Rotinaj
Posts: 7,699
Jan 7, 2012 8:31am
Only in the B1G.
D
dave
Posts: 4,558
Jan 7, 2012 10:13am
WR was the worst position he recruited. It will easily be their biggest weakness next year.bo shemmy3337;1041498 wrote:At least he did not play this season like he would have at OSU like Posey. He needs cut and the WR's will be fine without him IMO. If there is one thing that RR did do good it was get some good WR's
B
bigkahuna
Posts: 4,454
Jan 7, 2012 11:12am
This was a dynamite drop in. Maybe we should make a thread about everyone who posts "we" when referring to their favorite sports teams.said_aouita;1041695 wrote:I didn't know an OC'er plays football for UofM! Nice.
W
WebFire
Posts: 14,779
Jan 7, 2012 11:25am
I didn't see where anyone said they did.said_aouita;1041695 wrote:I didn't know an OC'er plays football for UofM! Nice.
B
bigkahuna
Posts: 4,454
Jan 8, 2012 7:48pm
I think I am going to miss Stonum though. I mean we'll have some receivers, but not a lot of experience. Roundtree is a Senior next year isn't he? We'll have him, Gallon and Dileo. Not great, but not nothing either. I don't know/can't think of anyone else.
W
WebFire
Posts: 14,779
Jan 8, 2012 8:27pm
I like Gallon and Dileo, but they are far from big time receivers.
Hb31187
Posts: 8,534
Jan 8, 2012 8:37pm
These type of comments never fail to be not funnysaid_aouita;1041695 wrote:I didn't know an OC'er plays football for UofM! Nice.
B
bigkahuna
Posts: 4,454
Jan 9, 2012 8:22pm
That's where I think Stonum will be missed. Not exactly a big time receiver, but he's closer. Roundtree does still have 1 more year though correct?WebFire;1044186 wrote:I like Gallon and Dileo, but they are far from big time receivers.
W
WebFire
Posts: 14,779
Jan 9, 2012 8:31pm
Correct.bigkahuna;1045537 wrote:That's where I think Stonum will be missed. Not exactly a big time receiver, but he's closer. Roundtree does still have 1 more year though correct?
said_aouita
Posts: 8,532
Jan 9, 2012 8:49pm
What's not more funny, the people who use "we" when talking about a college football team or the people who make fun of them?Hb31187;1044236 wrote:These type of comments never fail to be not funny
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Jan 9, 2012 8:51pm
said_aouita;1045628 wrote:What's not more funny, the people who use "we" when talking about a college football team or the people who make fun of them?
I vote C, cross country runners
B
bo shemmy3337
Posts: 962
Jan 13, 2012 12:14am
I don't see it. the guys that have been on the field for 3 years are just now leaving. the other kids have never even had a shot at the field. They will be just fine IMO. The o line a D line are the ones who will be lacking.dave;1041789 wrote:WR was the worst position he recruited. It will easily be their biggest weakness next year.
W
WebFire
Posts: 14,779
Jan 13, 2012 9:35am
If we can get a frosh to come in and make an immediate impact, D line will be ok. Not great, and certainly no depth. OL will have not depth and need a center to step up.bo shemmy3337;1050450 wrote:I don't see it. the guys that have been on the field for 3 years are just now leaving. the other kids have never even had a shot at the field. They will be just fine IMO. The o line a D line are the ones who will be lacking.
WR could be almost bad. Roundtree and Gallon are what we have coming back, and maybe Stonum. Our receivers in 2011 were very average. We need some playmakers at the position badly, and we won't have them next year.
B
bo shemmy3337
Posts: 962
Jan 13, 2012 12:10pm
WebFire;1050667 wrote:If we can get a frosh to come in and make an immediate impact, D line will be ok. Not great, and certainly no depth. OL will have not depth and need a center to step up.
WR could be almost bad. Roundtree and Gallon are what we have coming back, and maybe Stonum. Our receivers in 2011 were very average. We need some playmakers at the position badly, and we won't have them next year.
What I am saying is the guys who are leaving were starters for 3 years, the other guys never had a shot at the field. Now is there chance and i think they will be fine but that is just me.
stroups
Posts: 3,223
Jan 17, 2012 4:08pm
Looks like he finally got the boot today
Midstate01
Posts: 14,766
Jan 17, 2012 4:26pm
stroups;1055990 wrote:Looks like he finally got the boot today
Hoke should be criticized for just trying to free up another schollie!!!
jk
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Jan 17, 2012 4:29pm
Interesting timing with Michigan coaches set to visit Jordan Payton Thursday.
W
WebFire
Posts: 14,779
Jan 17, 2012 4:54pm
Hoke already said they are pursuing 3 WRs now instead of 2, whether Payton commits or not. I think that was writing on the wall.karen lotz;1056032 wrote:Interesting timing with Michigan coaches set to visit Jordan Payton Thursday.
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Jan 17, 2012 5:04pm
Ha, I know man. Just joking around. Cal's WR coach left for Washington today as well. Can't imagine Payton sticking and wouldn't be surprised to see Treggs move on either. Cal was on top of the recruiting world at the Army game and its now all crashing down on them.
D
dave
Posts: 4,558
Jan 17, 2012 6:18pm
Glad Hoke did this even when it is a killer blow to the team. Stonum could have done some big things next year.