gerb131
Posts: 9,932
May 24, 2012 4:49pm
My pitbull is vicious toward a bowl of kibble and kibble only
W
WebFire
Posts: 14,779
May 24, 2012 8:54pm
No bits, eh?
dwccrew
Posts: 7,817
May 24, 2012 10:30pm
Duh, it doesn't take Alfred Einstein or Steven Hawk to figure that one out.WebFire;1181084 wrote:So one picture from the internet deems them all safe?
He's so gentle that no bite or bit in his kibble.WebFire;1181370 wrote:No bits, eh?
gerb131
Posts: 9,932
May 24, 2012 10:36pm
Only kibble for my girl I dont want her biting me
lhslep134
Posts: 9,774
May 24, 2012 11:13pm
Certain breeds are predispositioned towards certain behavior, to deny that is ignorant. But with a domesticated animal way more often than not it's nurture that shapes behavior not nature. This is the first time I've seen this thread so I don't know where that fits in with the dwwcrew/webfire thing apparently going on, but that's my opinion.
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
May 26, 2012 8:20am
This child crawled out of the pit bulls stomach so this picture could be taken. It's obvious that the dog had previously bitten & eaten the child since pit bulls "do that sort of thing...." :rolleyes:
W
WebFire
Posts: 14,779
May 26, 2012 9:35am
Haha. Somewhere you picked up the idea that because people think the breed as a whole is more vicious than others, then every single pit dog must be.BR1986FB;1182327 wrote:This child crawled out of the pit bulls stomach so this picture could be taken. It's obvious that the dog had previously bitten & eaten the child since pit bulls "do that sort of thing...." :rolleyes:
Another example of the sample of 1 I talked about in another thread. :rolleyes:
W
WebFire
Posts: 14,779
May 26, 2012 9:37am
Hey look. Giving kids a gun is ok. I have a picture to prove it!
V
vball10set
Posts: 24,795
May 26, 2012 10:09am
This was my contention, but it seemed to fall on deaf ears for some posters. Good post.lhslep134;1181529 wrote:Certain breeds are predispositioned towards certain behavior, to deny that is ignorant. But with a domesticated animal way more often than not it's nurture that shapes behavior not nature.
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
May 26, 2012 11:03am
Poor example, as you phrased it. If someone gave that kid the gun, just like someone training a pit bull to be a killer, they would in fact be encouraging the behavior. The kid wouldn't be "predisposed" to be a killer without the encouragement of putting the gun in his hands/giving him the idea.WebFire;1182343 wrote:Hey look. Giving kids a gun is ok. I have a picture to prove it!
W
WebFire
Posts: 14,779
May 26, 2012 12:15pm
But as long as we train him properly he should be able to carry. Right?BR1986FB;1182370 wrote:Poor example, as you phrased it. If someone gave that kid the gun, just like someone training a pit bull to be a killer, they would in fact be encouraging the behavior. The kid wouldn't be "predisposed" to be a killer without the encouragement of putting the gun in his hands/giving him the idea.
And my point was about examples. An example of one dog with a kid proves nothing. Just like the picture of the kid does not prove it's a good idea for kids to carry guns.
I
isadore
Posts: 7,762
May 26, 2012 7:24pm
and right afterwardBR1986FB;1182327 wrote:This child crawled out of the pit bulls stomach so this picture could be taken. It's obvious that the dog had previously bitten & eaten the child since pit bulls "do that sort of thing...." :rolleyes:
3 year-old Natylee Murphy following the attack of her Aunt's Pit Bull
hasbeen
Posts: 6,504
May 28, 2012 6:56pm
isadore;1182505 wrote:and right afterward
3 year-old Natylee Murphy following the attack of her Aunt's Pit Bull
I'm just glad a boxer didn't do that to her. Would hate to think my dog could do that.
Good thing only pit bulls are bad.
I
isadore
Posts: 7,762
May 28, 2012 7:26pm
pitt bulls are not good or bad, pitt bulls are dangerous. Of course you could not ask many of their victims because they are dead.
dwccrew
Posts: 7,817
May 29, 2012 10:03pm
Only the strong survive.isadore;1183377 wrote:pitt bulls are not good or bad, pitt bulls are dangerous. Of course you could not ask many of their victims because they are dead.
I
isadore
Posts: 7,762
May 29, 2012 11:07pm
the pitt bulls have preference for killing the weak, the old and the children
V
vball10set
Posts: 24,795
May 30, 2012 8:13am
*pit
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
May 30, 2012 8:40am
Yeah, because if a pit bull decides that it wants to attack someone it thinks "oh shit, that guy looks like he's healthy & in his 20's...better not attack him....now that 97 year old lady looks like easy prey...." :rolleyes: You're such a stupid fuck.isadore;1184343 wrote:the pitt bulls have preference for killing the weak, the old and the children
I
isadore
Posts: 7,762
May 30, 2012 9:22am
Yep that is actually how they do itBR1986FB;1184491 wrote:Yeah, because if a pit bull decides that it wants to attack someone it thinks "oh ****, that guy looks like he's healthy & in his 20's...better not attack him....now that 97 year old lady looks like easy prey...." :rolleyes: You're such a stupid ****.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fatal_dog_attacks_in_the_United_States
Fatalities from Pitt Bull and Pitt Bull mix attacks 2001-2012 (not include most recent 2012 attacks including killing of 3 day old baby by Pitt Bull in Beaverdam, Ohio last week)
53 child 3days old to 12 including 5 killings of children less than 10 days old
28 from 14 to 61 over half of these are women
25 from 65 to 90
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
May 30, 2012 9:27am
Well shit, since pit's are so smart and can differentiate between the young & old, healthy & non-healthy, I think I need to get one to clean my house, cook my dinner & go to work for me.isadore;1184532 wrote:Yep that is actually how they do it
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fatal_dog_attacks_in_the_United_States
Fatalities from Pitt Bull and Pitt Bull mix attacks 2001-2012 (not include most recent 2012 attacks including killing of 3 day old baby by Pitt Bull in Beaverdam, Ohio last week)
53 child 3days old to 12 including 5 killings of children less than 10 days old
28 from 14 to 61 over half of these are women
25 from 65 to 90
You might want to check into that "mental retardation" thing you have going for you. :rolleyes:
I
isadore
Posts: 7,762
May 30, 2012 9:35am
lol you are pathetic.
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
May 30, 2012 9:39am
You should take a serious look at YOUR posts sometime. :laugh:isadore;1184545 wrote:lol you are pathetic.
I
isadore
Posts: 7,762
May 30, 2012 9:42am
gosh a ruddies I prove my point with facts and you rave and whine. That is about it.
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
May 30, 2012 9:49am
You posted a fucking WIKIPEDIA link...FACTS?isadore;1184555 wrote:gosh a ruddies I prove my point with facts and you rave and whine. That is about it.
I
isadore
Posts: 7,762
May 30, 2012 9:52am
duh what educated people realize is you check the citations which take you to the primary sources which are listed with the article.