sleeper;1140033 wrote:I like the Wahoo symbol. If the Wahoo symbol was removed, my level of happiness would decline immensely. These groups are infringing on my right to be happy.

See how that works? You really want to live in a country where we defend the few who QQ over the majority who enjoy the symbol? It's a slippery slope and we all know what happens after the first step on the slope.

Then let it slide down the slope . we have the free exchange of ideas, debate, leading to action. That is what it is all about. If the team decide to replace the image, you can organize and boycott for chief wahoo. You can begin White Americans Hollering Overbearing Offensiveness.

Al Bundy;1140046 wrote:

isadore;1140031 wrote:Hey the fact that many of us Irish are not offended by fighting Irish, is our choiceQUOTE] Most native Americans are not offended by Chief Wahoo either. It is a small minority that are doing the protests. What percent of a group as to be offended to make it an issue? I am part Irish, and I would tell anyone leading a protest againt the ND mascot to find something better to do with their time.

And that would be your opinion, but its their opinion that it is offensive and if its that important to them they should act.

OSH;1139994 wrote:Great post.

I have no problems with anyone protesting the team name.

The Chief Wahoo mascot is about as racist as it comes. Could you imagine if there were any mascots that looked like this:

It won't happen. It doesn't make sense to have mascots that are stereotyping a people group -- like the Indians, Braves, Fighting [insert name here], and/or Warriors.

Warriors? You've gotta be kidding me. There is no possible way you can claim that Warriors is offensive.

isadore;1140049 wrote:Then let it slide down the slope . we have the free exchange of ideas, debate, leading to action. That is what it is all about. If the team decide to replace the image, you can organize and boycott for chief wahoo. You can begin White Americans Hollering Overbearing Offensiveness.

Might as well just give everyone $10,000 a year in cash, free phones, free housing, free healthcare, free food, free car, free sex, free children, etc. That way we can all live in peace and harmoney and kumbaya. :rolleyes:

GOONx19;1140060 wrote:Warriors? You've gotta be kidding me. There is no possible way you can claim that Warriors is offensive.

maybe he is a Quaker or part of the Amish OC contingent.

sleeper;1140065 wrote:Might as well just give everyone $10,000 a year in cash, free phones, free housing, free healthcare, free food, free car, free sex, free children, etc. That way we can all live in peace and harmoney and kumbaya. :rolleyes:

Better throw in a free iPad

If there's one thing I understand in discussions that pertain to this topic, there really is no convincing ANYONE if they don't understand how demeaning it is for the stererotypical imagery and language.

The "Redskins" name is derogatory. There is no "pussification," "pansified," or "whining" going on. It is a derogatory name. Especially when you couple it with feathers, tomahawks, and Native American caricatures. Same goes for "Indians" or "Braves" or "Warriors." We are talking about a group of people who were invaded, massacred, slaughtered, and pushed out of their land. The Native Americans became the "lowly" of society. Heck, many still classify them as such. So, what do we do to "honor" them...we use stereotypical imagery and language to profit off of their "plight."

Could you imagine a German company, university, or professional team using Jewish imagery and language to make a profit off of it? That would definitely not be okay. What if an Republic of Ireland or Northern Ireland company, university or professional team used the Catholic/Protestant conflict to make a buck? We have already alluded to using African-American (or any dark-skinned) stereotypical imagery and language would never be used -- outside of potentially the Negro Leagues. We'd definitely never see any Asian stereotypical imagery and language used by companies, universities, or professional teams.

Could you imagine seeing a team called the "Ricemen?" With a caricature with slant-eyes, straw hat, and smiling? No way. And it should stay that way. Oh, but we were just "honoring" the rice-growing heritage of the area...right...lame.

Team names of "Dolphins," Tigers," "Lions," and other animals/plants/music/etc. are not profitting off of a people group that was slaughtered, invaded, etc. Even mascots like "Vikings" or "Fighting Irish" aren't making any bucks off the plight of other people groups. There is a fine line...and MANY teams/universities have crossed it.

sleeper;1140065 wrote:Might as well just give everyone $10,000 a year in cash, free phones, free housing, free healthcare, free food, free car, free sex, free children, etc. That way we can all live in peace and harmoney and kumbaya. :rolleyes:

I dont particularly want free children, but free child care would be nice and so would the rest, it would be fucking great. It would help me live in peace and harmony.

GOONx19;1140060 wrote:Warriors? You've gotta be kidding me. There is no possible way you can claim that Warriors is offensive.

It is when Warriors is used directly with Native American imagery. Not by itself, you are right.

It wasn't too long ago where the Golden State [i.e. Philadelphia] Warriors used this logo:

isadore;1140075 wrote:I dont particularly want free children, but free child care would be nice and so would the rest, it would be fucking great. It would help me live in peace and harmony.

It would be. Get a job and pay for it yourself. Nothing in this world is "free", its just someone who doesn't owe you anything getting it up the butt so you can spend more of your money on things you don't need.

That logo hasn't been used in 50 years.

They dissociated themselves with Native American connotation when they moved to California.

sleeper;1140084 wrote:It would be. Get a job and pay for it yourself. Nothing in this world is "free", its just someone who doesn't owe you anything getting it up the butt so you can spend more of your money on things you don't need.

I thought that was an offer. What an Indian giver you are!!!!

GOONx19;1140085 wrote:That logo hasn't been used in 50 years.

Correct. But I just inserted Warriors in there because of that.

I would venture a guess that there are other teams (university or high school) that use the same mascot but use similar imagery -- either an arrowhead, tomahawk, feather, etc.

isadore;1140088 wrote:I thought that was an offer. What an Indian giver you are!!!!

Racist! How dare you use the word "Indian"; that is our word.

sleeper;1140093 wrote:Racist! How dare you use the word "Indian"; that is our word.

True, it is definitely is a white man's word for the indigenous population of the Americas.

isadore;1140108 wrote:True, it is definitely is a white man's word for the indigenous population of the Americas.

Are you white isadore?

sleeper;1140110 wrote:Are you white isadore?

in part.

OSH;1140071 wrote:

Team names of "Dolphins," Tigers," "Lions," and other animals/plants/music/etc. are not profitting off of a people group that was slaughtered, invaded, etc. Even mascots like "Vikings" or "Fighting Irish" aren't making any bucks off the plight of other people groups. There is a fine line...and MANY teams/universities have crossed it.

The LSU tigers are named after the Tiger brigade during the Civil War. The Vikings whole wrath of terror was based upon the plight of others. The Irish had it horrible when England stole their land and starved their people.

isadore;1140111 wrote:in part.

I feel like you hate yourself because you are white. Do you wish you were a minority?

Al Bundy;1140114 wrote:The LSU tigers are named after the Tiger brigade during the Civil War. The Vikings whole wrath of terror was based upon the plight of others. The Irish had it horrible when England stole their land and starved their people.

The Cougars is offensive to old ladies who like younger men.

sleeper;1140117 wrote:I feel like you hate yourself because you are white. Do you wish you were a minority?

hardly I am just happy to be part of the broad racial spectrum that make up America. It is sad for you that your latent self hatred has caused you to overcompensate in your defense of white privilege.

sleeper;1140118 wrote:The Cougars is offensive to old ladies who like younger men.

And you are pretty much offensive to everyone on here......Your point is?

isadore;1140126 wrote:hardly I am just happy to be part of the broad racial spectrum that make up America. It is sad for you that your latent self hatred has caused you to overcompensate in your defense of white privilege.

Everything I get in life is because I am white. I got free school because I'm white, I got a job because I'm white, I get free money from my grandparents because I'm white, I get to play the victim whenever I want because I'm white, I get to vote because I'm white, I stay out of jail because I'm white, etc. I am truly thankful to be white. If I was a minority, my life would be so hard.

Devils Advocate;1140128 wrote:And you are pretty much offensive to everyone on here......Your point is?

Your feelings are none of my concern.