10/13: #8 Ohio State def. Indiana, 52-49

College Sports 391 replies 6,892 views
V
vball10set
Posts: 24,795
Oct 14, 2012 10:13am
FatHobbit;1294786 wrote:Wow, the defense just isn't very good. They give up way too many big plays. The offense can run the ball ok and every now and then they hit a home run with a pass. The special teams are average and punt protection is atrocious. We are not a top ten team. The only reason we're undefeated is because we've played crap teams...
reps
Rotinaj;1294806 wrote:OSU is actually lucky they have the Bowl ban. Would lose by at least 2 TDs against whoever they played in the Rose Bowl.
smh
W
WebFire
Posts: 14,779
Oct 14, 2012 10:17am
ccrunner609;1294839 wrote:yeah its sad to see a team that knows they are going to win so the D just plays a shitty game.
Haha. Ok dude.

ccrunner609;1294839 wrote: I want to see a big offense and a good defense
Well no shit. What fan/coach/player doesn't? But you want track meets. I want solid football, defense included.
Rotinaj's avatar
Rotinaj
Posts: 7,699
Oct 14, 2012 10:43am
vball10set;1294844 wrote:reps



smh
I shouldn't of "at least" but I really do think they'd lose by about 14. You really think they can hang against the better teams in the country with that D?
Rotinaj's avatar
Rotinaj
Posts: 7,699
Oct 14, 2012 10:45am
It also makes me lol that you rep that post but shake your head at mine. Makes little sense.
Automatik's avatar
Automatik
Posts: 14,632
Oct 14, 2012 10:46am
USC or Oregon would wax that ass.


The term "SMH" needs to go.....like 6 months ago.
S
Sonofanump
Oct 14, 2012 1:42pm
Thread full of epic.
V
vball10set
Posts: 24,795
Oct 14, 2012 2:18pm
Rotinaj;1294862 wrote:It also makes me lol that you rep that post but shake your head at mine. Makes little sense.
Because he posted facts based on what he saw and what actually happened, while you talked in hyperbole and conjecture...makes perfect sense to me ;)
V
vball10set
Posts: 24,795
Oct 14, 2012 2:22pm
Automatik;1294864 wrote:USC or Oregon would wax that ass.


The term "SMH" needs to go.....like 6 months ago.
Kind of like Oregon would "wax that ass" (?) in 2010 Rose Bowl, or that Miami would in 2002 Fiesta Bowl? smFh
Fly4Fun's avatar
Fly4Fun
Posts: 7,730
Oct 14, 2012 2:34pm
vball10set;1295114 wrote:Kind of like Oregon would "wax that ass" (?) in 2010 Rose Bowl, or that Miami would in 2002 Fiesta Bowl? smFh
To be fair, those OSU teams had a defense.
Automatik's avatar
Automatik
Posts: 14,632
Oct 14, 2012 2:36pm
vball10set;1295114 wrote:Kind of like Oregon would "wax that ass" (?) in 2010 Rose Bowl, or that Miami would in 2002 Fiesta Bowl? smFh


In no way do either of those squads compare to the current defense. It's actually borderline insulting to even mention the '02 defense in the same discussion.
V
vball10set
Posts: 24,795
Oct 14, 2012 2:37pm
Fly4Fun;1295118 wrote:To be fair, those OSU teams had a defense.
True, but I can't stand it when someone says this team "would do this" or "would do that" to a team, when as anyone who watches college football with any regularity knows that, on any given day....
V
vball10set
Posts: 24,795
Oct 14, 2012 2:38pm
Automatik;1295120 wrote:In no way do either of those squads compare to the current defense. It's actually borderline insulting to even mention the '02 defense in the same discussion.
see post #337 :rolleyes:
V
vball10set
Posts: 24,795
Oct 14, 2012 2:40pm
Automatik;1295120 wrote:In no way do either of those squads compare to the current defense. It's actually borderline insulting to even mention the '02 defense in the same discussion.
I wasn't comparing defenses, I was merely stating that those teams "didn't match up" and "didn't stand much of a chance" against Oregon and Miami, respectively, either.
GoChiefs's avatar
GoChiefs
Posts: 16,754
Oct 14, 2012 3:51pm
vball10set;1295114 wrote:Kind of like Oregon would "wax that ass" (?) in 2010 Rose Bowl, or that Miami would in 2002 Fiesta Bowl? smFh
The term "smFh" needs to go.....like 6 months ago.
V
vball10set
Posts: 24,795
Oct 14, 2012 4:16pm
GoChiefs;1295186 wrote:The term "smFh" needs to go.....like 6 months ago.
There has to be "someone" you can "antagonize" over on "the" high school forum, so "please", go.
Rotinaj's avatar
Rotinaj
Posts: 7,699
Oct 14, 2012 4:23pm
vball10set;1295121 wrote:True, but I can't stand it when someone says this team "would do this" or "would do that" to a team, when as anyone who watches college football with any regularity knows that, on any given day....
LOL. I was stating my opinion which was backed by FACTS that YOU agreed with. Would you also "SMH" at me saying Alabama would beat BG by 5 TDs? ANY GIVEN DAY!!!!!
V
vball10set
Posts: 24,795
Oct 14, 2012 4:39pm
Rotinaj;1295227 wrote:LOL. I was stating my opinion which was backed by FACTS that YOU agreed with. Would you also "SMH" at me saying Alabama would beat BG by 5 TDs? ANY GIVEN DAY!!!!!
What FACTS did YOU give that I agreed with??? Also, Alabama vs. BG is a little different than an (eligible) OSU opponent in the Rose Bowl, don't ya' think?
LJ's avatar
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Oct 14, 2012 4:54pm
vball10set;1295241 wrote:What FACTS did YOU give that I agreed with??? Also, Alabama vs. BG is a little different than an (eligible) OSU opponent in the Rose Bowl, don't ya' think?

Yeah, BG's defense is better
Rotinaj's avatar
Rotinaj
Posts: 7,699
Oct 14, 2012 5:18pm
vball10set;1295241 wrote:What FACTS did YOU give that I agreed with??? Also, Alabama vs. BG is a little different than an (eligible) OSU opponent in the Rose Bowl, don't ya' think?
The facts that were quoted in the same post that you quoted mine. I didnt realize this would be that difficult to understand. You REP a post saying OSU isnt that great this year and you "SMH" at my post saying OSU would lose by 14 in the Rose Bowl. What is so hard to understand about this????
V
vball10set
Posts: 24,795
Oct 14, 2012 5:49pm
Rotinaj;1295271 wrote:The facts that were quoted in the same post that you quoted mine. I didnt realize this would be that difficult to understand. You REP a post saying OSU isnt that great this year and you "SMH" at my post saying OSU would lose by 14 in the Rose Bowl. What is so hard to understand about this????
His post was fact-based, yours was idiotic. My rep, my call.
V
vball10set
Posts: 24,795
Oct 14, 2012 5:51pm
LJ;1295253 wrote:Yeah, BG's defense is better
hahahahahahahahahahaha :rolleyes:....cute, but based on last night's performance, it's tough to argue with you.
W
WebFire
Posts: 14,779
Oct 14, 2012 6:41pm
At this point in the season, I don't think predicting OSU would lose by 2 TDs in the Rose Bowl is idiotic.
Rotinaj's avatar
Rotinaj
Posts: 7,699
Oct 14, 2012 6:43pm
vball10set;1295300 wrote:His post was fact-based, yours was idiotic. My rep, my call.
lol you arent very smart are you?
Rotinaj's avatar
Rotinaj
Posts: 7,699
Oct 14, 2012 6:44pm
WebFire;1295329 wrote:At this point in the season, I don't think predicting OSU would lose by 2 TDs in the Rose Bowl is idiotic.
He repped a post saying osu isnt very good yet my post saying theyd lose by 2 TDs is idiotic.
W
WebFire
Posts: 14,779
Oct 14, 2012 6:54pm
Rotinaj;1295334 wrote:He repped a post saying osu isnt very good yet my post saying theyd lose by 2 TDs is idiotic.
I know, that's what I was referring to.