hominem. By labeling someone a racist, you're attacking the claimant, but not the logical accuracy and consistency of the claim.
QuakerOats;1510520 wrote:You did not suggest another opinion, you attempted to attribute another opinion to someone else by falsifying a post they made. There is no 'constitutional right' to impugning others by altering their written words; in fact it is illegal to do so. Hence, post # 1040 must come down also.

You can make all the vile posts you want (apparently), but you can't attribute them to others.
Actually, I consulted an attorney over this specific example. Because there is no documented expectation of legal accuracy, this is as prosecutable as lying to your wife about what your mother said about her. Written-versus-oral statements are the only real distinction.
justincredible;1510564 wrote:Btw, I am not liable for what other people post on the site so your threats sent to O-Trap (not me, for some reason) are absurd.
You don't need to expend time on this. QO is throwing a hissy fit and trying to write checks he can't cash. You don't owe him a response. If he wants to try to pursue legal matters, let him figure it out on his own dime.
queencitybuckeye;1510568 wrote:You don't "own" the words you post here, Justin does. Not that he wants them unless he collects stupid.
Best post in over a page. Will rep
Devils Advocate;1510573 wrote:Uh Ohhhhh... Here come the Certified letter.
Honestly, I doubt any lawyer out there would even try to take this.
Oct 1, 2013 2:16pm
justincredible's avatar

justincredible

Nick Mangold

32,056 posts
Oct 1, 2013 2:43 PM
Oct 1, 2013 2:43pm
justincredible's avatar

justincredible

Nick Mangold

32,056 posts
Oct 1, 2013 2:56 PM
Oct 1, 2013 2:56pm
I

I Wear Pants

Senior Member

16,223 posts
Oct 1, 2013 7:11 PM
Lol was legal action seriously being considered?

Anyway, back to the memes...

Oct 1, 2013 7:11pm
G

gut

Senior Member

15,058 posts
Oct 1, 2013 7:49 PM
Oct 1, 2013 7:49pm
justincredible's avatar

justincredible

Nick Mangold

32,056 posts
Oct 1, 2013 7:57 PM
I Wear Pants;1510822 wrote:Lol was legal action seriously being considered?
It was threatened. But not to me directly. Apparently O-Trap is my proxy.
Oct 1, 2013 7:57pm
O-Trap's avatar

O-Trap

Chief Shenanigans Officer

14,994 posts
Oct 1, 2013 8:04 PM
justincredible;1510836 wrote:It was threatened. But not to me directly. Apparently O-Trap is my proxy.
Which sucks, by the way.
Oct 1, 2013 8:04pm
I

I Wear Pants

Senior Member

16,223 posts
Oct 1, 2013 8:20 PM
Taking serious business to new levels.
Oct 1, 2013 8:20pm