No, one is just bigger and stronger. The smaller cat actually has more bite stats.Glory Days;1187478 wrote:
clearly these cats are both equally dangerous.
isadore;1186678 wrote:yes the basic stats, pit bulls kill far more people than any other dog, they have a preference for the very young and very old.
Way to contradict yourself.You get caught using a stat seemingly supports your case, but is completely at odds with real truth and you try to weasel out of it claiming you were focused elsewhere.
Baby killer ! Baby killer! Put it down !!!! :rolleyes:
Gosh I realize that understand reading comprehension must be problem. This is what that section of my conversation with O-trap was about.Raw Dawgin' it;1188229 wrote:Way to contradict yourself.
O-trap wrote:False. Statistics in that same 2011 report showed that most victims killed were between 32 and 60.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of..._United_Statesisadore wrote:As to your 2011 stat that most of the killed were 32-60. Lets do it right over an extended period of time from 2001 to early 2012. From ages 3 days to 12 years 53 Pit bull killings, from ages 14 to 61 years 28 killing by Pit Bulls and from ages 65 to 90 25 killed by Pit Bulls. They love to kill the very young and the very old.
　O-trap wrote:Actually, I used a truthful claim that was not indicative of the whole,
Just before 8pm Saturday, deputies were called to a home in the 27000 block of Medina Circle in far west Montgomery County. When deputies arrived and entered the home, they found a one-year-old boy had been brutally mauled to death by the family's pit bull.BR1986FB;1188273 wrote:Baby killer ! Baby killer! Put it down !!!! :rolleyes:
isadore;1188302 wrote:Just before 8pm Saturday, deputies were called to a home in the 27000 block of Medina Circle in far west Montgomery County. When deputies arrived and entered the home, they found a one-year-old boy had been brutally mauled to death by the family's pit bull.
http://abclocal.go.com/ktrk/story?section=news/local&id=8505754
And you base every argument of yours off of the "appeal to emotion" fallacy.isadore;1188314 wrote:you are heartless and pathetic.
lol a 45yr old grandmother? Sounds like the baby was redeemed for being born into such a terrible family. The mother doesn't even know her baby is dead yet you blame the dog?The baby was inside the home with his grandmother when he was attacked. The 45-year-old grandmother was not injured by the dog, but authorities say she had to be taken by ambulance to a local hospital due to emotional trauma.
The call for help was made by the victim's grandfather when he arrived home. The victim and his mother had just recently moved in with the grandparents, according to the sheriff's office. The child's mother had left the home earlier in the day and has not been located by detectives.
Raw Dawgin' it;1188319 wrote:lol a 45yr old grandmother? Sounds like the baby was redeemed for being born into such a terrible family. The mother doesn't even know her baby is dead yet you blame the dog?
the death of a child should arouse emotion, except in those who value the right to own a dog above human life.LJ;1188316 wrote:And you base every argument of yours off of the "appeal to emotion" fallacy.
Yep.isadore;1188444 wrote:the death of a child should arouse emotion, except in those who value the right to own a dog above human life.
He cherrypicks, lhs. Just Googles "pit bull deaths" or some shit like that and posts from the FEW stories that there are.lhslep134;1188454 wrote:Yep.
http://articles.nydailynews.com/2012-04-22/news/31383925_1_police-officers-pooch-beautiful-dog
Damn shame about that baby who died from the jaws of a Golden Retriever mix.
cherry picking it going for unusual, pit bulls killing kids is not unusual.BR1986FB;1188456 wrote:He cherrypicks, lhs. Just Googles "pit bull deaths" or some **** like that and posts from the FEW stories that there are.
Your definition of unusual is insufficient if you think that any dog killing a kid is not unusual.isadore;1188466 wrote:cherry picking it going for unusual, pit bulls killing kids is not unusual.
gosh the 100 plus people that pits have killed in the last decade, the 50 plus kids they have torn apart, should give any decent person cause to reflect if these killers belong among us.lhslep134;1188467 wrote:Your definition of unusual is insufficient if you think that any dog killing a kid is not unusual.
isadore;1188489 wrote:gosh the 100 plus people that pits have killed in the last decade, the 50 plus kids they have torn apart, should give any decent person cause to reflect if these killers belong among us.
no 100 plus dead peopleLJ;1188490 wrote:Appeal to emotions fallacy
And a mother who couldn't even be found after her child was attacked...skank;1188436 wrote:I agree....BUT.
I think you're looking at it like, "what a terrible family, the grandma is only 45".
I on the other hand am looking at it like this, What a terrible family, the had a pitbull around an infant.