I agree with this. Most hate Calipari, but he's never been proven to have broken the rules. He's slick, to be sure, but then again so are a lot of big time college coaches. However, there's still a chance that he really did have nothing to do with any of the illicit activity that went on at UMass and Memphis, so I reserve judgement.Azubuike24;1314365 wrote:More media hypocrisy.
UCLA recruit Shabazz Muhammad still under investigation, and rumors swiriling that he may never play a college game.
Indiana Freshman Hanner Perea and Peter Jurkin suspended 9 games each.
The only news blurb of the offseason you ever saw regarding eligibility? Kentucky Freshman Nerlens Noel being investigated. Articles in CBS, Sports Illustrated and Yahoo. Updates on the ESPN Ticker. Noel cleared, no wrongdoing found, no eligibility issues, yet the media accomplished it's goal. Attract readers and create a story out of nothing.
Sad.
With that said, taking both Kentucky and Calipari's histories into consideration, there you go, that's why ESPN and the rest of the basketball media only cares about controversy in Lexington. It's just like whenever Duke gets humiliated in the tournament or in any other game or the whole Lance Thomas affair, ESPN and everyone else rides that wave because that's what everyone wants to talk about.