Cited with disorderly conduct

Serious Business 40 replies 553 views
F
fan_from_texas
Posts: 2,693
Jul 10, 2012 2:23pm
mcburg93;1222144 wrote:The biggest problem with pressing charges against the owner and/or cop is Im guessing barry had been drinking. If that is the case he will be torn apart by the court. trying to go against two sober people is usually a rough thing.

This. A drunk guy arguing against a business owner and a cop with no witnesses and no surveillance has an uphill slog. Unfortunate, maybe, but true.

Does OH provide public defenders for a misdemeanor? I don't think they're required to, and many states do not. Only for felony charges.

You can check with a legal aid org at your school or city to talk options. Or you can hire a lawyer. Avvo and martindale are good spots to start the legal search.
hoops23's avatar
hoops23
Posts: 15,696
Jul 10, 2012 2:45pm
Apple;1222560 wrote:How the hell is the business owner a liberal? He is trying to make a PROFIT and he EMPLOYS people. In America today THAT is NOT what a liberal does.

to the OP... listen to Belly.
Shut up liberal trash.
MontetheCarlo's avatar
MontetheCarlo
Posts: 4
Jul 10, 2012 3:17pm
Again...check with your college. I know at BGSU they have a lawyer that helps defend students when they're accused of underage drinking, traffice, disorderly, etc. Free of charge. And that dude is one busy mofo.
Speedofsand's avatar
Speedofsand
Posts: 5,529
Jul 10, 2012 3:53pm
You are suspended for the first game.
Y
yobro08
Posts: 237
Jul 10, 2012 9:54pm
no big deal, mine was 100 bucks and i was on my way
S
sjmvsfscs08
Posts: 2,963
Jul 10, 2012 10:01pm
Fight it fight it fight it.

They have to get EVERY juror to believe you did whatever you are accused of doing. If you truly didn't do it, then you don't have much to worry about it.

Fuck the police.
Glory Days's avatar
Glory Days
Posts: 7,809
Jul 10, 2012 11:30pm
sjmvsfscs08;1222938 wrote:Fight it fight it fight it.

They have to get EVERY juror to believe you did whatever you are accused of doing. If you truly didn't do it, then you don't have much to worry about it.

Fuck the police.
this wouldnt be a jury trial.
I
I Wear Pants
Posts: 16,223
Jul 10, 2012 11:36pm
Glory Days;1223081 wrote:this wouldnt be a jury trial.
^^^^ Dude's right here.
S
Steel Valley Football
Posts: 4,548
Jul 11, 2012 12:18am
Lol at the jury comment.
TedSheckler's avatar
TedSheckler
Posts: 3,974
Jul 11, 2012 5:50am
You just have to hope the jury gets sequestered. Once the story gets out to the media, they could become tainted.

I'm looking forward to watching the trial on Court TV.
Glory Days's avatar
Glory Days
Posts: 7,809
Jul 11, 2012 11:22am
I
I Wear Pants
Posts: 16,223
Jul 11, 2012 11:48am
Glory Days;1223349 wrote:
God I hate that bitch.
OSH's avatar
OSH
Posts: 4,145
Jul 11, 2012 12:21pm
Judge Judy or Judge Joe Brown would love to hear this case...
Glory Days's avatar
Glory Days
Posts: 7,809
Jul 11, 2012 12:58pm
I Wear Pants;1223380 wrote:God I hate that bitch.
..........tot......mom.....


S
superman
Posts: 3,582
Jul 11, 2012 2:31pm
Glory Days;1223081 wrote:this wouldnt be a jury trial.
He could request one.
Glory Days's avatar
Glory Days
Posts: 7,809
Jul 11, 2012 2:39pm
superman;1223547 wrote:He could request one.
No he cant. A simple disorderly is a minor misdemeanor.
[h=1]2917.11 Disorderly conduct.[/h](A) No person shall recklessly cause inconvenience, annoyance, or alarm to another by doing any of the following:
(1) Engaging in fighting, in threatening harm to persons or property, or in violent or turbulent behavior;
(2) Making unreasonable noise or an offensively coarse utterance, gesture, or display or communicating unwarranted and grossly abusive language to any person;
(3) Insulting, taunting, or challenging another, under circumstances in which that conduct is likely to provoke a violent response;
(4) Hindering or preventing the movement of persons on a public street, road, highway, or right-of-way, or to, from, within, or upon public or private property, so as to interfere with the rights of others, and by any act that serves no lawful and reasonable purpose of the offender;
(5) Creating a condition that is physically offensive to persons or that presents a risk of physical harm to persons or property, by any act that serves no lawful and reasonable purpose of the offender.
(B) No person, while voluntarily intoxicated, shall do either of the following:
(1) In a public place or in the presence of two or more persons, engage in conduct likely to be offensive or to cause inconvenience, annoyance, or alarm to persons of ordinary sensibilities, which conduct the offender, if the offender were not intoxicated, should know is likely to have that effect on others;
(2) Engage in conduct or create a condition that presents a risk of physical harm to the offender or another, or to the property of another.
(C) Violation of any statute or ordinance of which an element is operating a motor vehicle, locomotive, watercraft, aircraft, or other vehicle while under the influence of alcohol or any drug of abuse, is not a violation of division (B) of this section.
(D) If a person appears to an ordinary observer to be intoxicated, it is probable cause to believe that person is voluntarily intoxicated for purposes of division (B) of this section.
(E)(1) Whoever violates this section is guilty of disorderly conduct.
(2) Except as otherwise provided in division (E)(3) of this section, disorderly conduct is a minor misdemeanor.
2945.17 Right to jury trial.

(A) At any trial, in any court, for the violation of any statute of this state, or of any ordinance of any municipal corporation, except as provided in divisions (B) and (C) of this section, the accused has the right to be tried by a jury.
(B) The right to be tried by a jury that is granted under division (A) of this section does not apply to a violation of a statute or ordinance that is any of the following:
(1) A violation that is a minor misdemeanor;

(2) A violation for which the potential penalty does not include the possibility of a prison term or jail term and for which the possible fine does not exceed one thousand dollars.
(C) Division (A) of this section does not apply to, and there is no right to a jury trial for, a person who is the subject of a complaint filed under section 2151.27 of the Revised Code against both a child and the parent, guardian, or other person having care of the child.