Maybe he just is sick and tired of playing for a bad team and doesn't care anymore.sleeper;1147630 wrote:Wall sucks. I've been saying that since he was drafted.
Let's compare him to a guy who has been hurt much much of the year.:rolleyes:Hb31187;1147633 wrote:He surely cant shoot, but hes still in the top half of the league as far as PG's id imagine(off the top of my head without thinking, so whoever is goin to nba.com and finding an entire list you can stop wasting your time)
Because I mean aside from his 3p%, his numbers are pretty close to the reigning MVP
I took that as comparing him to Rose's numbers last season.Skyhook79;1147693 wrote:Let's compare him to a guy who has been hurt much much of the year.:rolleyes:
Then it's no comparison then. Rose's #'s were better last year.Commander of Awesome;1147709 wrote:I took that as comparing him to Rose's numbers last season.
That's just wrong.Skyhook79;1147725 wrote:Then it's no comparison then. Rose's #'s were better last year.
So you are saying Wall's #'s are similar to Rose's in 2010-11 season?Commander of Awesome;1147727 wrote:That's just wrong.
Oh so you were proven yet again to be wrong so you're trying to change the subject?Skyhook79;1147734 wrote:So you are saying Wall's #'s are similar to Rose's in 2010-11 season?
Who's the 3rd for OKC, Harden, Iblocka, or Perkins?SportsAndLady;1147736 wrote:Which big 3 would you take:
Miami's or OKC's?
Yeah..dropped 40 last nightCommander of Awesome;1147739 wrote:Who's the 3rd for OKC, Harden?
I hate FAILami so I'm probably biased, but give me OKC.SportsAndLady;1147742 wrote:Yeah..dropped 40 last night
16.8 ppg this season, shooting 49%
Commander of Awesome;1147709 wrote:I took that as comparing him to Rose's numbers last season.
Skyhook79;1147725 wrote:Then it's no comparison then. Rose's #'s were better last year.
Commander of Awesome;1147727 wrote:That's just wrong.
Skyhook79;1147734 wrote:So you are saying Wall's #'s are similar to Rose's in 2010-11 season?
Typical.Commander of Awesome;1147738 wrote:Oh so you were proven yet again to be wrong so you're trying to change the subject?
No but I'd probably take Boston's big 4.wes_mantooth;1147749 wrote:Would you take either of those "big three"over Bostons from a couple years ago?
Thought so, thanks for trying failhook.Skyhook79;1147746 wrote:Typical.
Commander of Awesome;1147754 wrote:No but I'd probably take Boston's big 4.
Didn't Boston basically just have to go through the Lakers in their championship run? I know they beat the Cavs, but that wasn't a GREAT Cavs team. Although that series was the GOAT series; I still remember that game 7 where Lebron and Pierce were going shot for shot.wes_mantooth;1147749 wrote:Would you take either of those "big three"over Bostons from a couple years ago?
SportsAndLady;1147760 wrote:Didn't Boston basically just have to go through the Lakers in their championship run? I know they beat the Cavs, but that wasn't a GREAT Cavs team. Although that series was the GOAT series; I still remember that game 7 where Lebron and Pierce were going shot for shot.
Bulls were 41-41 in 09 when they played the Cavs. Before that it was 04-05.hoops23;1148217 wrote:When is the last time all 8 EC playoff teams were over .500?
The 76ers currently in the 8th spot at 32-30, it's possible it may happen.