GoChiefs
Posts: 16,754
May 29, 2012 6:19pm
skank;1184088 wrote:Sure you didn't just sit on the hood?
skank;1184089 wrote:Sure you didn't just sit on the deer?
What's next? A priest joke? Kinda funny though. A little birdie tells me you sure as hell aren't the skinniest around, yet, you get online and try to make fat jokes. Lol.
skank
Posts: 6,543
May 29, 2012 6:23pm
GoChiefs;1184137 wrote:What's next? A priest joke? Kinda funny though. A little birdie tells me you sure as hell aren't the skinniest around, yet, you get online and try to make fat jokes. Lol.
Nope, not the skinniest, but....Not obese either.
hoops23
Posts: 15,696
May 29, 2012 6:23pm
Mustangs...slow? LMAO.GoChiefs;1183557 wrote:Being a Mustang fan, you got some nerve calling anyones car slow.
Better educate yourself bro. There's a reason the Mustang has been winning the pony wars the last several years.
GoChiefs
Posts: 16,754
May 29, 2012 6:27pm
hoops23;1184143 wrote:Mustangs...slow? LMAO.
Better educate yourself bro. There's a reason the Mustang has been winning the pony wars the last several years.
Depends on how much money you're willing to throw under the hood, bro.
ZWICK 4 PREZ
Posts: 7,733
May 29, 2012 9:49pm
Stocker 5.0 is faster than a stocker SS or stocker srt-8.GoChiefs;1184148 wrote:Depends on how much money you're willing to throw under the hood, bro.
hoops23
Posts: 15,696
May 29, 2012 9:52pm
No. The rebirth of the 5.0 brought back the true muscle of the Stang. Not to mention the Shelby or Boss 302 models.GoChiefs;1184148 wrote:Depends on how much money you're willing to throw under the hood, bro.
The 2013 Stangs are ridiculously powerful.
Stock to stock, the Mustang outperforms the Camaro and the Challenger.
GoChiefs
Posts: 16,754
May 29, 2012 9:56pm
ZWICK 4 PREZ;1184274 wrote:Stocker 5.0 is faster than a stocker SS or stocker srt-8.
hoops23;1184275 wrote:No. The rebirth of the 5.0 brought back the true muscle of the Stang. Not to mention the Shelby or Boss 302 models.
The 2013 Stangs are ridiculously powerful.
Stock to stock, the Mustang outperforms the Camaro and the Challenger.
If you are worried about being faster, why the hell would you buy any just to leave it stock???
ZWICK 4 PREZ
Posts: 7,733
May 30, 2012 5:54am
This makes no sense. It's faster stock so it's easier/cheaper to make it/keep it faster than it's counterparts. Chevy's motors don't respond as well to power adders like a SC as Ford's OHC motors. They do respond better kept N/A but internal motor work is EXPENSIVE... Keep using 19th century pushrod technology GM :/. Dodge..well their motors have always been underperformers for the size. /engineeringfailGoChiefs;1184281 wrote:If you are worried about being faster, why the hell would you buy any just to leave it stock???
said_aouita
Posts: 8,532
May 30, 2012 6:53am
Did green lights and green pin stripping improve your quarter mile a lot?GoChiefs;1184281 wrote:If you are worried about being faster, why the hell would you buy any just to leave it stock???
Just kidding. Obviously good performance and a quality product was not your focus when you purchased that car.
All that matters is if you are happy.
GoChiefs
Posts: 16,754
May 30, 2012 8:25am
ZWICK 4 PREZ;1184422 wrote:This makes no sense. It's faster stock so it's easier/cheaper to make it/keep it faster than it's counterparts. Chevy's motors don't respond as well to power adders like a SC as Ford's OHC motors. They do respond better kept N/A but internal motor work is EXPENSIVE... Keep using 19th century pushrod technology GM :/. Dodge..well their motors have always been underperformers for the size. /engineeringfail
How does it not make sense? Like I said, depends on how much money you are willing to throw under the hood.
GoChiefs
Posts: 16,754
May 30, 2012 8:32am
said_aouita;1184425 wrote:Did green lights and green pin stripping improve your quarter mile a lot?
It might help if I gave a shit about a quarter mile time? If all I cared about was speed, I'd by a race car. But since I'm a 4x4 guy, I dont care about speed at all.
said_aouita;1184425 wrote: Just kidding. Obviously good performance and a quality product was not your focus when you purchased that car.
Performs great for what I need to do and until now, I've only had to replace an A/C compressor in 85,000 miles. It's been a quality product as well.
ZWICK 4 PREZ
Posts: 7,733
May 30, 2012 8:40am
It doesn't make sense b/c you're not going to get any more HP outta the ls3 than you would out of the 5.0GoChiefs;1184466 wrote:How does it not make sense? Like I said, depends on how much money you are willing to throw under the hood.
You're just going to spend more money on the LS3 and the camaro's still going to be a heavy pig and lose.
GoChiefs
Posts: 16,754
May 30, 2012 8:45am
ZWICK 4 PREZ;1184490 wrote:It doesn't make sense b/c you're not going to get any more HP outta the ls3 than you would out of the 5.0
You're just going to spend more money on the LS3 and the camaro's still going to be a heavy pig and lose.
If you leave your Mustang stock, and I dropped 10k under the hood of the Camaro, the Camaro isn't going to lose.
ZWICK 4 PREZ
Posts: 7,733
May 30, 2012 8:51am
ooook... but if you drop 10 grand to make 800 horse on the ls3 and I drop 6 grand to make it 800 horse on the Coyote I'm still beating you and you're an idiot for spending 4 grand moreGoChiefs;1184500 wrote:If you leave your Mustang stock, and I dropped 10k under the hood of the Camaro, the Camaro isn't going to lose.
M
MontyBrunswick
May 30, 2012 9:41am
I drive an Hyundai Elantra and it gets about 38 mpg.ZWICK 4 PREZ;1184505 wrote:ooook... but if you drop 10 grand to make 800 horse on the ls3 and I drop 6 grand to make it 800 horse on the Coyote I'm still beating you and you're an idiot for spending 4 grand more
Fuck both of you.
skank
Posts: 6,543
May 30, 2012 9:42am
ZWICK 4 PREZ;1184490 wrote:It doesn't make sense b/c you're not going to get any more HP outta the ls3 than you would out of the 5.0
You're just going to spend more money on the LS3 and the camaro's still going to be a heavy pig and lose.
Haha^^^^
GoChiefs
Posts: 16,754
May 30, 2012 10:18am
ZWICK 4 PREZ;1184505 wrote:ooook... but if you drop 10 grand to make 800 horse on the ls3 and I drop 6 grand to make it 800 horse on the Coyote I'm still beating you and you're an idiot for spending 4 grand more
So thats when I spend more. Isn't that how the speed game works? If you wanna go faster, you gotta pay. Whether it be Ford, Chevy, or Dodge. Who cares which is faster stock? If speed is what you're worried about, I can always make one faster than the other if I really wanted to.
GoChiefs
Posts: 16,754
May 30, 2012 10:21am
skank;1184557 wrote:Haha^^^^
Are you 12 or something? Your obsession is becoming rather creepy. Don't you have some 16 or 17 year old boys you should be following around instead of me?
Fab1b
Posts: 12,949
May 30, 2012 10:27am
You guys still haven't figured out who's dick is bigger here?
GoChiefs
Posts: 16,754
May 30, 2012 10:39am
We get it, you don't care about cars.Fab1b;1184586 wrote:You guys still haven't figured out who's dick is bigger here?
ZWICK 4 PREZ
Posts: 7,733
May 30, 2012 10:45am
You can only add power to a point. It's not unlimited.GoChiefs;1184582 wrote:So thats when I spend more. Isn't that how the speed game works? If you wanna go faster, you gotta pay. Whether it be Ford, Chevy, or Dodge. Who cares which is faster stock? If speed is what you're worried about, I can always make one faster than the other if I really wanted to.
Devils Advocate
Posts: 4,539
Jul 3, 2012 4:45pm
hoops23
Posts: 15,696
Jul 3, 2012 11:46pm
I laughed at the flailing deer...Devils Advocate;1218002 wrote:
BRF
Posts: 8,748
Jul 4, 2012 12:00am
That is a very important clip to study.hoops23;1218219 wrote:I laughed at the flailing deer...
Sykotyk
Posts: 1,155
Jul 4, 2012 12:22am
That had to be a baby moose.