Yeah, that's the way I saw it too. I think Michigan led for awhile, but he really seemed to like his first USC trip, then going back with mom sealed it.karen lotz;1171805 wrote:Yes, I do know his top two was Southern Cal and Michigan. Everything I had seen indicated he has been pretty much all SC for a while now and it was all but a done deal after he visited with his mom.
Honestly, how could it not. Typical big college town vs. LA.WebFire;1171911 wrote:Yeah, that's the way I saw it too. I think Michigan led for awhile, but he really seemed to like his first USC trip, then going back with mom sealed it.
Hot girls in bikinis, celebrities, night life, free housing and cars. Hard not to like that.bigkahuna;1172778 wrote:Honestly, how could it not. Typical big college town vs. LA.
Had an offer but couldn't get in, huh?OneBuckeye;1188197 wrote:From what i've read Hurst tried to get in at OSU but was turned away, just another kid Hoke could sell the OSU hate pitch to.
supposidly there are offers then there are OFFERS. OFFERS are commitable at anytime offers are contingent on something. Who knows. Difference between Tressel and Urban. I'm sure it has happend at UM over time as well. They offer multiple kids at a position and if they feel they are sitting well with someone they have higher on the board and only have room for 1 guy they tell the guy that is 3rd on their board to wait a little bit. That is what Urban did here.WebFire;1188200 wrote:Had an offer but couldn't get in, huh?
WebFire;1191157 wrote:SMH at #21 being long snapper Scott Sypniewski. I made fun of ND for it, and I'll make fun of Michigan for it. I do not like this commitment in this class at all.
WebFire;1191157 wrote:SMH at #21 being long snapper Scott Sypniewski. I made fun of ND for it, and I'll make fun of Michigan for it. I do not like this commitment in this class at all.
LS has never been a concern. Long snapper is a position I just don't think you offer a scholly to. Especially when you still have highly rated prospects on the board and only a few spots left to give. And it's only June. If this were in February and we had one to give away, that would be different.karen lotz;1191362 wrote:If the kid is good, there is no concern over long snapping for 4 years. Should all specialists be walk ons??
We gave 2 placekickers and a punter a scholly over the last few years (highly rated ones too), and there are definitely concerns over those.karen lotz;1191362 wrote:If the kid is good, there is no concern over long snapping for 4 years. Should all specialists be walk ons??
13bigkahuna;1232434 wrote:Is he part of the 2012 or 2013 class?
