data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fce2/4fce2139bf727aa983b740ddea07cef4b0d1f8a1" alt="cruiser_96's avatar"
cruiser_96
Posts: 7,536
Feb 16, 2012 8:59am
160: 7 wrestlers...
Alex Mickley | ||
145 | ||
Cody Allen | ||
BYE | ||
146 | ||
Cody Barney | ||
Alex Gamble | ||
147 | ||
Chris Horsley | ||
Nate Good | ||
148 | ||
Kyle Harness |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/86cbd/86cbd4fe3241599dec010514fdd350631ab3ef41" alt="Westie101's avatar"
Westie101
Posts: 847
Feb 16, 2012 9:00am
thanks underrated, and thanks cruiser. looks like its going to be a short day.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/96887/968877a2865988f23e527bbb3d735e6a6ab27502" alt="zambrown's avatar"
zambrown
Posts: 1,093
Feb 16, 2012 9:34am
Thanks, Cruiser!
P
pantherdad2312
Posts: 39
Feb 16, 2012 10:34am
Interesting to see that Cbus 182 City Champ Stockton moved up to 195 for sectionals. The Stockton-Juty match should it happen pitting City Champ vs. City Champ possibly in semi's would be fun one to watch.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/86cbd/86cbd4fe3241599dec010514fdd350631ab3ef41" alt="Westie101's avatar"
Westie101
Posts: 847
Feb 16, 2012 10:53am
Pantherdad, Stockton has bumped up to wrestle Juty 3 times over the last two seasons and it has always been a close and exciting match. Juty leads the series 2-1.
P
pantherdad2312
Posts: 39
Feb 16, 2012 11:24am
Westie, love to see when kids bump to get best match possible instead of protecting a record, only makes them better and prepares them for times like now. I noticed they gave Stockton a (5) but didn't see a(3) listed. Was this a typo or ?Westie101;1087577 wrote:Pantherdad, Stockton has bumped up to wrestle Juty 3 times over the last two seasons and it has always been a close and exciting match. Juty leads the series 2-1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/86cbd/86cbd4fe3241599dec010514fdd350631ab3ef41" alt="Westie101's avatar"
Westie101
Posts: 847
Feb 16, 2012 11:26am
I'm assuming it was. There are a few seed typo's through it looks like.
P
pantherdad2312
Posts: 39
Feb 16, 2012 11:37am
That makes it a bit better then. I was thinking to have a 32-4 record and only getting a (5) seed the waters were pretty rough.
S
slow-n-steady
Posts: 33
Feb 16, 2012 11:45am
a 32-4 record means really nothing in comparison to kids from marysville and davidson kids w 8 to 10 losses. You HAVE to consider schedule. We have seen many kids w great records lose to kids w records that are much worse. Strength of sched matters very much and the coaches understand that.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/86cbd/86cbd4fe3241599dec010514fdd350631ab3ef41" alt="Westie101's avatar"
Westie101
Posts: 847
Feb 16, 2012 11:50am
A very good point slow and steady. To city league coaches credit, it's not like they are getting accepted into Medina and North Canton and most coaches try their best to put together a solid schedule. Although I will say that Stockton has earned his 32-4 record, been wrestling very well this year.slow-n-steady;1087672 wrote:a 32-4 record means really nothing in comparison to kids from marysville and davidson kids w 8 to 10 losses. You HAVE to consider schedule. We have seen many kids w great records lose to kids w records that are much worse. Strength of sched matters very much and the coaches understand that.
P
pantherdad2312
Posts: 39
Feb 16, 2012 12:23pm
I agree slow-n-steady though the kids can only wrestle who is in front of them and Stockton obviously tries to get the best competition he can. Personally I could see my son mature on the mat and was more proud of him in his losses at Medina than many of his wins.slow-n-steady;1087672 wrote:a 32-4 record means really nothing in comparison to kids from marysville and davidson kids w 8 to 10 losses. You HAVE to consider schedule. We have seen many kids w great records lose to kids w records that are much worse. Strength of sched matters very much and the coaches understand that.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e7513/e7513b7db12829cf8554c7b8c2be61a5482afee6" alt="nykc's avatar"
nykc
Posts: 276
Feb 16, 2012 1:38pm
Zeller (120) is the number 3 seed? Ackley (TW) beat him 5-2 at the Cardinal Classic and why is his name not listed at 120? He's not injured
U
Underrated
Posts: 156
Feb 16, 2012 1:47pm
I fixed the omission. Sorry about that. Yes Zeller is the 3 seed. I believe you have to have a winning record to get seeded regardless of head to head.nykc;1087799 wrote:Zeller (120) is the number 3 seed? Ackley (TW) beat him 5-2 at the Cardinal Classic and why is his name not listed at 120? He's not injured
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e7513/e7513b7db12829cf8554c7b8c2be61a5482afee6" alt="nykc's avatar"
nykc
Posts: 276
Feb 16, 2012 1:51pm
Okay thanks you scared the hell outta me. And makes sense, he is 13-14 he'll be tough there.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/86cbd/86cbd4fe3241599dec010514fdd350631ab3ef41" alt="Westie101's avatar"
Westie101
Posts: 847
Feb 16, 2012 2:29pm
So Ackley beat Zeller and Gasca beat Ackley. Should be a very competitive bracket.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e7513/e7513b7db12829cf8554c7b8c2be61a5482afee6" alt="nykc's avatar"
nykc
Posts: 276
Feb 16, 2012 2:46pm
Yeah, Ackley actually wants a rematch with Gasca. I think 120 could be interesting here. Ackley also beat Tate from Davidson who apaprently didn't make sectionals for whatever reason in the finals at the Cardinal Classic. 11 - 2.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/86cbd/86cbd4fe3241599dec010514fdd350631ab3ef41" alt="Westie101's avatar"
Westie101
Posts: 847
Feb 16, 2012 3:02pm
Ackley has some length to him for a 20 pounder, I have no idea how this bracket is going to workout.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f4b1b/f4b1be1e18b849be23d56a45bdba9db783d1ee38" alt="USMCdevil2005's avatar"
USMCdevil2005
Posts: 950
Feb 16, 2012 3:09pm
Just some food for thought here.
My Predictions
106
1. Rahmani M
2. Riley MV
3. Gill HD
4. Transue DJ
113
1. Sparks M
2. Davis HD
3. Bloss FH
4. Johnson
120
1. Kakos FH
2. Sepeda M
3. Zeller MV
4. Jacobs DJ
126
1. Wilson HD
2. McCurdy DH
3. Messeral TW
4. Comfort DJ
132
1. Lawler HD
2. Garza M
3. Hauger MV
4. Justus FH
138
1. Forrider M
2. Alexander N
3. Harmon MV
4. Pearson DJ
145
1. Tate HD
2. Boyd M
3. Horner MV
4. Austin DJ
152
1. DeLande HD
2. Miller M
3. Staten MV
4. Ferias W
160
1. Mickley HD
2. Gamble
3. Harness
4. Barney
170
1. Kuszmaul HD
2. Sierawski DH
3. Roberts M
4. Daniels MV
182
1. Pfarr M
2. Lybarger MV
3. Shackelford TW
4. Wooten DH
195
1. Taylor M
2. Juty B
3. Stockton W
4. Johnson DH
220
1. Backensoe HD
2. Mowery DJ
3. Rine M
4. Craddock W
HVY
1. Thirkield M
2. Christner DH
3. Gilmore TW
4. Gray W
Team
1. Marysville - With 6 Champs and a total of 12 qualifiers, I think it should be enough to take the team title.
2. Hilliard Davidson- With 7 Champs you would think it should be enough to take a team title, but in this case I think only qualifying 9 total will hurt them. Coach D, you need a hvy weigh. With the younger TAte out it hurts as well.
3. Mount Vernon - I think they're third here but no where near the top 2.
My Predictions
106
1. Rahmani M
2. Riley MV
3. Gill HD
4. Transue DJ
113
1. Sparks M
2. Davis HD
3. Bloss FH
4. Johnson
120
1. Kakos FH
2. Sepeda M
3. Zeller MV
4. Jacobs DJ
126
1. Wilson HD
2. McCurdy DH
3. Messeral TW
4. Comfort DJ
132
1. Lawler HD
2. Garza M
3. Hauger MV
4. Justus FH
138
1. Forrider M
2. Alexander N
3. Harmon MV
4. Pearson DJ
145
1. Tate HD
2. Boyd M
3. Horner MV
4. Austin DJ
152
1. DeLande HD
2. Miller M
3. Staten MV
4. Ferias W
160
1. Mickley HD
2. Gamble
3. Harness
4. Barney
170
1. Kuszmaul HD
2. Sierawski DH
3. Roberts M
4. Daniels MV
182
1. Pfarr M
2. Lybarger MV
3. Shackelford TW
4. Wooten DH
195
1. Taylor M
2. Juty B
3. Stockton W
4. Johnson DH
220
1. Backensoe HD
2. Mowery DJ
3. Rine M
4. Craddock W
HVY
1. Thirkield M
2. Christner DH
3. Gilmore TW
4. Gray W
Team
1. Marysville - With 6 Champs and a total of 12 qualifiers, I think it should be enough to take the team title.
2. Hilliard Davidson- With 7 Champs you would think it should be enough to take a team title, but in this case I think only qualifying 9 total will hurt them. Coach D, you need a hvy weigh. With the younger TAte out it hurts as well.
3. Mount Vernon - I think they're third here but no where near the top 2.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e7513/e7513b7db12829cf8554c7b8c2be61a5482afee6" alt="nykc's avatar"
nykc
Posts: 276
Feb 16, 2012 3:34pm
Ackley is a scrapper, don't let his record fool you. He has only wrestled for 3 years and had some bad draws in his tournaments this year. He was a district alternate when he was a freshmen, last year he was eliminated by Suhr - he caught Suhr but couldn't pin him before time expired. Depending on how he is set up in the brackets I am sure he will be a tough match for most of the kids in his class and wouldn't be suprised if he places.
Okay now that we know what's what...
My food for thought:
106
1. Rahmini (MA)
2. Riley (MV)
3. Transue (DJ)
4. Gill (HD)
113
1. Davis (HD)
2. Sparks (MA)
3. Bloss (FH)
4. Johnson (WE)
120
1. Kakos (FH)
2. Sepeda (MA)
3. Ackley (TW)
4. Gasca (WE)
126
1. Wilson (HD)
2. McCurdy (DH)
3. Comfort (DJ)
4. Messerall (TW)
132
1. Garza (MA)
2. Hauger (MV)
3. Lawler (HD)
4. Justus (FH)
138
1. Alexander (NL)
2. Forrider (MA)
3. Harmon (MV)
4. Pearson (DJ)
145
1. Tate (HD)
2. Boyd (MA)
3. Austin (DJ)
4. Horner (MV)
152
1. Delande (HD)
2. Miller (MA)
3. Farias (WE)
4. Staten (MV)
160
1. Mickley
2. Gamble
3. Harness
4. Barney
170
1. Kuszmaul HD
2. Quinonez (WE)
3. Sierawski (DH)
4. Daniels (MV)
182
1. Shackleford
2. Lybarger
3. Pfarr
4. Wooten
195
1. Juty
2. Stockton
3. Taylor
4. King
220
1. Mowery
2. Morro
3. Rine
4. Backenstoe
285
1. Thirkield
2. Christner
3. Gray
4. Gilmore
Okay now that we know what's what...
My food for thought:
106
1. Rahmini (MA)
2. Riley (MV)
3. Transue (DJ)
4. Gill (HD)
113
1. Davis (HD)
2. Sparks (MA)
3. Bloss (FH)
4. Johnson (WE)
120
1. Kakos (FH)
2. Sepeda (MA)
3. Ackley (TW)
4. Gasca (WE)
126
1. Wilson (HD)
2. McCurdy (DH)
3. Comfort (DJ)
4. Messerall (TW)
132
1. Garza (MA)
2. Hauger (MV)
3. Lawler (HD)
4. Justus (FH)
138
1. Alexander (NL)
2. Forrider (MA)
3. Harmon (MV)
4. Pearson (DJ)
145
1. Tate (HD)
2. Boyd (MA)
3. Austin (DJ)
4. Horner (MV)
152
1. Delande (HD)
2. Miller (MA)
3. Farias (WE)
4. Staten (MV)
160
1. Mickley
2. Gamble
3. Harness
4. Barney
170
1. Kuszmaul HD
2. Quinonez (WE)
3. Sierawski (DH)
4. Daniels (MV)
182
1. Shackleford
2. Lybarger
3. Pfarr
4. Wooten
195
1. Juty
2. Stockton
3. Taylor
4. King
220
1. Mowery
2. Morro
3. Rine
4. Backenstoe
285
1. Thirkield
2. Christner
3. Gray
4. Gilmore
A
asianwestie1
Posts: 27
Feb 16, 2012 6:26pm
113 & 126 predictions how will they turn out? 113 Sparks is a stud. How will comfort and messerral do for 3rd and 4th or will it even be them lots of exitment but short tourney.182 stockton and juty great dudes solid too.
L
lennyrox55
Posts: 140
Feb 16, 2012 6:40pm
Alexander over Forrider, no chance.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f4b1b/f4b1be1e18b849be23d56a45bdba9db783d1ee38" alt="USMCdevil2005's avatar"
USMCdevil2005
Posts: 950
Feb 16, 2012 7:16pm
Wow, Davis over sparks and Alexander over Forrider? I would say there is a possibility for davis but no way Alexander beats Forrider lol .
I like your dream though.
I like your dream though.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f4b1b/f4b1be1e18b849be23d56a45bdba9db783d1ee38" alt="USMCdevil2005's avatar"
USMCdevil2005
Posts: 950
Feb 16, 2012 7:16pm
Wow, Davis over sparks and Alexander over Forrider? I would say there is a possibility for davis but no way Alexander beats Forrider lol .
I like your dream though.
I like your dream though.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e7513/e7513b7db12829cf8554c7b8c2be61a5482afee6" alt="nykc's avatar"
nykc
Posts: 276
Feb 16, 2012 8:09pm
Alexander / Forrider will be a good one, not to much is known about Alexander, coming from a city league I also believe he is overlooked. He is my upset pick, although I could be wrong. Will be a good finals.
As far as Davis and Sparks - Davis is a tough kid, I actually think Bloss has a shot at taking Davis out but I think there will be some upsets with Davis being one of them.
As far as Davis and Sparks - Davis is a tough kid, I actually think Bloss has a shot at taking Davis out but I think there will be some upsets with Davis being one of them.
D
Dad4Sports
Posts: 1,779
Feb 16, 2012 8:13pm
But Alexander was at Coffman last year....don't think he will sneak up on anyone.nykc;1088217 wrote:Alexander / Forrider will be a good one, not to much is known about Alexander, coming from a city league I also believe he is overlooked. He is my upset pick, although I could be wrong. Will be a good finals.
As far as Davis and Sparks - Davis is a tough kid, I actually think Bloss has a shot at taking Davis out but I think there will be some upsets with Davis being one of them.