Poll: Brandon' Weeden's QB rating after his first game...

Pro Sports 50 replies 1,737 views
shook_17's avatar
shook_17
Posts: 3,023
Sep 9, 2012 9:50pm
se-alum;1265958 wrote:Weeden showed no ability in the pre-season, not sure why you would be surprised or disappointed.
because this is just down right horrid. i expected more from our offense. our oline got no push, weeden couldn't hit the board side of a barn and greg little still cant catch a fucking ball. so yes disappointed.
LJ's avatar
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Sep 9, 2012 10:41pm
Laley23's avatar
Laley23
Posts: 29,506
Sep 9, 2012 11:48pm
Dont know what I expected, but certainly better than that. Holy fuck he was awful.
Classyposter58's avatar
Classyposter58
Posts: 6,321
Sep 10, 2012 1:20am
Me and my buddy were watching all the games at B Dubs and I agree, this guy is actually pretty f*cking terrible. Like you can't not cuss, he's awful. McCoy should start immediately
dazedconfused's avatar
dazedconfused
Posts: 2,662
Sep 10, 2012 1:35am
Classyposter58;1266620 wrote:Me and my buddy were watching all the games at B Dubs and I agree, this guy is actually pretty f*cking terrible. Like you can't not cuss, he's awful. McCoy should start immediately
what would that accomplish?
Classyposter58's avatar
Classyposter58
Posts: 6,321
Sep 10, 2012 1:49am
dazedconfused;1266623 wrote:what would that accomplish?
I mean he had a 58% completion and 14 TD-11 INT which is better than Weeden may ever do
ricola's avatar
ricola
Posts: 855
Sep 10, 2012 1:57am
so basically we're talking Ryan Leaf type incompetence here. Geesh..only in Cleveland.
HitsRus's avatar
HitsRus
Posts: 9,206
Sep 10, 2012 8:18am
^^^yep....Lowest QB rating for a complete game. Ryan Leaf threw a perfect 0.0....and followed that up the next week with 6.5. If you think about it....51 would have been pretty bad, but probably would have been good enough to win that game.
wes_mantooth's avatar
wes_mantooth
Posts: 17,977
Sep 10, 2012 8:42am
Yeah, worst I have ever seen. He didn't get any help from Little or the full back...but that was an awful effort.
said_aouita's avatar
said_aouita
Posts: 8,532
Sep 10, 2012 9:02am
A related side note for the Browns and their QB woes, rgiii who could have been the Browns QB set a record yesterday with over 300 yards, 2 TD's and 0 interceptions.
No rookie has ever done that before.

Thought that was an interesting fact.
wes_mantooth's avatar
wes_mantooth
Posts: 17,977
Sep 10, 2012 9:21am
lol...we get it...you like RG3. Go away.
GOONx19's avatar
GOONx19
Posts: 7,147
Sep 10, 2012 9:56am
The Browns could not have had RGIII. End of story.
like_that's avatar
like_that
Posts: 26,625
Sep 10, 2012 9:57am
GOONx19;1266739 wrote:The Browns could not have had RGIII. End of story.
He knows nothing about sports other than running on grass. Don't mind him.
SportsAndLady's avatar
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Sep 10, 2012 10:13am
like_that;1266740 wrote:He knows nothing about sports other than running on grass. Don't mind him.
lol +1
SportsAndLady's avatar
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Sep 10, 2012 10:18am
If this isn't proof enough that aouita is a rg3 troll (i seriously cannot believe someone is a big enough loser to use rg3 as a troll device against Cleveland..), i don't know what is.

This was just yesterday too. He's been doing this since the draft.


said_aouita;1265996 wrote:rg3 had a perfect qb rating at half time too.


Thank god the Browns didn't get him.





said_aouita;1265973 wrote:It's a good thing the Browns didn't go "all-in" on rgiii. He was horrible today.


(oops, wrong thread)




said_aouita;1265973 wrote:He's looked OK against the Saints. :)


said_aouita;1265567 wrote:RG3 - 11/13 for 182 yards with 2 td's


said_aouita;1265419 wrote:while commercial break for the Browns- Believe I just heard rgiii is 7for7 so far and just threw for a td.



IggyPride00's avatar
IggyPride00
Posts: 6,482
Sep 10, 2012 10:21am
said_aouita;1266688 wrote:A related side note for the Browns and their QB woes, rgiii who could have been the Browns QB set a record yesterday with over 300 yards, 2 TD's and 0 interceptions.
No rookie has ever done that before.

Thought that was an interesting fact.
Joe Montana in his prime doesn't throw for 300 yards, 2 TD's and 0 int's in Pat Shurmur's offense.

RGIII would have been ruined just like any other QB who touches the ball with that guy responsible for calling plays.
SportsAndLady's avatar
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Sep 10, 2012 10:23am
IggyPride00;1266764 wrote:Joe Montana in his prime doesn't throw for 300 yards, 2 TD's and 0 int's in Pat Shurmur's offense.

RGIII would have been ruined just like any other QB who touches the ball with that guy responsible for calling plays.
Dude just stop. RG3 wouldn't have put up 300 yards 2TDs, but he would have done a lot better than a fucking 5 Qb Rating; which would have meant we win that game yesterday.
sleeper's avatar
sleeper
Posts: 27,879
Sep 10, 2012 10:25am
Obviously it would have been nice to get RG3, but the asking price was ridiculous. The Redskins won't have any depth since they've mortgaged a huge chunk of their future on a great QB. A great QB can only get you so far and if anyone watched the game yesterday, it's painfully obvious they are thin as hell on offense and have zero depth on defense.
like_that's avatar
like_that
Posts: 26,625
Sep 10, 2012 10:29am
SportsAndLady;1266762 wrote:If this isn't proof enough that aouita is a rg3 troll (i seriously cannot believe someone is a big enough loser to use rg3 as a troll device against Cleveland..), i don't know what is.

This was just yesterday too. He's been doing this since the draft.
It's probably one of the worst troll acts I have seen in awhile.
Classyposter58's avatar
Classyposter58
Posts: 6,321
Sep 10, 2012 10:41am
sleeper;1266768 wrote:Obviously it would have been nice to get RG3, but the asking price was ridiculous. The Redskins won't have any depth since they've mortgaged a huge chunk of their future on a great QB. A great QB can only get you so far and if anyone watched the game yesterday, it's painfully obvious they are thin as hell on offense and have zero depth on defense.
They just beat the Saints in the Superdome and put up 40 points? Thin as hell?
SportsAndLady's avatar
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Sep 10, 2012 10:59am
Classyposter58;1266776 wrote:They just beat the Saints in the Superdome and put up 40 points? Thin as hell?
rg3 won his first game @ NO; Super bowl here they come!!!!!
said_aouita's avatar
said_aouita
Posts: 8,532
Sep 10, 2012 11:33am
sleeper;1266768 wrote:Obviously it would have been nice to get RG3, but the asking price was ridiculous. The Redskins won't have any depth since they've mortgaged a huge chunk of their future on a great QB.
That's true. Time will tell if the price was worth it. I didn't compare both teams rosters. Browns have a lot more needs and obviously were not willing to go "all-in" on him.
SportsAndLady;1266798 wrote:rg3 won his first game @ NO; Super bowl here they come!!!!!
I was surprised when I heard that the Saints did not lose one home game last year.
sleeper's avatar
sleeper
Posts: 27,879
Sep 10, 2012 1:31pm
Classyposter58;1266776 wrote:They just beat the Saints in the Superdome and put up 40 points? Thin as hell?
Yes they are absolutely thin. They have a good team, but you could tell the defense was worn out, which allowed the Saints to come roaring back and almost win it. Just wait until a few injuries hit the team and they will be picking in the top 10 soon enough(well 3 years from now when they get a pick).
sleeper's avatar
sleeper
Posts: 27,879
Sep 10, 2012 1:33pm
I watched the whole game with RG3 and they probably played the best game they will have all season. This is not a playoff team and 1 win over the Saints proves nothing.
like_that's avatar
like_that
Posts: 26,625
Sep 10, 2012 1:37pm
sleeper;1266940 wrote:I watched the whole game with RG3 and they probably played the best game they will have all season. This is not a playoff team and 1 win over the Saints proves nothing.
You did?