Rip it to shreds, gents (and ladies because I know there are a few moms on here! Shout out to ZAM!!!)

01. Olentangy
02. Marysville
03. Hilliard Davidson
03. Teays Valley
05. Lancaster
06. Dublin Coffman
07. Pickerington North
08. Olentangy Orange
09. Olentangy Liberty
10. Hilliard Bradley

Individuals:

106: 1. Gutierrez (PN), 2. Wimer (CC), 3. Nace (TV).
113: 1. Spearman (L), 2. Sparks (M), 3. Riley (MV).
120: 1. Timchenko (OO), 2. Penzone (OL) or Lucas (O), 3. The other one.
126: 1. Murdock (DC), 2. Donatelli (HD), 3. McCurdy (DH).
132: 1. Fiorucci (O), 2. Nace (TV), 3. D. McDougle (GL).
138: 1. Forrider (M), 2. Ryan (OL), 3. Boswell (CW).
145: 1. Luft (TV), 2. Fosco (O), 3. Tullius (CW).
152: 1. Zoeller (HB), 2. Hauber (CC), 3. Dawson (OO).
160: 1. Miller (M), 2. McCourt (DC), 3. Bridges (O).
170: 1. Pickett (CC), 2. Brown (WC), 3. Fox (DS).
182: 1. Leidecker (TV), 2. Lybarger (MV), 3. Shackleford (TW).
195: 1. Dick (GC), 2. Reed (RB), 3. Mayberry (WK).
220: 1. Stinemetz (O), 2. King (DS), 3. Taylor (M).
285: 1. Elflein (PN), 2. Young (O), 3. Fleming (OL).

This went out to the coaches via email. However, I wouldn't mind reading your thoughts, Chatter Nation.

Two things as you read these...
#1) A kid is yet to be ranked if he is yet to wrestle.
#2) I'll wait until he drops to rank him at that "projected" weight.

Whatever, dude.

One last thing... There is a VERY good chance that I missed a result. Just let me know. I'm not trying to slight anyone.

what about Lancaster what is the line up they should be real good in a dual , i don't know if TV is that strong in duals this year,
they get lots of 3rd and and rack up pins in the tourn.

106 marysville is real good , nace TV , westerville North, Rey billy li, garett from hilliard darby was big, gill Hdav

I would definitely have the Gales up there prolly even top 5.
They looked very good taking a 3rd at a tough Marysville duals tourney taking care of Darby in that placement match.

Thanks for getting these out early this yr Mr Ambassador!
Good seeing you Sat Gratz on the HC position!

Lets see some of these hammers at Darby's open mat tonight so we can challenge those NE studs at the Schott!

I'm not sure how they got cut out on the transfer. The are DEFINITELY a top team in the area.

Exhibit B, I suppose!!!

theviking;1019812 wrote:what about Lancaster what is the line up they should be real good in a dual , i don't know if TV is that strong in duals this year,
they get lots of 3rd and and rack up pins in the tourn.

Sandbagger! LOL!
You guys looked REAL good Sat!
Gratz on the PN win.

cruiser_96;1019877 wrote:I'm not sure how they got cut out on the transfer. The are DEFINITELY a top team in the area.

Exhibit B, I suppose!!!

So I guess that means where back on the outside looking in eh?

They are on my master list. I'm not sure what happened. I looked back at the email and they weren't on it. Not sure what's going on around here anymore!!!

Anywho, I had them at 5 on my initial list but am getting cussed at by a guy who knows someone who knows a kid on the team. They could very well beat Davidson and Teays in a dual! But unless enough coaches have them at 3rd or 4th, then here's what I have.

Cthelites;1019883 wrote:So I guess that means where back on the outside looking in eh?

I can't imagine for too long though. Once OCC duals kick in, things get clearer. Also, the Porter is a terrific tournament for individuals. I'm anticipating Bradley results.

cruiser_96;1019887 wrote:They are on my master list. I'm not sure what happened. I looked back at the email and they weren't on it. Not sure what's going on around here anymore!!!

Anywho, I had them at 5 on my initial list but am getting cussed at by a guy who knows someone who knows a kid on the team. They could very well beat Davidson and Teays in a dual! But unless enough coaches have them at 3rd or 4th, then here's what I have.

Why don't you spend some of the huge salary you are being paid to compile these rankings and hire an editor to proofread the info before you send it out I think you could hire cthelites for cheap!!

Yes!!! That is it, D4S!!! Actually, what I could do, is invest it over the next three years and just use the interest to pay that salary!?!?!? Duuuuude!!! We're taking LAP OR LUXURY!!!

Good call, D4S. Thanks for looking out. Also, good to see the boy - and Co. - on Saturday. That was a great group.

I dont know about that d4s. The lights might have a slight bias with his editing skills lol.
I nominate the Cut and Paste King!

Holla, Cruiser! Shout out back atcha.

I know im partial to the Mville kids but u would have to put Boyd somewhere at 145, beat Aaron Tholman from Sprigboro, who later handelled Tullius 5-1

Monkey Man;1020367 wrote:I know im partial to the Mville kids but u would have to put Boyd somewhere at 145, beat Aaron Tholman from Sprigboro, who later handelled Tullius 5-1

Tullius gave Luft one of his closest matches of the year last Sat. Luft appears to be head and shoulders above the D1 area 145's. I hear what you are saying, but sometimes you can run into trouble by comparing scores. What is more important is how 2 specific wrestlers' styles match up. I look for Tullius to certify at 138.....

Dad4Sports;1020387 wrote:Tullius gave Luft one of his closest matches of the year last Sat. Luft appears to be head and shoulders above the D1 area 145's. I hear what you are saying, but sometimes you can run into trouble by comparing scores. What is more important is how 2 specific wrestlers' styles match up. I look for Tullius to certify at 138.....

Im not saying he is better, but Tholman the real deal, took Luft into overtime state qualifier, I saw Tullius he is big i would be surprised if he goes 138

I am not partial to marysville kids and i would have him right after luft.

Monkey Man;1020391 wrote:Im not saying he is better, but Tholman the real deal, took Luft into overtime state qualifier, I saw Tullius he is big i would be surprised if he goes 138

Weighing about 140-141 during the week

Dad4Sports;1020409 wrote:Weighing about 140-141 during the week

Wow, he looked big at Marysville

Certainly not the first to mention Boyd. He's a handful, and I would have NO problem putting him in. Word on the street is top 4 for Dispatch coaches' poll. Ooooooooooooohhh!!!!!!!!!!!!!

ZAM: holla!!!

If top 4 go to state, why do we not rank top 4? It just doesn't make sense...I await a reasonable reply.

Especially in the central district that 4th guy seems to alway be such a wild card. Probably the reason only three are ranked.

The OCC Capital at 152 should be real competitive!

only thing i noticed was at 160, Bridges was beaten by chris weber of midpark who ventresca of orange decked in 43 seconds.