Skyhook79
Posts: 5,739
Jan 1, 2012 7:14pm
Of course you do.killer_ewok;1034018 wrote:Agreed.
Azubuike24
Posts: 15,933
Jan 1, 2012 7:14pm
I said it before the replay. After it...CLEARLY.gerb131;1034013 wrote:Uh That was.
osu45804
Posts: 6,188
Jan 1, 2012 7:16pm
I don't care a lot of "experts" said we had the best chance to go winless & would be in hunt for the #1 Pick in the draft.... Bengals have A LOT of young talent, this is hopefully just the first step in something big in Cincy.... Redemption Time in Houston
Azubuike24
Posts: 15,933
Jan 1, 2012 7:16pm
Palmer throws an INT and Tebow is gonna sneak in the playoffs...
killer_ewok
Posts: 11,379
Jan 1, 2012 7:18pm
Skyhook79;1034020 wrote:Of course you do.
LOL. Even taking bias out of it...legit and blatant PI.
D
dave
Posts: 4,558
Jan 1, 2012 7:19pm
Dalton needs to play a lot better next week. He really made some questionable decisions today. Anyone know the time slots of the 2 AFC games next week? I'm guessing the Bengals end up at 1pm Sunday if that's an option. It will definitely be the least watched game.
Skyhook79
Posts: 5,739
Jan 1, 2012 7:19pm
Yeah, he is "sneaking" in just like the Bengals are except they (broncos) will be hosting a Playoff game.Azubuike24;1034030 wrote:Palmer throws an INT and Tebow is gonna sneak in the playoffs...
Azubuike24
Posts: 15,933
Jan 1, 2012 7:19pm
Host Pittsburgh...or at Houston?
I'd rather be on the road...wouldn't you? If those are the match-ups?
I'd rather be on the road...wouldn't you? If those are the match-ups?
D
dave
Posts: 4,558
Jan 1, 2012 7:21pm
Yeah losing to the #2 seed just like losing your last 3 games including 2 to sub .500 teams.Skyhook79;1034040 wrote:Yeah, he is "sneaking" in just like the Bengals are except they (broncos) will be hosting a Playoff game.
Skyhook79
Posts: 5,739
Jan 1, 2012 7:22pm
I'd rather be at home for the playoffs and playing Houston.Azubuike24;1034043 wrote:Host Pittsburgh...or at Houston?
I'd rather be on the road...wouldn't you? If those are the match-ups?
D
dave
Posts: 4,558
Jan 1, 2012 7:25pm
Someone besides OSU3443543r23 start the next thread, pretty sure the Bengals lose whenever he makes em.
Big_Mirg_ZHS
Posts: 2,079
Jan 1, 2012 7:26pm
FIFYSkyhook79;1034055 wrote:QQQQQQQ.
Skyhook79
Posts: 5,739
Jan 1, 2012 7:26pm
The Bengals started out 6-2 and finished 9-7 with a 1-6 record against teams with winning records.dave;1034054 wrote:Yeah losing to the #2 seed just like losing your last 3 games including 2 to sub .500 teams.
The Broncos started out 1-4 and finished 8-8 with a 1-4 record against teams with winning records and they beat the Bengals head to head.
They both sneaked in.
Hope this helps.
Azubuike24
Posts: 15,933
Jan 1, 2012 7:28pm
How would that be possible given that Houston was the 3 seed. Right now, honestly, Cincinnati is the 6th seed, but arguably the 4th best team left in the playoffs. Plus, they do have the revenge factor thing going into Houston. I'd rather be at home too, but it sets up nicely for the Bengals IMO. Even nicer for the Steelers.Skyhook79;1034055 wrote:I'd rather be at home for the playoffs and playing Houston.
Skyhook79
Posts: 5,739
Jan 1, 2012 7:33pm
I didn't say it was possible thats what I would prefer. I agree the Bengals are the 4th best team right now and do not like the Broncos chances but the steelers haven't been playing very good either and they do play down to the competition this year. Remember Seattle last year at 8-8 against the Saints?Azubuike24;1034083 wrote:How would that be possible given that Houston was the 3 seed. Right now, honestly, Cincinnati is the 6th seed, but arguably the 4th best team left in the playoffs. Plus, they do have the revenge factor thing going into Houston. I'd rather be at home too, but it sets up nicely for the Bengals IMO. Even nicer for the Steelers.
bigdaddy2003
Posts: 7,384
Jan 2, 2012 12:43am
This is a joke right?redstreak one;1033540 wrote:If you cant compete and beat a team like Baltimore, you dont need to be in there anyway!
redstreak one
Posts: 1,152
Jan 2, 2012 11:41am
I believe they played with Baltimore in both matchups. They have only been blown out 1 game at Pitt. Not a joke at all, I hate watching teams limp into the playoffs and get dismantled. The Bengals are Not in that situation this year.
bigdaddy2003
Posts: 7,384
Jan 2, 2012 11:46am
My mistake. I read it like you were saying Baltimore wasn't that good and that if the Bengals didn't win they didn't belong. After reading it again you meant if they beat Baltimore they definitely belonged in the playoff picture.redstreak one;1034763 wrote:I believe they played with Baltimore in both matchups. They have only been blown out 1 game at Pitt. Not a joke at all, I hate watching teams limp into the playoffs and get dismantled. The Bengals are Not in that situation this year.