Archive 11/3: #4 Notre Dame (8-0) vs. Pittsburgh (4-4) [3:30 NBC]

sleeper

Posts: 27,879

Nov 3, 2012 7:52pm

The Equalizer;1311550 wrote:I don't go on other team's threads and stir the shit. When people come onto this thread to do it, then get the shit shoved down their throats when we pull out a W, they get what they get.

I think the people you are talking about are getting the better end of the deal; it took ND 3 OTs to beat Pitt, who is one of the worst teams in college football.

V

vball10set

Posts: 24,795

Nov 3, 2012 7:52pm

Tiger2003;1311551 wrote:I told you to shut the hell up. You call yourself a ND fan an you shut the game off. GTFO

reps!

Tiger2003

Posts: 15,421

Nov 3, 2012 7:53pm

The Equalizer;1311554 wrote:^case in point

edit: not vball

Case in point?

Case in point you turned the game off?

S

sjmvsfscs08

Posts: 2,963

Nov 3, 2012 7:54pm

ND yards: 522
Pitt yars: 308

ND first downs: 34
Pitt first downs: 13

ND time of possession: 35min
Pitt time of possession: 24min

Who would've thought?

The Equalizer

Posts: 1,003

Nov 3, 2012 7:58pm

I will take a close win over a first loss anytime. I dont care who it's against. We're still in the picture and we have to trust that the players will use this as a wake up call and get back into last week's form. No amount of whining or complaining or "you had to fight to beat Pitt!" will change that. You were in a ballgame against the dreaded juggernaut indiana. It happens.

LJ

Posts: 16,351

Nov 3, 2012 8:00pm

The Equalizer;1311569 wrote:I will take a close win over a first loss anytime. I dont care who it's against. We're still in the picture and we have to trust that the players will use this as a wake up call and get back into last week's form. No amount of whining or complaining or "you had to fight to beat Pitt!" will change that. You were in a ballgame against the dreaded juggernaut indiana. It happens.

Indiana scored junk td's at the end of a game where they were down 20 points

Tiger2003

Posts: 15,421

Nov 3, 2012 8:00pm

The Equalizer;1311569 wrote:I will take a close win over a first loss anytime. I dont care who it's against. We're still in the picture and we have to trust that the players will use this as a wake up call and get back into last week's form. No amount of whining or complaining or "you had to fight to beat Pitt!" will change that. You were in a ballgame against the dreaded juggernaut indiana. It happens.

But I didn't turn the game off. I watched the whole Indiana vs OSU game. I didn't turn it off when it got close.

The Equalizer

Posts: 1,003

Nov 3, 2012 8:02pm

Yea, your team didn't play up to its standards and let an inferior opponent make it a game which you had to finally put away. Same thing tonight.

---

Good for you and the neilson ratings. I'm still drinkin happy.

LJ

Posts: 16,351

Nov 3, 2012 8:03pm

The Equalizer;1311579 wrote:Yea, your team didn't play up to its standards and let an inferior opponent make it a game which you had to finally put away. Same thing tonight.

---

Good for you and the neilson ratings. I'm still drinkin happy.

Who are you talking to? Use the damn quote feature

Tiger2003

Posts: 15,421

Nov 3, 2012 8:04pm

The Equalizer;1311579 wrote:I'm still drinkin happy.

I'm happy for you.

Tiger2003

Posts: 15,421

Nov 3, 2012 8:05pm

LJ;1311580 wrote:Who are you talking to? Use the damn quote feature

He's talking to me.

The Equalizer

Posts: 1,003

Nov 3, 2012 8:05pm

Separated the comments with the --, you on top, the other guy on the bottom.

And I'm sorry, I must have mistaken CFB for politics where you get to tell people what to do.

Crimson streak

Posts: 9,002

Nov 3, 2012 8:05pm

The Equalizer;1311579 wrote:Yea, your team didn't play up to its standards and let an inferior opponent make it a game which you had to finally put away. Same thing tonight.

---

Good for you and the neilson ratings. I'm still drinkin happy.

I'm drinking happy tonight too. Just keep winning things will take care of themselves and if they don't they don't

Tiger2003

Posts: 15,421

Nov 3, 2012 8:06pm

Well have a great night fellas. Congrats to the true ND fans on a 9-0 start. Like I have stated before its good for college football when ND is good.

The Equalizer

Posts: 1,003

Nov 3, 2012 8:07pm

Night Tiger, have a good one.

LJ

Posts: 16,351

Nov 3, 2012 8:09pm

The Equalizer;1311584 wrote:Separated the comments with the --, you on top, the other guy on the bottom.

And I'm sorry, I must have mistaken CFB for politics where you get to tell people what to do.

I don't care what forum this is. I can't stand people that don't use the quote. It's stupid not to and it is a pain in the ass to read.

As for the Indiana game. I was never worried. If you wanted a to have a real argument, you would talk about OSU having to score in the final seconds and get a 2 point conversion to get to OT with Purdue. But nah, you just saw the Indiana score at one point so you decided to go with that.

Look, ND is undefeated, maybe you should worry about that, and not worry about other teams. I came in to make fun of Pitt, yet I then see some ND fan start bashing on OSU. Why did you need to bring up OSU? Because of Sleeper? Really?

The Equalizer

Posts: 1,003

Nov 3, 2012 8:13pm

I dont really give a fuck what grinds your gears

I would rank purdue as a better team than indiana and put pitt on par with IU so I went with that analogy in showing good teams can have subpar nights that need saving.

Not just because of sleeper but I'd be lying if I said I'm not enjoying that he didnt get the ending he wanted. He wasn't the only one in here for the sole purpose of rubbing in a bad game and now they got a little back.

LJ

Posts: 16,351

Nov 3, 2012 8:17pm

The Equalizer;1311593 wrote:I dont really give a fuck what grinds your gears

I would rank purdue as a better team than indiana and put pitt on par with IU so I went with that analogy in showing good teams can have subpar nights that need saving.

Not just because of sleeper but I'd be lying if I said I'm not enjoying that he didnt get the ending he wanted. He wasn't the only one in here for the sole purpose of rubbing in a bad game and now they got a little back.

IU is most definitely better than Purdue. Also, Pitt lost to an FCS team this year, Indiana has not, so.... no.

Crimson streak

Posts: 9,002

Nov 3, 2012 8:19pm

LJ;1311596 wrote:IU is most definitely better than Purdue. Also, Pitt lost to an FCS team this year, Indiana has not, so.... no.

To be fair Pitt I think had like 5-7 starters suspended for that game and there a completely different team since week one but still Pitt isn't very good

The Equalizer

Posts: 1,003

Nov 3, 2012 8:19pm

Okay I'll compromise and say I should have picked Purdue instead.

LJ

Posts: 16,351

Nov 3, 2012 8:21pm

Crimson streak;1311602 wrote:To be fair Pitt I think had like 5-7 starters suspended for that game and there a completely different team since week one but still Pitt isn't very good

Completely different? Nah. Sunseri is still a bonehead.

Crimson streak

Posts: 9,002

Nov 3, 2012 8:24pm

LJ;1311608 wrote:Completely different? Nah. Sunseri is still a bonehead.

Sunseri actually hasn't played bad at all this year 15 td's to 2 ints. But Pitt is still bad ugly ugly win

LJ

Posts: 16,351

Nov 3, 2012 8:26pm

Crimson streak;1311617 wrote:Sunseri actually hasn't played bad at all this year 15 td's to 2 ints. But Pitt is still bad ugly ugly win

His INT's haven't been bad, but he just makes boneheaded decisions. I think it was the Cincy game he lofted the ball through the endzone and time ran out. Just shit like that. He is careful with the ball, but my god, he makes some stupid decisions.

killer_ewok

Posts: 11,379

Nov 3, 2012 8:32pm

Was it an impressive win? No. But they found a way to win. I will take it.

wildcats20

Posts: 27,794

Nov 3, 2012 8:33pm

killer_ewok;1311633 wrote:Was it an impressive win? No. But they found a way to win. I will take it.

A win is a win is a win.