Ohio Chatter
Ohio Chatter

Forums

All Threads Serious Business Sports Politics Archive Pick 'ems Wordio
Log In Create Account

2012 Cleveland Browns thread: AKA Pat Shurmur Memorial thread

Home ▸ Archive ▸ Pro Sports ▸ 2012 Cleveland Browns thread: AKA Pat Shurmur Memorial thread
Crimson streak's avatar

Crimson streak

Senior Member

9,002 posts
Apr 13, 2012 4:37 PM
The more I think about it I would be willing to take tannehill at 22 and let him sit behind McCoy for next year. But that is the only way I want him.
Apr 13, 2012 4:37pm
Commander of Awesome's avatar

Commander of Awesome

Senior Pwner

23,151 posts
Apr 13, 2012 4:59 PM
Everything I hear makes me think we're seriously considering Weeden at #22. That pisses me off because of his age and he's a big 12 QB. Yet if he's the real deal and we get 6 yrs out of him, that's better than any QB we've had since Bernie.
Apr 13, 2012 4:59pm
SMITTEMS's avatar

SMITTEMS

Senior Member

309 posts
Apr 13, 2012 5:17 PM
Read today where Mike Wallace doesn't have much interest in signing his tender with the Steelers. I believe they will get a third round pick if he leaves as a free agent after the season. If they look to trade him if they don't get a deal done I would not mind giving our #22 pick for him but that's just me
Apr 13, 2012 5:17pm
Crimson streak's avatar

Crimson streak

Senior Member

9,002 posts
Apr 13, 2012 5:20 PM
We would have to give up the 4 th pick for him or else I would be all for it
Apr 13, 2012 5:20pm
Mulva's avatar

Mulva

Senior Member

13,650 posts
Apr 13, 2012 6:58 PM
Commander of Awesome;1143730 wrote:ITs not about sex, its about being 20 yrs old with 3 kids from 3 different women. Shows immaturity, lack of focus, etc... Don't want to draft the next Pacman Jones, Travis Henry, etc, Shawn Kemp, etc...

That article did a terrible job at expaing that.
You wouldn't want to draft Shawn Kemp?
Apr 13, 2012 6:58pm
bases_loaded's avatar

bases_loaded

Senior Member

6,912 posts
Apr 13, 2012 8:05 PM
Crimson streak;1143772 wrote:We would have to give up the 4 th pick for him or else I would be all for it
For the 100th time...thank you for explaining that again. Amazing people are still bringing up the 22nd for Mike Wallace
Apr 13, 2012 8:05pm
Crimson streak's avatar

Crimson streak

Senior Member

9,002 posts
Apr 13, 2012 9:43 PM
I dk why the Bengals don't try and sign him
Apr 13, 2012 9:43pm
F

Footwedge

Senior Member

9,265 posts
Apr 13, 2012 10:54 PM
bases_loaded;1143840 wrote:For the 100th time...thank you for explaining that again. Amazing people are still bringing up the 22nd for Mike Wallace
Mike Wallace is dead.
Apr 13, 2012 10:54pm
Dr. KnOiTaLL's avatar

Dr. KnOiTaLL

Trust me, I'm a doctor!

2,682 posts
Apr 13, 2012 11:12 PM
The Cleveland Plain Dealer reports that the Eagles and Rams are both "believed to be" interested in trading up to the Browns' pick at No. 4 overall.

The Plain Dealer gives the Browns a "decent chance" of trading out of No. 4. "At least three or four" clubs drafting in the top 20 have reportedly phoned Cleveland, with St. Louis and Philadelphia thought to be among them. The Eagles could be targeting Texas A&M QB Ryan Tannehill, while the Rams may be eyeing LSU CB Morris Claiborne, Alabama RB Trent Richardson, or Oklahoma State WR Justin Blackmon. One source told Browns beat reporter Mary Kay Cabot that the Chiefs "would probably not trade up" for Tannehill. It's believed no trade for the No. 4 pick would occur until draft day. Keep in mind the story comes out of Cleveland, and may have been leaked by the Browns to generate interest in the fourth pick.
Apr 13, 2012 11:12pm
Dr. KnOiTaLL's avatar

Dr. KnOiTaLL

Trust me, I'm a doctor!

2,682 posts
Apr 13, 2012 11:40 PM
Taken from: http://espn.go.com/blog/nflnation/post/_/id/56949/report-browns-no-4-pick-drawing-interest

If Holmgren doesn't believe me, he should consult with his good friend and ESPN analyst Jon Gruden before thinking of trading back.

“The easiest thing to do is turn around and hand the ball to somebody 300 times a year,” Gruden said in a conference call. “Everybody says, ‘Don’t take a running back. You can get those guys in the fifth, sixth or seventh round.' You go try to find Trent Richardson in the fifth, sixth or seventh round."

Gruden added, “He’s a beast. He broke all of Emmitt Smith’s high school rushing records in Florida. I’ve seen him run over people, run around people, he protects the ball, he can catch it, can pick up blitzes. He might be the strongest human being on the planet."
Apr 13, 2012 11:40pm
hoops23's avatar

hoops23

Senior Member

15,696 posts
Apr 14, 2012 12:01 AM
I'm agreeing with Jon Gruden.

IMO, the biggest impact player for the Browns is there at #4 and it's Trent... Justin Blackmon will not make the impact Trent will for the Browns.
Apr 14, 2012 12:01am
ytownfootball's avatar

ytownfootball

Bold faced liar...

6,978 posts
Apr 14, 2012 12:05 AM
hoops23;1144060 wrote:I'm agreeing with Jon Gruden.

IMO, the biggest impact player for the Browns is there at #4 and it's Trent... Justin Blackmon will not make the impact Trent will for the Browns.
Ugh, given our lack of movement in other areas this is sadly true I guess.
Apr 14, 2012 12:05am
SMITTEMS's avatar

SMITTEMS

Senior Member

309 posts
Apr 14, 2012 12:36 AM
bases_loaded;1143840 wrote:For the 100th time...thank you for explaining that again. Amazing people are still bringing up the 22nd for Mike Wallace
That's if we SIGN him not if they realize that they (Steelers) can't resign him and end up TRADING him before they are stuck with a 3rd rounder figuring he finishes this coming year first and leaves as a free agent.
Apr 14, 2012 12:36am
SportsAndLady's avatar

SportsAndLady

Senior Member

35,632 posts
Apr 14, 2012 5:56 PM
And this is how it should be. Why would the Browns want the other teams to know what they want/what they're going to do? So every time you see an article that says "the Browns are interested in ____________" it's just talk to get viewers on their site lol


Peter King ‏ @SI_PeterKing
Mock-drafted out. Have talked to 7 highly trustworthy NFL people today. And I can tell you this: No one knows what Cleveland's doing at 4.
Apr 14, 2012 5:56pm
killer_ewok's avatar

killer_ewok

iRep

11,379 posts
Apr 14, 2012 5:58 PM
SMITTEMS;1144069 wrote:That's if we SIGN him not if they realize that they (Steelers) can't resign him and end up TRADING him before they are stuck with a 3rd rounder figuring he finishes this coming year first and leaves as a free agent.

Are you suggesting they'd trade Wallace to another team in the division? No. Fucking. Way.

Anyways, saw this on Twitter and thought it was appropriate to post on here...

"@SI_PeterKing: Mock-drafted out. Have talked to 7 highly trustworthy NFL people today. And I can tell you this: No one knows what Cleveland's doing at 4."
Apr 14, 2012 5:58pm
SportsAndLady's avatar

SportsAndLady

Senior Member

35,632 posts
Apr 14, 2012 6:03 PM
killer_ewok;1144253 wrote:Are you suggesting they'd trade Wallace to another team in the division? No. Fucking. Way.

Anyways, saw this on Twitter and thought it was appropriate to post on here...

"@SI_PeterKing: Mock-drafted out. Have talked to 7 highly trustworthy NFL people today. And I can tell you this: No one knows what Cleveland's doing at 4."
beat you by a few minutes lol
Apr 14, 2012 6:03pm
killer_ewok's avatar

killer_ewok

iRep

11,379 posts
Apr 14, 2012 6:05 PM
SportsAndLady;1144256 wrote:beat you by a few minutes lol

Yeah. LOL
Apr 14, 2012 6:05pm
SportsAndLady's avatar

SportsAndLady

Senior Member

35,632 posts
Apr 14, 2012 6:07 PM
killer_ewok;1144258 wrote:Yeah. LOL
This thread is ridiculously quick haha I'll see a little bit of information and come on here to post it, and it'll be talked about 2 pages back lol
Apr 14, 2012 6:07pm
Skyhook79's avatar

Skyhook79

Senior Member

5,739 posts
Apr 14, 2012 6:09 PM
killer_ewok;1144253 wrote:Are you suggesting they'd trade Wallace to another team in the division? No. Fucking. Way.

Anyways, saw this on Twitter and thought it was appropriate to post on here...

"@SI_PeterKing: Mock-drafted out. Have talked to 7 highly trustworthy NFL people today. And I can tell you this: No one knows what Cleveland's doing at 4."
Including the Browns Front office.
Apr 14, 2012 6:09pm
like_that's avatar

like_that

1st Team All-PWN

26,625 posts
Apr 14, 2012 7:48 PM
SportsAndLady;1144252 wrote:And this is how it should be. Why would the Browns want the other teams to know what they want/what they're going to do? So every time you see an article that says "the Browns are interested in ____________" it's just talk to get viewers on their site lol


Peter King ‏ @SI_PeterKing
Mock-drafted out. Have talked to 7 highly trustworthy NFL people today. And I can tell you this: No one knows what Cleveland's doing at 4.

As much as I hate Peter King, he is more credible than most of the dipshits that I have seen cited on this thread. Anyway, that's what I like to see. Hate being predictable. Now, if only the offense would be as unpredictable...
failhook;1144263 wrote:Including the Browns Front office.
Have you ever contributed to this thread?
Apr 14, 2012 7:48pm
Skyhook79's avatar

Skyhook79

Senior Member

5,739 posts
Apr 14, 2012 8:32 PM
like_that;1144292 wrote:As much as I hate Peter King, he is more credible than most of the dipshits that I have seen cited on this thread. Anyway, that's what I like to see. Hate being predictable. Now, if only the offense would be as unpredictable...



Have you ever contributed to this thread?
Much,much more than you and your usual derogatory comments about people who follow the NFL for a living.
Apr 14, 2012 8:32pm
like_that's avatar

like_that

1st Team All-PWN

26,625 posts
Apr 14, 2012 9:16 PM
Skyhook79;1144333 wrote:Much,much more than you and your usual derogatory comments about people who follow the NFL for a living.
Bleacher report and random bloggers are people who follow the NFL for a living? I simple "no" would have sufficed for your answer as oppose to that fail.
Apr 14, 2012 9:16pm
Mulva's avatar

Mulva

Senior Member

13,650 posts
Apr 14, 2012 11:08 PM
Skyhook79;1144263 wrote:Including the Browns Front office.
I don't think you were really trying to contribute, but I actually completely agree with that.

I highly doubt the Browns FO has made a decision at this point. Even if they've laid out scenarios A, B, and C for who's available I bet the debate is still ongoing for who to take.
Apr 14, 2012 11:08pm