S
sportchampps
Posts: 7,361
May 5, 2012 1:15pm
When I lived in Kansas they were very trigger happy with the warnings. Any storm basically would get a warning.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/241f9/241f9d4fe5410d9a5e43866e5e348cd864e54220" alt="Classyposter58's avatar"
Classyposter58
Posts: 6,321
May 5, 2012 5:28pm
NWS Cleveland doesn't care about NW Ohio though. But radar warnings are not a joke. It's easy to spot a tornado on radar if you've got proper software and believe me, they do
W
WebFire
Posts: 14,779
May 5, 2012 8:31pm
I disagree. I'd be interested to know the % of warnings that never even produce a funnel in the sky, let alone one on the ground. I bet it's high. The gap has narrowed so much between what a watch and warning is.Classyposter58;1163316 wrote:NWS Cleveland doesn't care about NW Ohio though. But radar warnings are not a joke. It's easy to spot a tornado on radar if you've got proper software and believe me, they do
The problem with that is people seem to be taking warnings less seriously with each one that passes by with merely a rumble of thunder.