G
gut
Posts: 15,058
Oct 21, 2012 11:48pm
I'm not saying that at all. I'm only recognizing that, historically, wars have been fought over resources. You mistakingly assumed I was talking about the US when I said wars would result from such a situation.I Wear Pants;1301010 wrote:So you disagree that commodities are the property of the nations and people who they belong to?
G
gut
Posts: 15,058
Oct 21, 2012 11:50pm
I consider that an irresponsible perspective. A potential global war over resources, whether we are directly involved or not, is a concern we cannot simply ignore.O-Trap;1301197 wrote:No idea what they'll do. Not our responsibility (or right) to make sure they'll be okay, though.
O-Trap
Posts: 14,994
Oct 22, 2012 12:03am
If and when it happens, I agree. However, that war is no less likely to involve us directly if we do the bully thing ... in fact, I'd wager it's only more likely if that's the case.gut;1301398 wrote:I consider that an irresponsible perspective. A potential global war over resources, whether we are directly involved or not, is a concern we cannot simply ignore.
W
WebFire
Posts: 14,779
Oct 22, 2012 8:44am
Let's get back to what's important. What kind of bourbon?
O-Trap
Posts: 14,994
Oct 22, 2012 10:15am
LOLWebFire;1301496 wrote:Let's get back to what's important. What kind of bourbon?
Woodford Reserve
W
WebFire
Posts: 14,779
Oct 22, 2012 10:15am
Nice!O-Trap;1301555 wrote:LOL
Woodford Reserve
Devils Advocate
Posts: 4,539
Oct 22, 2012 11:53am
