Archive 2012 NFL Random Chatter

Iliketurtles

Posts: 8,191

Mar 19, 2012 11:56am

Manning to the Broncos! Crazy.. Bye bye Tebow!!

like_that

Posts: 26,625

Mar 19, 2012 7:12pm

http://deadspin.com/5894499/did-a-16+year+old-mass-lass-hook-up-with-rob-gronkowski-one-steamy-night-in-aruba

lol

shook_17

Posts: 3,023

Mar 19, 2012 7:24pm

gronk gettin em when they are young. get it done! :thumbup:

Mr Miyagi

Posts: 1,211

Mar 20, 2012 3:17pm

NFL Network reporting that 5 teams have inquired about Tebow , one of them being the Patriots

shook_17

Posts: 3,023

Mar 20, 2012 4:05pm

^^ seen something on pro football talk that the jets have inquired about him and talking trade cromartie for tebow straight up.

B

BR1986FB

Posts: 24,104

Mar 20, 2012 7:19pm

Damn...

John McClain ‏ @
McClain_on_NFL

Texans are trading MLB DeMeco Ryans to Eagles for undisclosed draft
choice. The trade is contingent on Ryans' passing a physical Wednesday

like_that

Posts: 26,625

Mar 20, 2012 7:24pm

BR1986FB;1122441 wrote:Damn...

John McClain ‏ @
McClain_on_NFL
Texans are trading MLB DeMeco Ryans to Eagles for undisclosed draft
choice. The trade is contingent on Ryans' passing a physical Wednesday

Why???

B

BR1986FB

Posts: 24,104

Mar 20, 2012 7:28pm

like_that;1122443 wrote:Why???

Iggles need LB's. When Casey Matthews is starting, you have issues.

like_that

Posts: 26,625

Mar 20, 2012 7:29pm

BR1986FB;1122445 wrote:Iggles need LB's. When Casey Matthews is starting, you have issues.

Yeah I know that, im just wondering why the Texans would want to trade away a big piece of their defense. Mario is already gone.

B

BR1986FB

Posts: 24,104

Mar 20, 2012 7:31pm

like_that;1122446 wrote:Yeah I know that, im just wondering why the Texans would want to trade away a big piece of their defense. Mario is already gone.

Probably got a nice offer.

EDIT: I stand corrected...only a mid-rounder but Ryans no longer fits their 3-4 scheme. He's a tackling machine as a 4-3 MLB.

like_that

Posts: 26,625

Mar 20, 2012 7:47pm

BR1986FB;1122447 wrote:Probably got a nice offer.

EDIT: I stand corrected...only a mid-rounder but Ryans no longer fits their 3-4 scheme. He's a tackling machine as a 4-3 MLB.

Well fuck, I would have taken him in a heart beat for a mid-rounder. Are the Texans kidding me? They wouldn't part ways with their backup RB unless it was a 2nd rd pick, but they are going to give up Ryans for a mid rounder?

lhslep134

Posts: 9,774

Mar 20, 2012 7:55pm

I would have gladly given up a 3rd for Ryans.

B

BR1986FB

Posts: 24,104

Mar 20, 2012 7:59pm

4th rounder...believe they also swapped 2012 3rd's in the deal.

like_that

Posts: 26,625

Mar 20, 2012 8:01pm

BR1986FB;1122465 wrote:4th rounder...believe they also swapped 2012 3rd's in the deal.

That's insane.

B

BR1986FB

Posts: 24,104

Mar 20, 2012 8:05pm

like_that;1122457 wrote: They wouldn't part ways with their backup RB unless it was a 2nd rd pick, but they are going to give up Ryans for a mid rounder?

The difference is that Tate was still in their plans, Ryans wasn't.

Commander of Awesome

Posts: 23,151

Mar 20, 2012 8:11pm

I remember when the Browns wanted Ryans, and he was snapped up one pick before the spot we traded to. We "settled" for DQ. I remember being pissed at that time, guess it worked out resonably well.

Mr Miyagi

Posts: 1,211

Mar 20, 2012 9:21pm

If Tim Tebow does not sign with another team, he will be eligible for the Hall of Fame in 5 years, 1st year eligble , and in....shouldn't be a problem

/skyhook

Skyhook79

Posts: 5,739

Mar 20, 2012 9:40pm

Mr Miyagi;1122518 wrote:If Tim Tebow does not sign with another team, he will be eligible for the Hall of Fame in 5 years, 1st year eligble , and in....shouldn't be a problem

/skyhook

Not surprised you had to edit that and it's /skyhook'd. :rolleyes:

SportsAndLady

Posts: 35,632

Mar 20, 2012 9:54pm

His .500 playoff record is better than Peyton Mannings!!!

Skyhook79

Posts: 5,739

Mar 20, 2012 9:57pm

SportsAndLady;1122549 wrote:His .500 playoff record is better than Peyton Mannings!!!

Fact.

9-10 is awful for one the "all time greats"

Laley23

Posts: 29,506

Mar 20, 2012 10:06pm

Skyhook79;1122552 wrote:Fact.

9-10 is awful for one the "all time greats"

Serious question. When did the 1st round bye come into play? Because I assume some older guys got a game they "should win" in their careers. Obviously its not a guarantee in the NFL. But if he played in the older days without the bye, he has a much more respectable record, imo.

Skyhook79

Posts: 5,739

Mar 20, 2012 10:19pm

Laley23;1122557 wrote:Serious question. When did the 1st round bye come into play? Because I assume some older guys got a game they "should win" in their careers. Obviously its not a guarantee in the NFL. But if he played in the older days without the bye, he has a much more respectable record, imo.

The Colts had a bye 4 times in Mannings 14 years there. He won his only Super Bowl as a Wild Card. The bye has been around for a while at least 30 years I believe.

shook_17

Posts: 3,023

Mar 20, 2012 10:21pm

Mr Miyagi;1122518 wrote:If Tim Tebow does not sign with another team, he will be eligible for the Hall of Fame in 5 years, 1st year eligble , and in....shouldn't be a problem

/skyhook

haha. that made me lol

DeyDurkie5

Posts: 11,324

Mar 20, 2012 10:47pm

Skyhook79;1122552 wrote:Fact.

9-10 is awful for one the "all time greats"

19 playoff games for peyton as a starter

2 for tebow as a starter

how's tebow's cum taste?

SportsAndLady

Posts: 35,632

Mar 20, 2012 11:00pm

10 playoff loses is actually an impressive stat...with 1 SB win, that's 11 postseasons. Impressive.

Not to mention you're averaging almost 1 win in those postseasons, so you're actually averaging the AFCCG when you go to the playoffs. Not bad.

But yeah, 1-1 is definitely better.