cruiser_96
Posts: 7,536
Nov 4, 2012 9:25pm
Wouldn't it be more accurate to say "Reception Interference"?
Ironman92
Posts: 49,363
Nov 4, 2012 10:08pm
Yes
and
Voted
and
Voted
hasbeen
Posts: 6,504
Nov 4, 2012 10:23pm
No.
Iliketurtles
Posts: 8,191
Nov 4, 2012 10:25pm
No.
cruiser_96
Posts: 7,536
Nov 5, 2012 7:40am
Is your asnswer "No." because I asked the question?hasbeen;1312821 wrote:No.
C
Con_Alma
Posts: 12,198
Nov 5, 2012 8:37am
I like how you think cruiser.
Pass interference is short for pass play interference. You are interfering with the pass play...directly the receiver that's in the pass play.
The one that's even more entertaining to is when an official states, " Before the snap, fall start." As if there's any other time you can false start.
Pass interference is short for pass play interference. You are interfering with the pass play...directly the receiver that's in the pass play.
The one that's even more entertaining to is when an official states, " Before the snap, fall start." As if there's any other time you can false start.
cruiser_96
Posts: 7,536
Nov 5, 2012 9:54am
Ha! Good one, Con. The False Start one is a bit redundant. ...and it repeats itself.
hasbeen
Posts: 6,504
Nov 5, 2012 9:56am
Partially. Also, Pass Interference is the correct name.cruiser_96;1312945 wrote:Is your asnswer "No." because I asked the question?
I usually hear them say "Prior to the snap". Still redundant though.Con_Alma;1312981 wrote:I like how you think cruiser.
Pass interference is short for pass play interference. You are interfering with the pass play...directly the receiver that's in the pass play.
The one that's even more entertaining to is when an official states, " Before the snap, fall start." As if there's any other time you can false start.
C
Con_Alma
Posts: 12,198
Nov 5, 2012 10:00am
In addition, by designating it prior to the snap makes it a dead-ball penalty and it can't be declined.hasbeen;1313047 wrote:Partially. Also, Pass Interference is the correct name.
I usually hear them say "Prior to the snap". Still redundant though.
It simply sounds, silly.
cruiser_96
Posts: 7,536
Nov 5, 2012 10:01am
So, interfering with the pass is a penalty???
Someone tell the Texans JJ Watt!
Someone tell the Texans JJ Watt!
V
vball10set
Posts: 24,795
Nov 5, 2012 10:03am
lol--repscruiser_96;1313051 wrote:So, interfering with the pass is a penalty???
Someone tell the Texans JJ Watt!
C
Con_Alma
Posts: 12,198
Nov 5, 2012 10:03am
Not coming from an official but rather coaches and analysts, I hate whenpeople say to catch the ball at it's highest point. It can't be done.
It should be stated as catching the ball at your highest point.
It should be stated as catching the ball at your highest point.
cruiser_96
Posts: 7,536
Nov 5, 2012 10:17am
Exaclty. Hence, "Reception Interference!"Con_Alma;1313055 wrote:...
It should be stated as catching the ball at your highest point.
C
Con_Alma
Posts: 12,198
Nov 5, 2012 10:24am
Lol
You are persistent...as only a 4 time sectional qualifier can be.
You are persistent...as only a 4 time sectional qualifier can be.
BORIStheCrusher
Posts: 1,893
Nov 5, 2012 10:30am
I've never understood the "loss of down" on intentional grounding. What down do they lose?
cruiser_96
Posts: 7,536
Nov 5, 2012 10:30am
C
Con_Alma
Posts: 12,198
Nov 5, 2012 10:32am
That play that the penalty occurred in. Most penalties when accepted have a yardage penalty assessed and then the down is repeated. That's not the case with intentional grounding. The down counts and has been played. You don't get to repeat it. You lose it.BORIStheCrusher;1313093 wrote:I've never understood the "loss of down" on intentional grounding. What down do they lose?
Laley23
Posts: 29,506
Nov 5, 2012 10:36am
Well, doesnt every other penalty negate the play? I think grounding is the only penalty where you have the penalty and loss the play/down.BORIStheCrusher;1313093 wrote:I've never understood the "loss of down" on intentional grounding. What down do they lose?
BORIStheCrusher
Posts: 1,893
Nov 5, 2012 10:39am
I get, it just seems like an odd way to put it I guess since most of the time it isn't all that different than the qb getting sacked.Con_Alma;1313097 wrote:That play that the penalty occurred in. Most penalties when accepted have a yardage penalty assessed and then the down is repeated. That's not the case with intentional grounding. The down counts and has been played. You don't get to repeat it. You lose it.
S
Sonofanump
Nov 5, 2012 2:53pm
LULZ. I'll bite.
S
Sonofanump
Nov 5, 2012 2:56pm
CloseCon_Alma;1312981 wrote:I like how you think cruiser.
Pass interference is short for pass play interference. You are interfering with the pass play...directly the receiver that's in the pass play.
It is either "offensive or defensive pass interfence" that occurrs during a legal pass play.
S
Sonofanump
Nov 5, 2012 2:57pm
There exist two types of false start. One before the snap, the other is a player never setting in position for a second before the snap occurrs and that foul only becomes a foul at the snap.Con_Alma;1312981 wrote:The one that's even more entertaining to is when an official states, " Before the snap, fall start." As if there's any other time you can false start.
T
thavoice
Posts: 14,376
Nov 5, 2012 2:59pm
HS offensive pass interferance was, and I think still, is a loss of down as well! It is a KILLE penalty.Laley23;1313100 wrote:Well, doesnt every other penalty negate the play? I think grounding is the only penalty where you have the penalty and loss the play/down.
I kinda get why grounding is also a loss of down. It is called when they determine the QB threw it way to NOT get sacked...and of course in the tackle box...so instead of just the penalty and replay they get the second whammy with the loss of down becuase if he hadnt committed that penalty that down was used up anyways.
S
Sonofanump
Nov 5, 2012 3:00pm
NCAA- Illegal kicking, batting (except backwards pass still in the air), handing a ball forward beyond the line of scrimmage, illegal touching of a forward pass by a play who has gone out of bounds on his own, illegal forward pass beyond the line of scrimmage, planned loose ball play (Nebraska Rule), intentionally throwing the ball backwards out of bounds to conserve time.Laley23;1313100 wrote:Well, doesnt every other penalty negate the play? I think grounding is the only penalty where you have the penalty and loss the play/down.
NFHS- Add OPI.</SPAN>
S
Sonofanump
Nov 5, 2012 3:02pm
It should be more technically called "The loss of the right to replay the down".BORIStheCrusher;1313093 wrote:I've never understood the "loss of down" on intentional grounding. What down do they lose?