I'm finally going to see it today.

I enjoyed it. I thought it was kind of slow at times but nothing too bad. Liam is a bad ass.

bigdaddy2003;1071648 wrote:I enjoyed it. I thought it was kind of slow at times but nothing too bad. Liam is a bad ass.

Yeah, I think from the previews you expected a faster pace. But once I realized that wasnt going to be the case, I was able to really enjoy the dialogue and character building.

Y-Town Steelhound;1065228 wrote:Well in terms of slow-moving Liam Neeson movies, Schindler's List wasn't exactly jump out of your seat action. Doesn't mean it wasn't a good movie.

Which was a surprise because Schindler's List was billed as an action film. :rolleyes:

dwccrew;1071803 wrote:Which was a surprise because Schindler's List was billed as an action film. :rolleyes:

Boo.

Finally got around to seeing it.

Very good movie. I'd give it a B or B+.

Very tense and suspenseful, and I liked that. I also liked the feeling of isolation, depression, and sense of survival that the characters went through.

I would have liked more from the ending, though it did tie a lot of things together with his wife and whatnot as the flashbacks played. The scene after the credits was very brief, but gave some sort of closure, I suppose.

Also, martyirish, STFU.


[h=1]Wolves kill teacher in Alaska[/h] http://articles.latimes.com/2010/mar/13/nation/la-na-wolf-attack13-2010mar13

The movie is plausible, as has been stated. If you're worried about a movie being 100% realistic, why even fucking bother?

I can't believe it didn't do better at the box office. I thought they did a great job of advertising it. I'm not a fan of the survival stuff but I gave it a shot, and other than the ending I really didn't think it was too bad at all. It's no Taken, but its safe to give it a shot.

^ I only ever saw one trailer for it, and no commercials.