xKoToVxSyNdRoMe
Posts: 1,054
Dec 31, 2011 5:26pm
I don't believe you know what the word "proof" meanspassword;1032040 wrote:This just proves that the Catholic church is ok with gay guys who molest little boys. When a priest molest a little boy, they try and cover it up and hurry up and move the priest to another church so he can continue to rape young boys. This priest in the story is accused of having porn on his computer, images of preteen girls and they want to defrock him. I think he should be charged by the police for his crimes, but my gripe is if it was images of young boys they would not want him defrocked, they would just cover it up, because raping young boys is ok with the church.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/12/30/worcester-diocese-seeks-t_0_n_1176212.html
WORCESTER, Mass. — A Roman Catholic diocese in Massachusetts has asked the Vatican to defrock a priest who is facing charges of possessing child pornography and stealing from his parish.
A spokesman for the Diocese of Worcester (WUH'-stur) tells The Telegram & Gazette () that Bishop Robert McManus has asked the pope to defrock the Rev. Lowe Dongor. http://bit.ly/rqPrfv
Diocese officials say they are seeking to laicize Dongor in the wake of a "clarification" last spring by Vatican officials that child pornography possession is grounds for removal from the priesthood.
Authorities say images of preteen girls were found on Dongor's computer. He also is accused of stealing $40 to $60 from St. Joseph parish in Fitchburg on several occasions. He was released after pleading not guilty and suspended from ministry. It is believed he fled to his native Philippines.
password
Posts: 2,360
Dec 31, 2011 5:31pm
Proof of what?xKoToVxSyNdRoMe;1032607 wrote:I don't believe you know what the word "proof" means
password
Posts: 2,360
Dec 31, 2011 5:35pm
Yes I am.Sonofanump;1032585 wrote:So you are stating when a Catholic Priest molest little boys, he is not removed. Interesting assumption.
He is just transfered to another church to continue his ways. History shows that the Catholic church has covered up the molesting of little boys for many years, that is fact.
Dr Winston O'Boogie
Posts: 1,799
Dec 31, 2011 6:21pm
The Catholic Church suffered in the public's eye because of widespread cover up of molesters. That is so horrible, it's almost beyond comprehension. That said, presently the church has shown itself to be extremely quick about not tolerating anyone who is accused of a crime against a child. The damage to the reputation of the church may never be overcome. The actual instances of pedophilia among Catholic priests is the same as the male population at large, a point that is often overlooked.
The Church bothers me in a lot of ways, but seeing how they now handle cases of alleged crimes against children isn't one after the changes they've made.
The Church bothers me in a lot of ways, but seeing how they now handle cases of alleged crimes against children isn't one after the changes they've made.
S
Sonofanump
Dec 31, 2011 6:46pm
This quote shows different:password;1032616 wrote:Yes I am.
He is just transfered to another church to continue his ways. History shows that the Catholic church has covered up the molesting of little boys for many years, that is fact.
password;1032040 wrote:Diocese officials say they are seeking to laicize Dongor in the wake of a "clarification" last spring by Vatican officials that child pornography possession is grounds for removal from the priesthood.
Authorities say images of preteen girls were found on Dongor's computer. He also is accused of stealing $40 to $60 from St. Joseph parish in Fitchburg on several occasions. He was released after pleading not guilty and suspended from ministry. It is believed he fled to his native Philippines.
2kool4skool
Posts: 1,804
Dec 31, 2011 6:48pm
All religions are a joke, Catholics are especially weird though.
skank
Posts: 6,543
Dec 31, 2011 8:32pm
Why are the posters from the public/parochial thread strangely absent?
Thread Bomber
Posts: 1,851
Dec 31, 2011 8:48pm
skank;1032860 wrote:Why are the posters from the public/parochial thread strangly absent?
They are recruiting dumb ass!
Curly J
Posts: 7,282
Dec 31, 2011 10:48pm
Come on they don't recruit. Everyone knows they were brought up through their programs....
HitsRus
Posts: 9,206
Jan 1, 2012 9:40pm
They do? I think that is an example of obviously wrongful thinking on the Church's part....20 YEARS AGO. To imply that this is S.O.P for the Church today is either ignorance or a less than honest attempt at a smear. The story you posted completely refutes your assertion as it appears the diocese worked to have the man defrocked. The Church/ Diocese has no civil authority to arrest or hold the man...he was released by the police.When a priest molest a little boy, they try and cover it up and hurry up and move the priest to another church so he can continue to rape young boys
password
Posts: 2,360
Jan 1, 2012 10:12pm
They defrocked this man because he had pictures of pre-teen girls on his computer and had stolen $60.00, not for molesting boys.HitsRus;1034300 wrote:They do? I think that is an example of obviously wrongful thinking on the Church's part....20 YEARS AGO. To imply that this is S.O.P for the Church today is either ignorance or a less than honest attempt at a smear. The story you posted completely refutes your assertion as it appears the diocese worked to have the man defrocked. The Church/ Diocese has no civil authority to arrest or hold the man...he was released by the police.
HitsRus
Posts: 9,206
Jan 1, 2012 10:26pm
^^^ you noticed that too????....so why are you talking about molesting little boys? This story has nothing to do with that.They defrocked this man because he had pictures of pre-teen girls on his computer and had stolen $60.00, not for molesting boys.
I
I Wear Pants
Posts: 16,223
Jan 1, 2012 11:12pm
The guy in the story isn't accused of molesting boys though.password;1034349 wrote:They defrocked this man because he had pictures of pre-teen girls on his computer and had stolen $60.00, not for molesting boys.
password
Posts: 2,360
Jan 1, 2012 11:27pm
That is my point, if he had pictures of pre-teen boys on his computer or was accused of molested young boys they would not have done anything.I Wear Pants;1034473 wrote:The guy in the story isn't accused of molesting boys though.
I
I Wear Pants
Posts: 16,223
Jan 1, 2012 11:28pm
Untrue. Perhaps if it was 20-30 years ago yes, but not now.
password
Posts: 2,360
Jan 1, 2012 11:32pm
I have not heard much about the church defrocking a priest for molesting boys lately, are you saying that the priest have stopped committing this crime?
I
I Wear Pants
Posts: 16,223
Jan 1, 2012 11:59pm
I'm saying that it happens as often as it does in the general populace and that you don't here a news story about everyone of them.
S
Sonofanump
Jan 2, 2012 8:47am
So your whole thread is a "if"? Wow.password;1034499 wrote:That is my point, if he had pictures of pre-teen boys on his computer or was accused of molested young boys they would not have done anything.
Skyhook79
Posts: 5,739
Jan 2, 2012 9:28am
http://www.guardianangelstore.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=39password;1034507 wrote:I have not heard much about the church defrocking a priest for molesting boys lately, are you saying that the priest have stopped committing this crime?
dwccrew
Posts: 7,817
Jan 2, 2012 12:29pm
So you're basing your argument on assumptions now? Eh, weak.....password;1034499 wrote:That is my point, if he had pictures of pre-teen boys on his computer or was accused of molested young boys they would not have done anything.