killer_ewok
Posts: 11,379
Sep 13, 2012 1:54pm
I guess we'll just have to agree to disagree. As much as I hate the Browns...even I could not stand Capone and his relentless and obvious trolling. Stuff like that gets old....regardless of whether it is the truth or not and whether people accept it or not. At some point....it's time to give it a rest. And some people on here just don't get that.like_that;1269876 wrote:
I know you guys don't like sleeper, but there is no one comparable to capone and his blatant trolling. Sorry.
sleeper
Posts: 27,879
Sep 13, 2012 1:54pm
8-8 and 9-7 is terrible.O-Trap;1269902 wrote:I hear this CONSTANTLY. Even this year, multiple fans have told me that they believe they could go 8-8 pr 9-7 and could vie for the AFC North in two or three years.
killer_ewok
Posts: 11,379
Sep 13, 2012 1:55pm
False.sleeper;1269903 wrote:Umm, all of you. Check the first few pages of your ND 2012 fan which I was banned from for saying that ND would go 6-6 with a bowl loss(aka reality).
ernest_t_bass
Posts: 24,984
Sep 13, 2012 1:55pm
Agreed. Saying that the Clowns will go 8-8 or 9-7 is not the same as saying ND will go to a BCS Bowl.sleeper;1269905 wrote:8-8 and 9-7 is terrible.
I expect the Dolphins to suck every year, and cry about how great it was with Marino.
V
vball10set
Posts: 24,795
Sep 13, 2012 1:56pm
I just had a Fiber One bar--very tasty 
O-Trap
Posts: 14,994
Sep 13, 2012 1:58pm
Depending on where you play, you can win the division with that.sleeper;1269905 wrote:8-8 and 9-7 is terrible.
And it's irrelevant, as it's unrealistic to think they'll win that many, no matter what you think of that number.
O-Trap
Posts: 14,994
Sep 13, 2012 2:00pm
He said that people were saying that THIS year's team wasn't bad and that NEXT year's team would go to a BCS bowl.ernest_t_bass;1269907 wrote:Agreed. Saying that the Clowns will go 8-8 or 9-7 is not the same as saying ND will go to a BCS Bowl.
How is that different from a fan thinking THIS year's team has a chance at a winning record and NEXT year's team goes to the playoffs?
ernest_t_bass
Posts: 24,984
Sep 13, 2012 2:01pm
The LOLPhins are just terrible. Turrible.O-Trap;1269912 wrote:He said that people were saying that THIS year's team wasn't bad and that NEXT year's team would go to a BCS bowl.
How is that different from a fan thinking THIS year's team has a chance at a winning record and NEXT year's team goes to the playoffs?
like_that
Posts: 26,625
Sep 13, 2012 2:01pm
This pic always brings the lulz.
sleeper
Posts: 27,879
Sep 13, 2012 2:03pm
LOL. Well if you guys didn't get your panties in a bunch I could provide links. For example, how the fuck is ND even ranked? They beat a Navy team that's junk and barely beat a Purdue team that's junk as well. I can't wait until Michigan State drops 40 on them; ND will start talking about next year right then.killer_ewok;1269906 wrote:False.
sleeper
Posts: 27,879
Sep 13, 2012 2:04pm
8-8 is good? LOL Please. Most Browns fans are predicting 4-5 wins at most; the real blind dumb nuts are the only ones who think we can go 8-8.O-Trap;1269911 wrote:Depending on where you play, you can win the division with that.
And it's irrelevant, as it's unrealistic to think they'll win that many, no matter what you think of that number.
ernest_t_bass
Posts: 24,984
Sep 13, 2012 2:05pm
Whoah! He's a time traveler!like_that;1269915 wrote:This pic always brings the lulz.
O-Trap
Posts: 14,994
Sep 13, 2012 2:08pm
Even 5 seems pretty iffy.sleeper;1269918 wrote:8-8 is good? LOL Please. Most Browns fans are predicting 4-5 wins at most; the real blind dumb nuts are the only ones who think we can go 8-8.
8-8 isn't good, but it's not bad. It's middle of the pack. It's "not bad."
Come to Akron. There are apparently a lot of "blind, dumb nuts" here. They're unrealistic, but harmless.
killer_ewok
Posts: 11,379
Sep 13, 2012 2:12pm
No way. I know I didn't predict 10-2. They're coming off an 8-5 campaign and the schedule appears to be a grinder this season so 8-4 is my prediction. I would have raised an eyebrow at 10-2. Almost everything would have to work out and go right for that to happen and the odds of that are slim to none. Should ND be ranked? I don't know. However, you could probably question a few other teams and where/if they are ranked. And who really cares that much if a team is ranked 20th? It's not like it's some lofty ranking.sleeper;1269917 wrote:LOL. Well if you guys didn't get your panties in a bunch I could provide links. For example, how the fuck is ND even ranked? They beat a Navy team that's junk and barely beat a Purdue team that's junk as well. I can't wait until Michigan State drops 40 on them; ND will start talking about next year right then.
Also, I picked Michigan State to win Saturday. By double digits. And after that game I'll start talking about the ND-Michigan matchup.
T
Tiernan
Posts: 13,021
Sep 13, 2012 2:19pm
Those pics of the Hamburglar are F'n classic. The way he's kinda hunched over with his arms reaching down he sorta looks like somebody just kicked him the balls really hard and he's grabbing his sac.
Crimson streak
Posts: 9,002
Sep 13, 2012 2:23pm
It's hard to even post on an ND thread anymore. You get people like sleeper, knight rider, and tieran come in an just troll. I like to hear what other non biased fans have to think about notre dames team. Posters like v-ball, fat hobbit actually add to the discussion and not troll. I like to post on Irish envy but most of them are delusional, but here we have a bunch of different fan bases.
Crimson streak
Posts: 9,002
Sep 13, 2012 2:25pm
Also I thought ND would go 8-4 this year with an outside shot at 10-2. So don't call me a ND nut hugger
Devils Advocate
Posts: 4,539
Sep 13, 2012 2:34pm
Obligatory ND pic
sleeper
Posts: 27,879
Sep 13, 2012 2:38pm
Cry more. We come in there and tell you how bad ND is and then we get thread banned. Sorry reality hurts and that people think your college football team sucks(a fact).Crimson streak;1269943 wrote:It's hard to even post on an ND thread anymore. You get people like sleeper, knight rider, and tieran come in an just troll. I like to hear what other non biased fans have to think about notre dames team. Posters like v-ball, fat hobbit actually add to the discussion and not troll. I like to post on Irish envy but most of them are delusional, but here we have a bunch of different fan bases.
Oh well, enjoy your bowl loss!
mcburg93
Posts: 3,167
Sep 13, 2012 2:42pm
FUCK nd, FUCK nd fans, FUCK michigan, FUCK michigan fans, FUCK the sec, and FUCK the sec fans.
ohh and GFY if you dont agree.
ohh and GFY if you dont agree.
Crimson streak
Posts: 9,002
Sep 13, 2012 2:47pm
sleeper;1269965 wrote:Cry more. We come in there and tell you how bad ND is and then we get thread banned. Sorry reality hurts and that people think your college football team sucks(a fact).
Oh well, enjoy your bowl loss!
Thank you for making my point.
ernest_t_bass
Posts: 24,984
Sep 13, 2012 9:24pm
Holy shit. Check out the "Notre Dame to the ACC" thread. Lotz, you are so fucking thin skinned. Can't no one speak ill, or give a dissenting opinion of ND.
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Sep 13, 2012 9:29pm
ernest_t_bass;1270316 wrote:Holy shit. Check out the "Notre Dame to the ACC" thread. Lotz, you are so fucking thin skinned. Can't no one speak ill, or give a dissenting opinion of ND.
Sure they can. Saying generic group think comments like "the acc bent over for ND" is moronic. That's the best argument there is? Tell me how much you know about sports from watching ND Purdue last weekend.
ernest_t_bass
Posts: 24,984
Sep 13, 2012 9:35pm
That's just it. I make that comment, and you give your butthurt response.
Lol, you know a lot about sports, ETB. Lol.
It's my goddamn opinion. That thread is chock full of you QQing.
Lol, you know a lot about sports, ETB. Lol.
It's my goddamn opinion. That thread is chock full of you QQing.
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Sep 13, 2012 9:41pm
Ok then go back to the other thread and explain why Sparty will beat them by 20. Surely you saw something in the Purdue game that makes you think that. I'm honestly interested in why you think that. Or you can be a poster in line with cc, sleeper, dlazz, durkie, etc.