sleeper
Posts: 27,879
Nov 7, 2012 11:13pm
Good to know you voted for Bush.isadore;1315641 wrote:gosh a ruddies, kerry was a loser, gore had the most people voting for him. he got cheated.
password
Posts: 2,360
Nov 7, 2012 11:14pm
Mrs. Obama will be running in 2016, take it to the bank.
W
WebFire
Posts: 14,779
Nov 8, 2012 8:17am
Ever here the quote "Better to keep your mouth closed and be thought a fool than to open it and remove all doubt"?isadore;1315630 wrote:gosh a ruddies we smart people knew our candidate, our first African American President, was going to win. The less smart, a euphemism for stupid, people thought their candidate Mitt Romney would win, you were wrong. Gosh it was a stupid decision to support him, a loser.
S
Sonofanump
Nov 8, 2012 8:30am
This thread is worthless, no election will be had in 2016 under the socialist dictatorship of the current regime. If an election does take place, it will be just a walk through after term limits are abolished.
rmolin73
Posts: 4,278
Nov 8, 2012 8:45am
Hahahaha hilarious!Sonofanump;1315729 wrote:This thread is worthless, no election will be had in 2016 under the socialist dictatorship of the current regime. If an election does take place, it will be just a walk through after term limits are abolished.
I
isadore
Posts: 7,762
Nov 8, 2012 8:47am
but gosh a ruddies you keep talking, wow. you know what you inflict your views on our nation. of course they have been rejected by the American people. but reading your views does help drive people to Barack Obama.WebFire;1315720 wrote:Ever here the quote "Better to keep your mouth closed and be thought a fool than to open it and remove all doubt"?
W
WebFire
Posts: 14,779
Nov 8, 2012 8:56am
Gullible much?isadore;1315739 wrote:but gosh a ruddies you keep talking, wow. you know what you inflict your views on our nation. of course they have been rejected by the American people. but reading your views does help drive people to Barack Obama.
I
isadore
Posts: 7,762
Nov 8, 2012 9:05am
gullible is believing that the Republican party actually cares about average working people in this country.WebFire;1315744 wrote:Gullible much?
justincredible
Posts: 32,056
Nov 8, 2012 9:08am
Indeed.isadore;1315751 wrote:gullible is believing that the Democratic party actually cares about average working people in this country.
I
isadore
Posts: 7,762
Nov 8, 2012 9:19am
obviously you have spent to much time in front of a computer screen so that you are unable to recognize compassion, caring and tolerance for those Americans who do not happen to be in the 1%. The Democratic party, the party of the people as this election has shown.justincredible;1315753 wrote:Indeed.
rmolin73
Posts: 4,278
Nov 8, 2012 9:22am
Maybe if the party of "no" will show up and vote in 2016 they may have a chance. Most of them stayed home in 2012 becoming the party of "no show".
W
WebFire
Posts: 14,779
Nov 8, 2012 9:34am
Yes Obama cares so much that the average workers health insurance will rise to unprecedented cost. Thanks!isadore;1315751 wrote:gullible is believing that the Republican party actually cares about average working people in this country.
I
isadore
Posts: 7,762
Nov 8, 2012 9:39am
gosh a ruddies what he has done is make sure more Americans will have medical coverage, something Republicans are obviously indifferent to.WebFire;1315764 wrote:Yes Obama cares so much that the average workers health insurance will rise to unprecedented cost. Thanks!
justincredible
Posts: 32,056
Nov 8, 2012 9:44am
Perhaps if the govt got the fuck out of the health care industry it would be affordable for everyone.isadore;1315768 wrote:gosh a ruddies what he has done is make sure more Americans will have medical coverage, something Republicans are obviously indifferent to.
I
isadore
Posts: 7,762
Nov 8, 2012 9:51am
only in the fantasy land of free market healthcare where the poor will not need to live and breath.justincredible;1315773 wrote:Perhaps if the govt got the **** out of the health care industry it would be affordable for everyone.
W
WebFire
Posts: 14,779
Nov 8, 2012 10:33am
Only in fantasy land (or socialism land, your choice) do we have the money to give everyone healthcare. And gov't being in healthcare usually doesn't mean good healthcare.isadore;1315782 wrote:only in the fantasy land of free market healthcare where the poor will not need to live and breath.
I
isadore
Posts: 7,762
Nov 8, 2012 10:55am
gosh a ruddies nations like norway, sweden, denmark, netherlands, germany, canada all seem to be able to provided medical care for their citizens, we should be able to do it.WebFire;1315824 wrote:Only in fantasy land (or socialism land, your choice) do we have the money to give everyone healthcare. And gov't being in healthcare usually doesn't mean good healthcare.
G
gut
Posts: 15,058
Nov 8, 2012 10:59am
It helps with the US subsidizing the R&D costs.isadore;1315846 wrote:gosh a ruddies nations like norway, sweden, denmark, netherlands, germany, canada all seem to be able to provided medical care for their citizens, we should be able to do it.
W
WebFire
Posts: 14,779
Nov 8, 2012 11:14am
SMHisadore;1315846 wrote:gosh a ruddies nations like norway, sweden, denmark, netherlands, germany, canada all seem to be able to provided medical care for their citizens, we should be able to do it.
S
Sonofanump
Nov 8, 2012 11:22am
Derp, that is why foreigners come to the US for treatment. Does the Saudi Price fly to Norway or Germany for his treatment? Gosh a ruddies no.isadore;1315846 wrote:gosh a ruddies nations like norway, sweden, denmark, netherlands, germany, canada all seem to be able to provided medical care for their citizens, we should be able to do it.
I
isadore
Posts: 7,762
Nov 8, 2012 12:38pm
gosh a ruddies I don't know about "the Saudi Price" but i do know the average German or Norwegian lives longer than the average American. I know a baby born in Germany or Norway has a better chance of survival than one born in the United States. In both countries better care at a lower cost.Sonofanump;1315873 wrote:Derp, that is why foreigners come to the US for treatment. Does the Saudi Price fly to Norway or Germany for his treatment? Gosh a ruddies no.
I
isadore
Posts: 7,762
Nov 8, 2012 12:40pm
gosh a ruddies we must be pretty stupid for doing that because of how our government allows drug companies and others to rip us off.gut;1315849 wrote:It helps with the US subsidizing the R&D costs.
G
gut
Posts: 15,058
Nov 8, 2012 12:51pm
Yeah, that's what it means to subsidize something. They make their profit in the US because they're squeezed elsewhere by these nationalized plans.isadore;1315922 wrote:gosh a ruddies we must be pretty stupid for doing that because of how our government allows drug companies and others to rip us off.
What that ultimately means is, yes, you'll be able to get "affordable" treatment, there just won't be any good drugs to treat you with because there's no money in it. They've already been chopping R&D investment for years and Obamakare will only make that worse.
I
isadore
Posts: 7,762
Nov 8, 2012 1:29pm
no it would mean they would have to spread the cost around more evenly to other nations rather than inflict it only on Americans.gut;1315934 wrote:Yeah, that's what it means to subsidize something. They make their profit in the US because they're squeezed elsewhere by these nationalized plans.
What that ultimately means is, yes, you'll be able to get "affordable" treatment, there just won't be any good drugs to treat you with because there's no money in it. They've already been chopping R&D investment for years and Obamakare will only make that worse.
S
Sonofanump
Nov 8, 2012 3:48pm
Tell me moar!isadore;1315973 wrote:no it would mean they would have to spread the cost around more evenly rather than inflicted on Americans.