SportsAndLady;1266041 wrote:Not surprised ts didn't understand that...he just likes to regulate, makes him feel like a man or something, idk.

ts1227;1266029 wrote:You're going to be a very frustrated person if you call a post saying "it's one game" running amok, because no one in their right mind around here is going to moderate it.


I think they both lose, you need a QB markedly better than either of them to overcome Shurmur's system.

ts1227;1266049 wrote:I read the post and don't make my decisions based off of an opinion I developed about the OP 2 years ago. CoA and like_that report shit like that, which is why nothing ever happens on stuff they report.

SportsAndLady;1266039 wrote:My "Boy Toy"?

McCoy sucks..I know this. I'm not afraid to admit this. I've known that for a while now. Your obsession with Weeden is getting to the point that you can't call a spade a spade...that's why I feel sorry for you.

ts1227;1266049 wrote:I read the post and don't make my decisions based off of an opinion I developed about the OP 2 years ago. CoA and like_that report shit like that, which is why nothing ever happens on stuff they report.

BR1986FB;1266055 wrote:No obsession with Weeden. You obviously have reading comprehension issues since I said early they played well enough to win but the rookie QB cost them. I didn't mention where Little fucked them over too in that they may have had their only TD drive if he catches that ball.

I've known ALL along that Weeden would struggle and I've said it previously. Just because he sucked in his first game you don't give up on him. If he's playing like this in week 4 or 5 with no signs of improvement, yeah, bench him.

Crimson streak;1266033 wrote:I'm not disagreeing with that also. I just think If McCoy was playing today they would have won but going forward you still gotta give weedon another shot. You don't give up on a first rd pick after 1 game

SportsAndLady;1266069 wrote:You really need to see him play 4 or 5 games to realize he sucks? Did you not listen to myself, lhslep, and others tell you that he was terrible at Ok State when rushed in the pocket? That he completed 45% of his passes when he couldn't just dump it off on a bubble screen?

BR1986FB;1266079 wrote:All the McCoy nuthuggers got to watch that shitbag start 21 games so, yeah...I'd like to see a larger sample size of Weeden before declaring him trash.

said_aouita;1266083 wrote:Maybe I'm wrong but I thought they were saying this years O line is a lot better than last seasons?

BR1986FB;1266079 wrote:All the McCoy nuthuggers got to watch that shitbag start 21 games so, yeah...I'd like to see a larger sample size of Weeden before declaring him trash. He may very well suck but why would I give a fuck about your "QB expertise?" Seriously? Last time I checked, you weren't a scout and were just an Average Everyday Joe like the rest of us.

SportsAndLady;1266087 wrote: Oh and there is literally no such thing as "McCoy nuthuggers" You're just making that up to cover up how bad your favorite shit QB is.

BR1986FB;1266091 wrote:LOL, yeah right. There weren't ANY fans who thought McCoy should be the starter this year? Any? :rolleyes:

SportsAndLady;1266099 wrote:I mean I don't brainwash myself with Cleveland radio (mostly because I have no source to listen to it...but also because those fans are hick retards that i don't want to hear the opinions of), but no one one here wanted McCoy. None of my friends wanted McCoy. Nobody on my facebook wanted McCoy. Even I was all for Weeden starting...because I know McCoy wasn't good; and while I was pretty sure Weeden would suck, I wasn't 100%. Yes, Im 100% sure now. Puke. Next.

BR1986FB;1266102 wrote:Maybe nobody on YOUR Facebook wanted him. Start "liking" some links of Browns sites on there and you'll see how ridiculous it is. I'm not even referring to Cleveland sports talk. I haven't listened to that in months.

BR1986FB;1266091 wrote:LOL, yeah right. There weren't ANY fans who thought McCoy should be the starter this year? Any? :rolleyes:

lhslep134;1266111 wrote: Take the 1st round label off of Weeden and you have this:

28 year old rookie who was handed a gem of a defensive performance and botched it with a 44 passer rating of a game, with poor throws for 2 easy touchdowns. Not someone I want leading my offense, sorry.

lhslep134;1266111 wrote:I believe I have narrowed your logic down to this.

Saying Weeden sucks=Thinking Colt McCoy should start=being a McCoy nuthugger

What the f*ck is wrong with you? Seriously? If you want to vehemently defend Weeden's place as starting QB fine. But stop f*cking saying everyone who thinks McCoy would have played better or that McCoy should be playing is AUTOMATICALLY A "MCCOY NUTHUGGER" OR MCCOY IS SOMEONE'S "BOY TOY"

It's seriously to the point that I have to go out of my to call you out on it. It's getting ridiculous. Weeden f*cking blew d*ck under pressure which is exactly the concern of not only some on here, but the scouts who wrote the analysis that we cited, and why we shouldn't play him.

Take the 1st round label off of Weeden and you have this:

28 year old rookie who was handed a gem of a defensive performance and botched it with a 44 passer rating of a game, with poor throws for 2 easy touchdowns. Not someone I want leading my offense, sorry.

BR1986FB;1266114 wrote:Don't disagree with this. Never said this wasn't the case. He sucked. I never defended his performance today but I WILL defend a QB, regardless of how BAD his play was, from idiots who think he should be benched after his FIRST NFL start.

SportsAndLady;1266117 wrote:It's not necessarily that we think he should be benched, more-so that we want a better QB to be on this team. One that isn't currently on our roster.

BR1986FB;1266120 wrote:Well, too bad...guess you're gonna have to "suffer" for another year. :laugh: Richardson looked pretty shitty today. Hope they get rid of him too.

SportsAndLady;1266129 wrote:I'm just really glad you're happy with Weeden as our starting QB. That makes you look incredibly smart & intelligent lolololol