Commander of Awesome;1148792 wrote:No, I dont think he's a scheme fit. He really thrives in a zone defense, not a great tackler, older, and costs a lot of money. We play a ton of man coverage here and Samuel doesn't play as well in that fit which is why he's being traded from Philly.
Thank youCommander of Awesome;1148741 wrote:Wright will not be available in the 3rd. That is just ridiculous.
Sigh. I was going to put effort into a response but you simply don't get it.Skyhook79;1148586 wrote:Please list all the WR's from ND who came out in the draft in the last 15 years that amounted to anything in the NFL?
Makes sense, pretty sure Tony Grossi was pre-ripped the Browns last week for not taking him because they didn't take Mathews a couple years ago.BR1986FB;1148831 wrote:Minnifield now to be a possible later round/UDFA pick after micro-fracture surgery?
http://www.draftinsider.net/blog/?p=6265
Grossi's such an idiot. That's failhook logic even I saw it.bases_loaded;1148938 wrote:Makes sense, pretty sure Tony Grossi was pre-ripped the Browns last week for not taking him because they didn't take Mathews a couple years ago.
Commander of Awesome;1148941 wrote:Grossi's such an idiot. That's failhook logic even I saw it.
What I found odd was that I read an interview with Frank Minnifield asking whether he would like his son to play for the Browns. He said something to the effect of "it would be bittersweet. On the one hand, Cleveland is a great place but on the other I have my 'haters/detractors' in Cleveland and I wouldn't want to subject him to that."bases_loaded;1148938 wrote:Makes sense, pretty sure Tony Grossi was pre-ripped the Browns last week for not taking him because they didn't take Mathews a couple years ago.
What kills me is that about 90% of the guys on the OBR think he's a "kinder, gentler Tony Grossi" since he went to KNR. When I read his stuff he still comes off as a condescending prick to me.wes_mantooth;1148947 wrote:I like that he is touted as an insider....like anyone in the browns organization would have anything to do with him after that twitter fiasco.
I agree third round is a stretch, but he may very well be available at 37. Sorry just posting what I read. Here's the post below:Commander of Awesome;1148741 wrote:Wright will not be available in the 3rd. That is just ridiculous.
shook_17;1149030 wrote:^^ see that shit pisses me off. how is it right after the season he is highly touted wide out this year. and now all of a sudden he is "parked in the third round" watch the film, it doesnt lie. the dude can play.
shook_17;1149030 wrote:^^ see that shit pisses me off. how is it right after the season he is highly touted wide out this year. and now all of a sudden he is "parked in the third round" watch the film, it doesnt lie. the dude can play.
lhslep134;1148896 wrote:Sigh. I was going to put effort into a response but you simply don't get it.
I would love to see someone that went in-depth about how mock drafts looked right after the season, to the actual draft and late mock drafts, and see which is more accurate on projecting players. So many guys either move up because of great combines or move down due to bad performances, so it would be interesting to me to see if most of the effects of the combine/tryouts were actually accurate in evaluating the players.shook_17;1149030 wrote:^^ see that **** pisses me off. how is it right after the season he is highly touted wide out this year. and now all of a sudden he is "parked in the third round" watch the film, it doesnt lie. the dude can play.
Minny and Top Dog were quite a pair. Browns were great entertainment during that era. Oz, Mack, Byner and Bernie...with weapons like Langhorn, Brennan, Webster and the ice cube. Great football team that fell a little short 3 years.BR1986FB;1148950 wrote:What I found odd was that I read an interview with Frank Minnifield asking whether he would like his son to play for the Browns. He said something to the effect of "it would be bittersweet. On the one hand, Cleveland is a great place but on the other I have my 'haters/detractors' in Cleveland and I wouldn't want to subject him to that."
Now my question is...doesn't anyone know a person who hates Mighty Minni? I don't.
That's funny because I'm starting to change my tune on wanting Richardson at 4 as we get closer to the draft. After what the Browns did to Mendenhall last year I'm a bit iffy on using a #4 pick on a guy that you may get 4-5 solid years out of. This being said, it leaves me in a quandry because I wouldn't know what to do. Pretty much leaves Claiborne but I'm still hoping for a trade down.Footwedge;1149155 wrote:I've changed my mind...take Richardson at 4. He's the next Ray Rice only stronger and a little faster. Then....please....try to get a wide receiver....and another sleeper wide receiver in the later rounds.
No doubt, but you have to draft needs and there isn't a superbowl leading qb available unless Indy trades the 1st pick.Pick6;1149277 wrote:I remember a point was brought up way back in this thread...when is the last time a top pick running back led his team to a super bowl??
Just something to think about.
