2012 NFL Random Chatter

Home Archive Pro Sports 2012 NFL Random Chatter
SportsAndLady's avatar

SportsAndLady

Senior Member

35,632 posts
Oct 22, 2012 1:52 PM
I brought Weeden into the convo because you said flaccos game was the lowest rated since 08 which to me was hilarious because no way weedens game was better than flaccos. Then your butt ached when you responded with NEAT. Sorry I was making a random comment on something, it won't happen again Mr LJ sir.
Oct 22, 2012 1:52pm
LJ's avatar

LJ

Senior Member

16,351 posts
Oct 22, 2012 1:53 PM
like_that;1301695 wrote:a*

Thanks, you should send an email to handcent and let them know their auto correct keeps screwing up.
Oct 22, 2012 1:53pm
LJ's avatar

LJ

Senior Member

16,351 posts
Oct 22, 2012 1:54 PM
SportsAndLady;1301696 wrote:I brought Weeden into the convo because you said flaccos game was the lowest rated since 08 which to me was hilarious because no way weedens game was better than flaccos. Then your butt ached when you responded with NEAT. Sorry I was making a random comment on something, it won't happen again Mr LJ sir.

My butt feels fine, thanks.
Oct 22, 2012 1:54pm
SportsAndLady's avatar

SportsAndLady

Senior Member

35,632 posts
Oct 22, 2012 2:02 PM
LJ;1301699 wrote:My butt feels fine, thanks.
As long as you realize that posting NEAT in response to someone trying to have a conversation makes you come off as a giant dick, I can take from this convo you're not butthurt.
Oct 22, 2012 2:02pm
like_that's avatar

like_that

1st Team All-PWN

26,625 posts
Oct 22, 2012 2:03 PM
SportsAndLady;1301713 wrote:As long as you realize that posting NEAT in response to someone trying to have a conversation makes you come off as a giant dick, I can take from this convo you're not butthurt.
Whatever he felt (most likely butt hurt), he wasn't a fan of your response.
Oct 22, 2012 2:03pm
justincredible's avatar

justincredible

Nick Mangold

32,056 posts
Oct 22, 2012 2:03 PM
Can we all agree that this conversation is going nowhere and change the subject before this thread gets even more polluted with bickering?
Oct 22, 2012 2:03pm
like_that's avatar

like_that

1st Team All-PWN

26,625 posts
Oct 22, 2012 2:18 PM
justincredible;1301715 wrote:Can we all agree that this conversation is going nowhere and change the subject before this thread gets even more polluted with bickering?
Sure.

What will be the worst record to get into the AFC playoffs. I think there is a good chance we see a 7-9 get in.
Oct 22, 2012 2:18pm
Rotinaj's avatar

Rotinaj

Senior Member

7,699 posts
Oct 22, 2012 2:45 PM
I think both wild card teams will be 9-7. Maybe 1 8-8.
Oct 22, 2012 2:45pm
justincredible's avatar

justincredible

Nick Mangold

32,056 posts
Oct 22, 2012 2:52 PM
like_that;1301733 wrote:Sure.

What will be the worst record to get into the AFC playoffs. I think there is a good chance we see a 7-9 get in.
Based on my calculations the top seed will be 11-5 and there will be some shitty teams squeak in. I see at least one 8-8 team and one will probably be a division winner (West). I think the Pats win the East at 9-7 or 10-6. And as shitty as the Jets are I think they have a decent shot at a wild card at 8-8 or 9-7.
Oct 22, 2012 2:52pm
SportsAndLady's avatar

SportsAndLady

Senior Member

35,632 posts
Oct 22, 2012 2:57 PM
justincredible;1301786 wrote:Based on my calculations the top seed will be 11-5 and there will be some shitty teams squeak in. I see at least one 8-8 team and one will probably be a division winner (West). I think the Pats win the East at 9-7 or 10-6. And as shitty as the Jets are I think they have a decent shot at a wild card at 8-8 or 9-7.
NEAT
Oct 22, 2012 2:57pm
gorocks99's avatar

gorocks99

Senior Member

10,760 posts
Oct 22, 2012 2:59 PM
justincredible;1301786 wrote:Based on my calculations the top seed will be 11-5 and there will be some shitty teams squeak in. I see at least one 8-8 team and one will probably be a division winner (West). I think the Pats win the East at 9-7 or 10-6. And as shitty as the Jets are I think they have a decent shot at a wild card at 8-8 or 9-7.
I was thinking the winner of the West would be 8-8 but then I saw Denver's remaining schedule...

vs New Orleans
@ Cincinnati
@ Carolina
vs San Diego
@ KC
vs Tampa
@ Oakland
@ Baltimore
vs Cleveland
vs KC

They get four of the worst five teams in the league (KC, Cleveland, Oakland, Carolina) for five of their last 10, plus home games against FAILip Rivers (love that), Tampa, and 2-4 New Orleans. If they can't muster six wins with that schedule, fuck 'em.
Oct 22, 2012 2:59pm
Raw Dawgin' it's avatar

Raw Dawgin' it

Just Ain't Care

11,466 posts
Oct 22, 2012 3:07 PM
justincredible;1301786 wrote:Based on my calculations the top seed will be 11-5 and there will be some shitty teams squeak in. I see at least one 8-8 team and one will probably be a division winner (West). I think the Pats win the East at 9-7 or 10-6. And as shitty as the Jets are I think they have a decent shot at a wild card at 8-8 or 9-7.
Last year the patriots were 5-3 after 8 and went to the super bowl. GTFO with 9-7
Oct 22, 2012 3:07pm
justincredible's avatar

justincredible

Nick Mangold

32,056 posts
Oct 22, 2012 3:19 PM
Raw Dawgin' it;1301813 wrote:Last year the patriots were 5-3 after 8 and went to the super bowl. GTFO with 9-7
Oh. Okay.
Oct 22, 2012 3:19pm
Raw Dawgin' it's avatar

Raw Dawgin' it

Just Ain't Care

11,466 posts
Oct 22, 2012 3:26 PM
justincredible;1301824 wrote:Oh. Okay.
Jets ever win the super bowl with sanchez and ryan I'd stop watching football.
Oct 22, 2012 3:26pm
justincredible's avatar

justincredible

Nick Mangold

32,056 posts
Oct 22, 2012 3:33 PM
Raw Dawgin' it;1301830 wrote:Jets ever win the super bowl with sanchez and ryan I'd stop watching football.
Yeah, I get it, you hate the Jets, Mark Sanchez, and Rex Ryan. Sorry I rustled your jimmies with my Pats prediction.
Oct 22, 2012 3:33pm
Crimson streak's avatar

Crimson streak

Senior Member

9,002 posts
Oct 22, 2012 3:59 PM
gorocks99;1301810 wrote:Charles Woodson out 6 weeks w/ a broken collarbone: https://twitter.com/JayGlazer/status/260452763488624641

Couldn't have happened to a better person...
Oct 22, 2012 3:59pm
gorocks99's avatar

gorocks99

Senior Member

10,760 posts
Oct 22, 2012 6:18 PM
MJD with a potential lisfranc injury (aka season's over)
Oct 22, 2012 6:18pm
Ironman92's avatar

Ironman92

Administrator

49,363 posts
Oct 22, 2012 7:45 PM
like_that;1301482 wrote:Yeah yeah, you are butt hurt, we get it.

Anyway, anyone hear about the charges cheating? http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/blog/nfl-rapidreports/20632545/chargers-accused-of-cheating-with-illegal-stickum

Why would anyone need to use stickem? Anyone who has ever put on those $50 receiver gloves knows stickem can't do anything those gloves don't.....you could palm a bowling ball with them.
Oct 22, 2012 7:45pm
like_that's avatar

like_that

1st Team All-PWN

26,625 posts
Oct 22, 2012 8:04 PM
Ironman92;1302019 wrote:Why would anyone need to use stickem? Anyone who has ever put on those $50 receiver gloves knows stickem can't do anything those gloves don't.....you could palm a bowling ball with them.
Watch Greg Little play football, and there is the answer to your question.
Oct 22, 2012 8:04pm
Ironman92's avatar

Ironman92

Administrator

49,363 posts
Oct 22, 2012 8:08 PM
like_that;1302028 wrote:Watch Greg Little play football, and there is the answer to your question.

Yeah....Mike Wallace needed a clothes basket to catch anything last night.

Have you ever had a pair of those on or even felt where the ball would hit the glove? The first time I saw them were the month after OSU played Oregon? And when you put the gloves together they looked like an "O"...saw them at Champs
Oct 22, 2012 8:08pm
SportsAndLady's avatar

SportsAndLady

Senior Member

35,632 posts
Oct 22, 2012 9:29 PM
Gruden has the nerve to say "You like every city, Mike"

If I was Tirico I'd be like ya well you slobber every QB's ****, Jon, but you don't see me telling the world.
Oct 22, 2012 9:29pm
Terry_Tate's avatar

Terry_Tate

Senior Member

7,606 posts
Oct 23, 2012 5:30 PM
For the stats nerds and those who have time to kill, I saw @ESPNStatsInfo tweet about an article comparing RG III and Andrew Luck. It uses the dreaded QBR but it's a good analysis comparing the differences between the 2 of them so far. Would be interesting to see the stats compared for all rookie QBs.

http://fifthdown.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/10/23/luck-vs-griffin-a-statistical-comparison/?ref=football
Oct 23, 2012 5:30pm
like_that's avatar

like_that

1st Team All-PWN

26,625 posts
Oct 23, 2012 7:16 PM
Terry_Tate;1302981 wrote:For the stats nerds and those who have time to kill, I saw @ESPNStatsInfo tweet about an article comparing RG III and Andrew Luck. It uses the dreaded QBR but it's a good analysis comparing the differences between the 2 of them so far. Would be interesting to see the stats compared for all rookie QBs.

http://fifthdown.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/10/23/luck-vs-griffin-a-statistical-comparison/?ref=football
NEAT.

/LJ
Oct 23, 2012 7:16pm
B

BR1986FB

Senior Member

24,104 posts
Oct 24, 2012 7:46 AM
Terry_Tate;1302981 wrote:For the stats nerds and those who have time to kill, I saw @ESPNStatsInfo tweet about an article comparing RG III and Andrew Luck. It uses the dreaded QBR but it's a good analysis comparing the differences between the 2 of them so far. Would be interesting to see the stats compared for all rookie QBs.

http://fifthdown.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/10/23/luck-vs-griffin-a-statistical-comparison/?ref=football
Here's this year's rooks...

Andrew Luck: 1674 yards, 7 TD, 7 INT, (3 RUSH TD) - 72.3 Quarterback Rating - 3-3 Record

Robert Griffin III: 1601 yards, 7 TD, 3 INT, (6 RUSH TD) – 101.8 Quarterback Rating - 3-4 Record

Ryan Tannehill: 1454 yards, 4 TD, 6 INT, (1 RUSH TD) - 76.5 Quarterback Rating -3-3 Record

Brandon Weeden: 1783 yards, 9 TD, 10 INT, (0 RUSH TD) – 72.3 Quarterback Rating - 1-6 Record
Russell Wilson: 1230 yards, 8 TD, 7 INT, (0 RUSH TD) – 79.5 Quarterback Rating - 4-3 Record
Oct 24, 2012 7:46am