S
Sonofanump
Jun 7, 2012 1:29pm
I agree with your decision, see you did not need college.SnotBubbles;1192016 wrote:I'm not DQing anyone. They weren't mods when the competition started.
Raw Dawgin' it
Posts: 11,466
Jun 7, 2012 1:31pm
I doubt I'll be coming back from this - so i'll be supporting Curly J from here on out in the East!
SnotBubbles
Posts: 4,492
Jun 7, 2012 1:31pm
THE4RINGZ;1192021 wrote:Your contest, your rules.
Crown him! Crown him!
SnotBubbles
Posts: 4,492
Jun 7, 2012 1:31pm
I went to collage for sum years. So stop with that sillinesss.Sonofanump;1192023 wrote:I agree with your decision, see you did not need college.
THE4RINGZ
Posts: 16,816
Jun 7, 2012 1:32pm
SnotBubbles;1192030 wrote:
I was thinking more Dennis Greene.
DeadliestWarrior34
Posts: 3,101
Jun 7, 2012 2:41pm
You couldnt win if you faced yourself.SnotBubbles;1192019 wrote:I'll take your spot too. I now have 5 entries (my original, laley's, gorocks, yours and the write-in vote).
I know how to win...
SnotBubbles
Posts: 4,492
Jun 7, 2012 2:52pm
Also couldn't lose.DeadliestWarrior34;1192122 wrote:You couldnt win if you faced yourself.
Sorry that I just BLEW YOUR FUCKING MIND!
1_beast
Posts: 5,642
Jun 7, 2012 3:45pm
I can give you at least 5 names that have under 10 posts that have been members for years....however they just read, so they aren't entitled to a vote? lolRotinaj;1191538 wrote:If someone doesnt have at least 50 posts their vote shouldnt count. Its as simple as that.
see abovelike_that;1191541 wrote:I would say 100.
Soooooo is this an OC contest (which includes football/wrestling) or is this just a serious business contest?chicago510;1191571 wrote:Lets be honest, it doesn't matter who we vote for because the football/wrestling mafia is going to send in their thugs to fix the vote.
like_that;1192010 wrote:How about 1_beast takes gorocks place?
Nah, I'll pass....Im done. Too much crying.
like_that
Posts: 26,625
Jun 7, 2012 3:56pm
You are trying to hard to pretend you don't care lol. Also, pot meet kettle on crying thats for sure. I have hardly posted on the west bracket thread since it was announced i am advancing.1_beast;1192171 wrote:I can give you at least 5 names that have under 10 posts that have been members for years....however they just read, so they aren't entitled to a vote? lol
see above
Soooooo is this an OC contest (which includes football/wrestling) or is this just a serious business contest?
Nah, I'll pass....Im done. Too much crying.
To answer your question, imo they shouldn't be entitled to vote if they don't particpate. In fact there is a thread created to find ways to increase activity on this site... How do you know they read anyway? Do you check their profiles daily to see if they logged on?
1_beast
Posts: 5,642
Jun 7, 2012 4:00pm
I know they read because they are friends/coaches that laugh about the stuff on here and comment personally but never comment on the threads. Pretty simple concept.like_that;1192184 wrote:You are trying to hard to pretend you don't care lol. Also, pot meet kettle on crying thats for sure. I have hardly posted on the west bracket thread since it was announced i am advancing.
To answer your question, imo they shouldn't be entitled to vote if they don't particpate. In fact there is a thread created to find ways to increase activity on this site... How do you know they read anyway? Do you check their profiles daily to see if they logged on?
SnotBubbles
Posts: 4,492
Jun 7, 2012 4:19pm
I disagree with this. Plenty of people read every day but rarely post, and many of those people have been around as long as you or I. They are just as familiar with each member as someone who posts regularly. The whole issue (for me) is whether or not we had more than 4 people vote with multiple usernames. I am 95% sure that there were at least 4....I know for sure 3.like_that;1192184 wrote:You are trying to hard to pretend you don't care lol. Also, pot meet kettle on crying thats for sure. I have hardly posted on the west bracket thread since it was announced i am advancing.
To answer your question, imo they shouldn't be entitled to vote if they don't particpate. In fact there is a thread created to find ways to increase activity on this site... How do you know they read anyway? Do you check their profiles daily to see if they logged on?
FatHobbit
Posts: 8,651
Jun 7, 2012 4:28pm
Your contest, your rulesSnotBubbles;1192213 wrote:I disagree with this. Plenty of people read every day but rarely post, and many of those people have been around as long as you or I. They are just as familiar with each member as someone who posts regularly. The whole issue (for me) is whether or not we had more than 4 people vote with multiple usernames. I am 95% sure that there were at least 4....I know for sure 3.
FWIW I agree and think people who read but don't post should absolutely be allowed to vote and people who have created multiple user names should only have their vote counted once. (I read the other site for a looong time before they made it free and then I started to post.)
like_that
Posts: 26,625
Jun 7, 2012 4:33pm
SnotBubbles;1192213 wrote:I disagree with this. Plenty of people read every day but rarely post, and many of those people have been around as long as you or I. They are just as familiar with each member as someone who posts regularly. The whole issue (for me) is whether or not we had more than 4 people vote with multiple usernames. I am 95% sure that there were at least 4....I know for sure 3.
I think it's lame especially since wee are trying to increase activity here. I know for a fact a majority those posters most likely know nothing about 1/8 the field.
It's your ruling though and if that's the case apparently mamabear is his wife. So count her vote and he gets the win.
sleeper
Posts: 27,879
Jun 7, 2012 5:12pm
We really shouldn't get into active users who post vs. active users who read. If you are a member, you get a vote.
Now if you are a moderator and you aren't active, that's a freaking joke.
Now if you are a moderator and you aren't active, that's a freaking joke.
M
MontyBrunswick
Jun 7, 2012 5:24pm
Enough of this nonsense about votes. What I want to know is why Curly J is so loved on these forums.
sleeper
Posts: 27,879
Jun 7, 2012 5:33pm
I don't get it either.dlazz;1192258 wrote:Enough of this nonsense about votes. What I want to know is why Curly J is so loved on these forums.
M
MontyBrunswick
Jun 7, 2012 5:37pm
I'll bet he's sleeping around.
S
Sonofanump
Jun 7, 2012 5:50pm
He will reaheat it up on a skillet, but will eat it cold.dlazz;1192258 wrote:Enough of this nonsense about votes. What I want to know is why Curly J is so loved on these forums.
ernest_t_bass
Posts: 24,984
Jun 7, 2012 7:00pm
Because he never acts like a douche?dlazz;1192258 wrote:Enough of this nonsense about votes. What I want to know is why Curly J is so loved on these forums.
chicago510
Posts: 5,728
Jun 7, 2012 7:03pm
OC suffrage is serious business.sleeper;1192249 wrote:We really shouldn't get into active users who post vs. active users who read. If you are a member, you get a vote.
Now if you are a moderator and you aren't active, that's a freaking joke.
M
MontyBrunswick
Jun 7, 2012 8:02pm
All the more reason he doesn't deserve votes. Majority of us act like douches.ernest_t_bass;1192323 wrote:Because he never acts like a douche?
DeadliestWarrior34
Posts: 3,101
Jun 7, 2012 8:57pm
He gets my vote because we're life partners.dlazz;1192258 wrote:Enough of this nonsense about votes. What I want to know is why Curly J is so loved on these forums.
Rotinaj
Posts: 7,699
Jun 7, 2012 9:23pm
You too huh?DeadliestWarrior34;1192474 wrote:He gets my vote because we're life partners.
Raw Dawgin' it
Posts: 11,466
Jun 8, 2012 10:33am
Cause he's the GOATdlazz;1192258 wrote:Enough of this nonsense about votes. What I want to know is why Curly J is so loved on these forums.
Commander of Awesome
Posts: 23,151
Jun 8, 2012 11:08am
Tough choice between Laley and RDI. RDI repped me most recently (not sure if Laley has ever repped me) thus he got my vote. Tough match up to choose.