BR1986FB;1155796 wrote:They have to have something in mind at WR.

DeyDurkie5;1155801 wrote:DT depth. Pretty sure they like the WR's we have on the roster. Random, but not as bad as people are making it out to be. If one of those two get injured, we are cooked

Midstate01;1155802 wrote:What picks to we have left after the trades?

wes_mantooth;1155789 wrote:Woot...John Hughes....love his movies

87. John Hughes, DT, Cincinnati: Matt Millen Lonely Night Kielbasa Porn Grade
I mocked John Hughes in the seventh round. He wasn't above No. 249 on any major big board. He doesn't even fill a need. This is a terrible selection.

Pick6;1155805 wrote:Could have picked any other position than one we already have taken care of though!

Sonofanump;1155800 wrote:I thought that was his mom?

Pick6;1155822 wrote:Hilton to the Colts.

wes_mantooth;1155823 wrote:is he a TE?

Mulva;1155825 wrote:Mitch Schwartz ‏ @M_Schwartz72

Excited to be a Brown! It's a great organization and I'm looking forward to helping the #Browns win a Super Bowl!

wes_mantooth;1155828 wrote:He must plan on playing for about 40 years....Nice

He has the size to compete inside at the next level, but he lacks athletic ability and has been rather unproductive to this point in his career. He could get selected in a later round by a team that falls in love with him, but he is more likely to get a shot as a free agent.

Hughes has numerous issues in his play that, if not fixed early, could severely limit his NFL prospects. He seems lazy at times and rarely chases plays down on the perimeter. As a run defender, he is capable of getting through blocks but often looks shell-shocked once he gets in the backfield. He needs to finish with more force; at times Hughes would be neutralized by offensive linemen because of his poor effort and pad placement.

lhslep134;1155813 wrote:Let's get Juron Criner.

Mulva;1155830 wrote:

John Huges ladies and gents. Not a reach though. Browns probably had good info that someone else was about to take him. Word is Tampa was interested.