| AP Top 25 | |||
| RK | TEAM | RECORD | PTS |
| 1 | USC (25) | 0-0 | 1445 |
| 2 | Alabama (17) | 0-0 | 1411 |
| 3 | LSU (16) | 0-0 | 1402 |
| 4 | Oklahoma (1) | 0-0 | 1286 |
| 5 | Oregon | 0-0 | 1274 |
| 6 | Georgia | 0-0 | 1107 |
| 7 | Florida State | 0-0 | 1093 |
| 8 | Michigan (1) | 0-0 | 1000 |
| 9 | South Carolina | 0-0 | 994 |
| 10 | Arkansas | 0-0 | 963 |
| 11 | West Virginia | 0-0 | 856 |
| 12 | Wisconsin | 0-0 | 838 |
| 13 | Michigan State | 0-0 | 742 |
| 14 | Clemson | 0-0 | 615 |
| 15 | Texas | 0-0 | 569 |
| 16 | Virginia Tech | 0-0 | 548 |
| 17 | Nebraska | 0-0 | 485 |
| 18 | Ohio State | 0-0 | 474 |
| 19 | Oklahoma State | 0-0 | 430 |
| 20 | TCU | 0-0 | 397 |
| 21 | Stanford | 0-0 | 383 |
| 22 | Kansas State | 0-0 | 300 |
| 23 | Florida | 0-0 | 214 |
| 24 | Boise State | 0-0 | 212 |
| 25 | Louisville | 0-0 | 105 |
Typical ESPNNilesPacMan;1249707 wrote:I didn't see Ohio State at first, wondering why didn't receive any votes. Then, look at the poll, ESPN doesn't have the 18th ranked in the poll; it goes from 17th to 19th.
NilesPacMan;1249707 wrote:I didn't see Ohio State at first, wondering why didn't receive any votes. Then, look at the poll, ESPN doesn't have the 18th ranked in the poll; it goes from 17th to 19th.
Lol yea I'm with you.vball10set;1249748 wrote:
gotcha' :thumbup:NilesPacMan;1249789 wrote:Wow, I'm sorry. That post was full of grammatical errors.
When ESPN originally put up the poll, they failed to place Ohio State in there, going from seventeen to nineteen in the rankings.
Pick6;1249737 wrote:Typical ESPN
ts1227;1249918 wrote:I usually say you guys are full of shit with the ESPN hates OSU bullshit, but I don't recall them hiding USC in their publishing of the AP poll in the past 2 years. This is pretty shitty of them
| AP Top 25 | ||||
| 1 | Alabama (45) | 1-0 | 1481 | 2 |
| 2 | USC (11) | 1-0 | 1435 | 1 |
| 3 | LSU (4) | 1-0 | 1382 | 3 |
| 4 | Oregon | 1-0 | 1295 | 5 |
| 5 | Oklahoma | 1-0 | 1170 | 4 |
| 6 | Florida State | 1-0 | 1135 | 7 |
| 7 | Georgia | 1-0 | 1083 | 6 |
| 8 | Arkansas | 1-0 | 992 | 10 |
| 9 | South Carolina | 1-0 | 980 | 9 |
| 9 | West Virginia | 1-0 | 980 | 11 |
| 11 | Michigan State | 1-0 | 915 | 13 |
| 12 | Clemson | 1-0 | 788 | 14 |
| 13 | Wisconsin | 1-0 | 664 | 12 |
| 14 | Ohio State | 1-0 | 634 | 18 |
| 15 | Virginia Tech | 1-0 | 604 | 16 |
| 16 | Nebraska | 1-0 | 603 | 17 |
| 17 | Texas | 1-0 | 584 | 15 |
| 18 | Oklahoma State | 1-0 | 558 | 19 |
| 19 | Michigan | 0-1 | 446 | 8 |
| 20 | TCU | 0-0 | 355 | 20 |
| 21 | Kansas State | 1-0 | 339 | 22 |
| 22 | Notre Dame | 1-0 | 198 | NR |
| 23 | Louisville | 1-0 | 190 | 25 |
| 24 | Florida | 1-0 | 145 | 23 |
| 25 | Stanford | 1-0 | 131 | 21 |
No mention of Wisconsins awesome performance against Northern Iowa I see. LOL.sleeper;1261327 wrote:Florida barely scoots by BGSU and South Carolina shouldn't even be ranked after the garbage performance against Vanderbilt.
SEC overrated after week 1, again.
Wisc, MSU, and Mich looked like champs this past w/e. btw, B1G is 0-1 this year vs the SEC head to head. Oklahoma and ND are the ones you should complain about.sleeper;1261327 wrote:Florida barely scoots by BGSU and South Carolina shouldn't even be ranked after the garbage performance against Vanderbilt.
SEC overrated after week 1, again.
cats gone wild;1261414 wrote:Wisc, MSU, and Mich looked like champs this past w/e. btw, B1G is 0-1 this year vs the SEC head to head. Oklahoma and ND are the ones you should complain about.
For sleeper they would be, and he would usually complain about that. And he would complain about them jumping teams that were already ranked who didnt lose. It was just a shock to see him not bash ND. ND is not over ranked imo. If you are complaining about my post about ND, then how can you say UF is over rated?Crimson streak;1261415 wrote:ND is over rated at 22? Seriously? I could under stand if they were top 10 but 22? And yes Georgia, Florida, south Carolina are definitely over rated. But do is Wisconsin.
thisRotinaj;1261418 wrote:I really don't see how someone can say a team that is ranked 24th at this point in the season is overrated.
cats gone wild;1261421 wrote:For sleeper they would be, and he would usually complain about that. And he would complain about them jumping teams that were already ranked who didnt lose. It was just a shock to see him not bash ND. ND is not over ranked imo. If you are complaining about my post about ND, then how can you say UF is over rated?
Northern Iowa would win the SEC most years; well at least they would win the East, but so could my high school football team.Rotinaj;1261387 wrote:No mention of Wisconsins awesome performance against Northern Iowa I see. LOL.
Yea, you're probably right. My apologies.sleeper;1261429 wrote:Northern Iowa would win the SEC most years; well at least they would win the East, but so could my high school football team.