G
gut
Posts: 15,058
Feb 17, 2012 12:35am
5. Nicki Minajrmolin73;1087362 wrote:These guys know nothing.
http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/290789/20120131/kate-upton-askmen-desirable-hottest-photos-woman.htm
8. Kim Kardashian
18. Lady Gaga
22. Kate Beckinsale
23. Olivia Wilde
24. Jessica Alba
Solid list :thumbdown:
rmolin73
Posts: 4,278
Feb 17, 2012 2:47am
rmolin73
Posts: 4,278
Feb 17, 2012 2:49am
jordo212000
Posts: 10,664
Feb 17, 2012 7:00am
rmolin73;1088561 wrote:
Man oh man
rmolin73
Posts: 4,278
Feb 17, 2012 7:28am
Skyhook79
Posts: 5,739
Feb 17, 2012 9:50am
92. Adelegut;1088525 wrote:5. Nicki Minaj
8. Kim Kardashian
18. Lady Gaga
22. Kate Beckinsale
23. Olivia Wilde
24. Jessica Alba
Solid list :thumbdown:
93. Jennifer Lopez
96. Megan Fox
97. Tina Fey
even more solid.
At least Lopez and Fox were able to squeak ahead of Tina Fey. I wonder if thats Tina as herself or Sarah Palin?
S
sjmvsfscs08
Posts: 2,963
Feb 17, 2012 12:52pm
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Feb 17, 2012 2:06pm
V
vball10set
Posts: 24,795
Feb 17, 2012 2:13pm
V
vball10set
Posts: 24,795
Feb 17, 2012 2:14pm
bases_loaded
Posts: 6,912
Feb 17, 2012 2:29pm
Raw Dawgin' it
Posts: 11,466
Feb 17, 2012 2:30pm
I still don't get how her pussy isn't showing at all...i'm sure there was lots of touching up down there
Ironman92
Posts: 49,363
Feb 17, 2012 5:16pm
Skyhook79;1088671 wrote:92. Adele
93. Jennifer Lopez
96. Megan Fox
97. Tina Fey
even more solid.
Lopez and Fox behind Adele
This might be the least valid list ever. Adele? 3 billion women in the world....maybe a billion between the ages of 18-50.....I can't argue Adele being in the top 200,000,000 million.
rmolin73
Posts: 4,278
Feb 17, 2012 5:38pm
Hahahaha I agree I posted a bad list which is probably the worst list ever.
G
gut
Posts: 15,058
Feb 18, 2012 12:44am
I'll admit....Kate's BODY is definitely in the running for #1. But how much better and how much do you weight that? I put a lot more weight on the face (because it's not like any girl in such competition doesn't have a ridiculously great body) and that's where she's far less remarkable.
S
sjmvsfscs08
Posts: 2,963
Feb 18, 2012 1:19am
^^Agreed. She has a smokin' hot body, but her face, while registering highly on the cute scale, is nothing to write home about. She's still a 9.9/10 though in my book.
G
gut
Posts: 15,058
Feb 18, 2012 2:03am
Absolutely....But does a 9.9 even make it into my competition for a top-10? No.sjmvsfscs08;1089389 wrote:^^Agreed. She has a smokin' hot body, but her face, while registering highly on the cute scale, is nothing to write home about. She's still a 9.9/10 though in my book.
Maybe the best way I can explain it is, there are several pictures in this thread where I go "oh, wow, maybe I was wrong....maybe I just haven't seen the right pictures". And every time those have turned out to be pictures of Brooklyn Decker. It's not that Kate isn't phenomenally gorgeous and almost perfect, but she's missing/lacking something. And that's the difference between a top-10 "perfect 10" and hundreds of "almost". Honestly, IMO, what has enabled Kate to rise from that crowd is some great viral marketing and, perhaps, the "girl-next-door" look being the new unique/different after a parade of such truly unique/different beauties in various venues.
To be fair, my perception of Kate could change over the next 4-5 years as her face matures a bit. I think some of my bias can be attributed to her being/looking younger than the age I would consider most women to be their most beautiful (mid-20's, on average, for those that maintain that rockin' 18-yr old figure).
said_aouita
Posts: 8,532
Feb 18, 2012 4:11am
Not that hot of a picture. Stupid.rmolin73;1088561 wrote:
V
vball10set
Posts: 24,795
Feb 18, 2012 7:08am
^^^more creepy than stupid--she looks like a mannequin
oberhaus
Posts: 868
Feb 18, 2012 8:10am
vball10set;1089415 wrote:^^^more creepy than stupid--she looks like a mannequin
That pic is HOT.
rmolin73
Posts: 4,278
Feb 18, 2012 10:34am
Exactly!oberhaus;1089421 wrote:That pic is HOT.
Skyhook79
Posts: 5,739
Feb 18, 2012 11:18am
Looks like she has been drugged. Apparently that is a turn on for some.:thumbdown:vball10set;1089415 wrote:^^^more creepy than stupid--she looks like a mannequin
j_crazy
Posts: 8,372
Feb 18, 2012 11:30am
Forget the front cover. Who is that chocolate princess on the back cover?
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Feb 18, 2012 12:34pm
gut;1089394 wrote:Absolutely....But does a 9.9 even make it into my competition for a top-10? No.
Maybe the best way I can explain it is, there are several pictures in this thread where I go "oh, wow, maybe I was wrong....maybe I just haven't seen the right pictures". And every time those have turned out to be pictures of Brooklyn Decker. It's not that Kate isn't phenomenally gorgeous and almost perfect, but she's missing/lacking something. And that's the difference between a top-10 "perfect 10" and hundreds of "almost". Honestly, IMO, what has enabled Kate to rise from that crowd is some great viral marketing and, perhaps, the "girl-next-door" look being the new unique/different after a parade of such truly unique/different beauties in various venues.
To be fair, my perception of Kate could change over the next 4-5 years as her face matures a bit. I think some of my bias can be attributed to her being/looking younger than the age I would consider most women to be their most beautiful (mid-20's, on average, for those that maintain that rockin' 18-yr old figure).
You would get laughed out of a room. The way you're sounding right now is just the worst.
Shit you'd get laughed out of a room full of gay guys sayin that shit.
If there's ever a time for negging this is it
Skyhook79
Posts: 5,739
Feb 18, 2012 1:21pm
He cannot dispute that since you would absolutely know what it takes to do that.SportsAndLady;1089522 wrote:You would get laughed out of a room. The way you're sounding right now is just the worst.
Shit you'd get laughed out of a room full of gay guys sayin that shit.
If there's ever a time for negging this is it