Ohio Chatter
Ohio Chatter

Forums

All Threads Serious Business Sports Politics Archive Pick 'ems Wordio
Log In Create Account

2012 Cleveland Browns thread: AKA Pat Shurmur Memorial thread

Home ▸ Archive ▸ Pro Sports ▸ 2012 Cleveland Browns thread: AKA Pat Shurmur Memorial thread
B

BR1986FB

Senior Member

24,104 posts
Apr 17, 2012 9:05 PM
DeyDurkie5;1146346 wrote: The steak dinner will be coming this year BR, and I can't wait.
Ahhh to be young & goofy again...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qwq7BYOnDrM
Apr 17, 2012 9:05pm
lhslep134's avatar

lhslep134

why so serious?

9,774 posts
Apr 17, 2012 9:06 PM
Footwedge;1146347 wrote:No...but Auburn is. Excuse me for mistaking his A for Auburn. Given his mathematics skillset, Arizona people would be embarassed as hell.

See my above post about how pathetically embarrassing your math skills are. I'm fairly certain 100% of the people on here will agree with my calculation of the percentile and not your incorrect one.
Apr 17, 2012 9:06pm
derek bomar's avatar

derek bomar

Senior Member

3,722 posts
Apr 17, 2012 9:06 PM
Commander of Awesome;1146018 wrote:More than you pay dynasty moron.
that wasn't predictable at all
Apr 17, 2012 9:06pm
DeyDurkie5's avatar

DeyDurkie5

Senior Member

11,324 posts
Apr 17, 2012 9:07 PM
BR1986FB;1146356 wrote:Ahhh to be young & goofy again...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qwq7BYOnDrM
haha you didn't address the other points I made..
Apr 17, 2012 9:07pm
B

BR1986FB

Senior Member

24,104 posts
Apr 17, 2012 9:07 PM
SportsAndLady;1146312 wrote:BR does your executive recruiting firm have a "no steroids" policy to work there?
Does your work have a "no pussies who get their asses punked at Ohio University for being a mouthy little bitch" policy? :rolleyes:
Apr 17, 2012 9:07pm
F

Footwedge

Senior Member

9,265 posts
Apr 17, 2012 9:08 PM
lhslep134;1146342 wrote:You are so dumb, and this post is wrong. You have to be a dumbass redneck, that's the only explanation for how ignorant you are.


Just in case you feel the need to look even more stupid, your link on that thread was for fantasy rankings, not quality rankings.

http://insider.espn.go.com/mlb/story/_/id/7547690/mlb-top-100-prospects-2012-mike-trout-bryce-harper-more

In that list, Pomeranz is 50th overally and the 25th listed pitcher. Regardless, he's nowhere close to top 10th perctile, whatever incorrect definition you use.


To the rest of the OC, I'm sorry that I had to waste your time schooling this idiot.
Muhahaha. The hole you dig gets deeper and deeper. We are talking pitchers you dumb fuck. Not players. And what's really incredible, you tried to pull that shit last night....and I had to correct you.

When you get a little older, you will understand the life lesson. When you are proven wrong, accept it...learn from it...grow from it...and move on.

Footwedge's life lessons are free...no need to thank me.
Apr 17, 2012 9:08pm
killer_ewok's avatar

killer_ewok

iRep

11,379 posts
Apr 17, 2012 9:08 PM
DeyDurkie5;1146354 wrote:yeah. except we are at page number 245, and the steelers are at 7. How's the syracuse orange, notre dame fighting irish, and steelers doing? Oh wait, you don't care until they are in the playoffs LOL pwnd
What are you talking about? What team don't I care about until they are in the playoffs? LOL. This literally makes no sense. Also, what does what page number a thread is on matter? This sounds as dumb as non's successful team-intelligent fan base correlation. Now please continue being one of the site's biggest hypocrites.
Apr 17, 2012 9:08pm
DeyDurkie5's avatar

DeyDurkie5

Senior Member

11,324 posts
Apr 17, 2012 9:09 PM
get your gay fantasy baseball out of this thread footwedge.
Apr 17, 2012 9:09pm
lhslep134's avatar

lhslep134

why so serious?

9,774 posts
Apr 17, 2012 9:09 PM
okay so COA I did interpret your post correctly, and I actually agree. I got to watch Luck, Osweiler, and Foles all the time this year and Foles looked at least as good as Tannehill and Weeden so I would be all for him after the 3rd round. I don't think there's a QB worth a 1st, 2nd, or 3rd round pick outside of RGIII/Luck either, which I guess is good if the Browns don't botch their other picks because we can attempt to fill the many holes on our team.
Apr 17, 2012 9:09pm
Commander of Awesome's avatar

Commander of Awesome

Senior Pwner

23,151 posts
Apr 17, 2012 9:09 PM
derek bomar;1146363 wrote:that wasn't predictable at all
Took you that long to come up with this fail? I'm not surprised.
Apr 17, 2012 9:09pm
DeyDurkie5's avatar

DeyDurkie5

Senior Member

11,324 posts
Apr 17, 2012 9:09 PM
killer_ewok;1146369 wrote:What are you talking about? What team don't I care about until they are in the playoffs? LOL. This literally makes no sense. Also, what does what page number a thread is on matter? This sounds as dumb as non's successful team-intelligent fan base correlation. Now please continue being one of the site's biggest hypocrites.
LOL exactly! thanks for playing buddy
Apr 17, 2012 9:09pm
SportsAndLady's avatar

SportsAndLady

Senior Member

35,632 posts
Apr 17, 2012 9:10 PM
BR1986FB;1146365 wrote:Does your work have a "no pussies who get their asses punked at Ohio University for being a mouthy little bitch" policy? :rolleyes:
No I don't think so
Apr 17, 2012 9:10pm
B

BR1986FB

Senior Member

24,104 posts
Apr 17, 2012 9:10 PM
DeyDurkie5;1146364 wrote:haha you didn't address the other points I made..
To address your comment about the draft picks, you're expecting a perfect storm which isn't realistic. You are expecting 3+ rookies to come in and make an immediate MAJOR impact (to get them to the playoffs). One possibly, two your lucky but more than that and EVERY card has to fall in place. Highly unlikely. Now with a year or two under their belts I'd be inclined to agree.
Apr 17, 2012 9:10pm
SportsAndLady's avatar

SportsAndLady

Senior Member

35,632 posts
Apr 17, 2012 9:11 PM
BR1986FB;1146365 wrote:Does your work have a "no pussies who get their asses punked at Ohio University for being a mouthy little bitch" policy? :rolleyes:
Does your company like their director to make these types of comments to people?
Apr 17, 2012 9:11pm
DeyDurkie5's avatar

DeyDurkie5

Senior Member

11,324 posts
Apr 17, 2012 9:11 PM
BR1986FB;1146375 wrote:To address your comment about the draft picks, you're expecting a perfect storm which isn't realistic. You are expecting 3+ rookies to come in and make an immediate MAJOR impact (to get them to the playoffs). One possibly, two your lucky but more than that and EVERY card has to fall in place. Highly unlikely. Now with a year or two under their belts I'd be inclined to agree.
Yes, but you are expecting ONE ROOKIE QB to come in and make a difference, which is even more retarded.
Apr 17, 2012 9:11pm
lhslep134's avatar

lhslep134

why so serious?

9,774 posts
Apr 17, 2012 9:12 PM
I'm no longer responding to failwedge. He is legitimately stupid and has no idea what he's talking about, which is fine when talking about opinion but not a universally accepted thing like math. That's just plain ignorance and borderline mental retardation.


It's just not worth the effort needed to sort through the idiocy.
Apr 17, 2012 9:12pm
B

BR1986FB

Senior Member

24,104 posts
Apr 17, 2012 9:12 PM
killer_ewok;1146369 wrote: This sounds as dumb as non's successful team-intelligent fan base correlation.
Oh Hell's yeah!!! Steeler on Steeler violence!!!
Apr 17, 2012 9:12pm
shook_17's avatar

shook_17

Senior Member

3,023 posts
Apr 17, 2012 9:13 PM
DeyDurkie5;1146354 wrote:yeah. except we are at page number 245, and the steelers are at 7. How's the syracuse orange, notre dame fighting irish, and steelers doing? Oh wait, you don't care until they are in the playoffs LOL pwnd
Reps. shut the fuck up bitch.

why isn't anybody talking about the schedule? or maybe i missed it?
Apr 17, 2012 9:13pm
F

Footwedge

Senior Member

9,265 posts
Apr 17, 2012 9:13 PM
lhslep134;1146342 wrote:You are so dumb, and this post is wrong. You have to be a dumbass redneck, that's the only explanation for how ignorant you are.


Just in case you feel the need to look even more stupid, your link on that thread was for fantasy rankings, not quality rankings.

http://insider.espn.go.com/mlb/story/_/id/7547690/mlb-top-100-prospects-2012-mike-trout-bryce-harper-more

In that list, Pomeranz is 50th overally and the 25th listed pitcher. Regardless, he's nowhere close to top 10th perctile, whatever incorrect definition you use.


To the rest of the OC, I'm sorry that I had to waste your time schooling this idiot.

"Listen up kid...percentiles are based on blocks of 100....which I proved in the subsequent post. So I ask you again....what happened to numbers 26 through 100?

Percentiles do not equal percentages...never have...never will. Buy a dictionary and learn".

I'm waiting.......


PS (and the law student claims 6 from the top out of 25 = the 74th percentile) Can't make this stuff up....scroll up and see. LOLOLOL

LSP=severely challenged in math.
Apr 17, 2012 9:13pm
lhslep134's avatar

lhslep134

why so serious?

9,774 posts
Apr 17, 2012 9:14 PM
shook_17;1146383 wrote:
why isn't anybody talking about the schedule? or maybe i missed it?
Not much to mention besides it's hard as f*ck. 3rd hardest by opponents winning percentage from last year.
Apr 17, 2012 9:14pm
killer_ewok's avatar

killer_ewok

iRep

11,379 posts
Apr 17, 2012 9:14 PM
DeyDurkie5;1146373 wrote:LOL exactly! thanks for playing buddy
Yeah, good talk, Durkie. Shame on all 5-10 Steeler fans on this site for not racking up the posts/pages during the offseason. The Steelers pretty much NEVER make a splash in free agency and they're usually drafting late in the 1st round so not as much juicy stuff to post about. Like I said, right up there with non's flawed theory. LOL
Apr 17, 2012 9:14pm
killer_ewok's avatar

killer_ewok

iRep

11,379 posts
Apr 17, 2012 9:16 PM
BR1986FB;1146380 wrote:Oh Hell's yeah!!! Steeler on Steeler violence!!!
LOL. Nothing compared to these exchanges on here though. Cleveland fans are goin' in on each other. Damn.
Apr 17, 2012 9:16pm
SportsAndLady's avatar

SportsAndLady

Senior Member

35,632 posts
Apr 17, 2012 9:16 PM
killer_ewok;1146393 wrote:Nothing compared to these exchanges on here though. Cleveland fans are goin' in on each other. Damn.
It's the offseason, fuck it
Apr 17, 2012 9:16pm
B

BR1986FB

Senior Member

24,104 posts
Apr 17, 2012 9:17 PM
DeyDurkie5;1146377 wrote:Yes, but you are expecting ONE ROOKIE QB to come in and make a difference, which is even more retarded.
Not necessarily. One (current QB) has limited physical limitations while the other doesn't. I'm in the minority but I think Weeden beats McCoy out in a training camp competition.

I'm ALL onboard with Trent Richardson at 4 and will be kinda pissed if they take Claiborne but ya know what? If they stick with McCoy none of that will matter. Logically one would think that T-Rich would open things up for him, correct. It won't. Teams will key even more on the run, crowding the LOS, and then it's ALL on Colt. Beat me if you can/ I don't see it. A QB with at least a threat of a vertical attack, with Richardson, will open things up a ton.
Apr 17, 2012 9:17pm
killer_ewok's avatar

killer_ewok

iRep

11,379 posts
Apr 17, 2012 9:17 PM
SportsAndLady;1146396 wrote:It's the offseason, fuck it
It makes for an entertaining thread. I can't argue with that.
Apr 17, 2012 9:17pm