ichsnjb;1091342 wrote:Someone would really do that? That's a shame. I haven't heard or seen much here, but it sounds like he's the most hated person here?!

vball10set;1091345 wrote:lol, look who's here :rolleyes:

ichsnjb;1091348 wrote:What's your problem? Didn't do nothin to you.

vball10set;1090553 wrote:I'm not a big proponent of banning on a message board, but his was warranted without question....now, we gotta' get rid of that gym teacher

Skyhook79;1097326 wrote:Yeah it was really warranted, he made up 4 rule violations to ban me, good for him.

Cue the typical responses from the same characters.

Skyhook79;1097326 wrote:QQ!

Originally Posted by kobeismvp
You mean like, how you were allowed to get away with at the "other" site??? aka your attacks on skyhook79???

Skyhook79;1097326 wrote:Yeah it was really warranted, he made up 4 rule violations to ban me, good for him.

Cue the typical responses from the same characters.

ytownfootball;1097339 wrote:Or possibly this? QQing on two sites qualifies you as such a hatchet wound.

Skyhook79;1097326 wrote:Yeah it was really warranted, he made up 4 rule violations to ban me, good for him.

Cue the typical responses from the same characters.

wes_mantooth;1098186 wrote:This is a complete lie....I banned you, then I infracted you afterwards...just to be a dick.

wes_mantooth;1098186 wrote:This is a complete lie....I banned you, then I infracted you afterwards...just to be a dick.

wes_mantooth;1098186 wrote:This is a complete lie....I banned you, then I infracted you afterwards...just to be a dick.

wes_mantooth;1098272 wrote:hahaha...nah, I am just clowning as always.

Skyhook79;1087475 wrote:Apparently you are not allowed to mention anything relating to a teams attendance along with no personal attacks or name calling, unless it's Browns fans talking about Bengals attendance of course, or hypocritecats20 will give you an infraction. Even though the rules do not say that.

Skyhook79;1088141 wrote:What rule did I break?

Skyhook79;1088161 wrote:It fits because he can't give me a rule I broke.

Skyhook79;1088169 wrote:"Good to see the Cavs get a good win even though the 12000 fans there probally were hoping for a loss like "some" of the posters here."

How is that trolling? It was in a Cavs season thread, I commented on their good win, I stated the approximate attendance for the game, and commented on several Cavs fans who have said multiple times they were hoping for them to lose to better their draft status.

Skyhook79;1088176 wrote:Why don't you follow the rules or leave? I thought that was why the rules are posted or do you make them up as you go?
It's mods like you that are slowly turning this site into JJHuddle 2.0.

Skyhook79;1088179 wrote:I wasn't allowed to because of hypocritecats20.

Skyhook79;1088182 wrote:Exactly, that stuff happens a lot on here. Someone makes a statement and then when they are called on it they complain to the mods and then next thing you know you can't talk about Cavs attendance anymore.

Skyhook79;1088186 wrote:Impersonating a mod.

Skyhook79;1088609 wrote:Not much to know except hypocritecats20 doesn't allow Cavs attendance numbers to be discussed in a Cavs season thread.

Skyhook79;1088674 wrote:When you sign up for the OC you agree to abide by the forum rules not made up ones by hypocritecats20.

Skyhook79;1088691 wrote:I don't see it that way. If you didn't break any rules and you were not permitted to post rebuttals to what other posters have claimed you would think different.

Skyhook79;1088693 wrote:cry is already taken. Like_that has a whole encyclopedia of names for me and others because he has nothing better to do.

Skyhook79;1088728 wrote:I hope hypocritecats20 doesn't see this.

Skyhook79;1088739 wrote:Just because you don't care about it doesn't mean I can't care about it. I am sure there are things you care about that I don't.

Skyhook79;1088788 wrote:Must be why I can't post on the Cavs season thread anymore. Personal attack by hypocritecats20, not surprised.

Did you warn the posters who posted on the Bengals or Piston's poor attendance?

Skyhook79;1088801 wrote:Exactly... hypocritecats20.

Skyhook79;1088877 wrote:Of course you do.

Skyhook79;1088878 wrote:Unless you also banned from NBA random Chatter thread then I would agree.

Skyhook79;1088882 wrote:So you agree that I was given more than just a warning. Thanks hypocritecats20.

Skyhook79;1088927 wrote:Yes it's not.

Skyhook79;1097326 wrote:Yeah it was really warranted, he made up 4 rule violations to ban me, good for him.

Cue the typical responses from the same characters.

DeyDurkie5;1100593 wrote:

LJ;1100599 wrote:glorious

DeyDurkie5;1100593 wrote: