It is a very good analogy.Laley23;1106181 wrote:I stand by my analogy.
Yeah, Izzo finished right around where most had them (at least that I remember). Which was top 3.centralbucksfan;1106958 wrote:I would agree with this. But everyone wants to look at MSU going into the season unranked, then doing so well. When in reality, Izzo did have talent coming back. They also seem to forget they lost their last 2 games of the season, and VERY lucky it wasn't their last 3 games. He did a nice job. But I think many went overboard on him this year to be honest.
Think I would have ranked them:Laley23;1106972 wrote:Yeah, Izzo finished right around where most had them (at least that I remember). Which was top 3.
I still think it should have been Crean then Izzo. Beilien as a VERY close 3rd.
Agreedcentralbucksfan;1106979 wrote:Think I would have ranked them:
1. Crean
2. Beilien
3. Izzo
Probably better actually. Keep forgetting Bielien got a title lol. UofM winning the B1G is the 2nd best season behind IU, imo.centralbucksfan;1106979 wrote:Think I would have ranked them:
1. Crean
2. Beilien
3. Izzo
fifyLaley23;1107034 wrote:Probably better actually. Keep forgetting Bielien got a title lol. UofM sharing the B1G is the 2nd best season behind IU, imo.
Didn't fix shit! They got a title, just as osu and msu did lolvball10set;1107052 wrote:fify
I know, I know...just like they shared the 1997 NC with NebraskaLaley23;1107065 wrote:Didn't fix ****! They got a title, just as osu and msu did lol
Lol, I'm a taac guy who went tO mv. So these games should be solidvball10set;1107075 wrote:I know, I know...just like they shared the 1997 NC with Nebraska
btw, don't let T Dunc make you nervous tonight--speak clearly and DON'T STUTTER!!! lol