B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
Dec 19, 2011 10:02am
Big time. Even Greg Little, for all of his drops, is more of a weapon than Cribbs, imo. All Cribbs is good at is whining and flapping his gums.Commander of Awesome;1019839 wrote:Disagree, have you not watched him this season? He's lost 2 steps.
se-alum
Posts: 13,948
Dec 19, 2011 10:39am
Cribbs could be a weapon if he is used correctly. Get him some screen passes, end arounds, maybe some trick plays. He's not near the return man he used to be though. I'd like to see screen returning for the rest of the year.
Pick6
Posts: 14,946
Dec 19, 2011 10:57am
Thats what I was meaning. He is even probably the leading tackler on special teams. The new rule has limited him a lot, IMO. Still sets the Browns up in decent field position when they need it (I could be thinking of last year).se-alum;1019878 wrote:Cribbs could be a weapon if he is used correctly. Get him some screen passes, end arounds, maybe some trick plays. He's not near the return man he used to be though.
DeyDurkie5
Posts: 11,324
Dec 19, 2011 11:00am
oh yeah that's it...Shurmur, in all his great offensive genius, is playing for his qb this next draft. It's not the fact he is awful at running an offense?BR1986FB;1019734 wrote:May have been mentioned but after what I saw yesterday, I firmly believe that Shurmur was playing for a draft pick so he could get "his guy" at QB.
dazedconfused
Posts: 2,662
Dec 19, 2011 5:04pm
i could get behind this because it actually signifies some sort of "plan" from shurmur. plus, sam bradford wasn't awful last season either.BR1986FB;1019734 wrote:May have been mentioned but after what I saw yesterday, I firmly believe that Shurmur was playing for a draft pick so he could get "his guy" at QB.
like_that
Posts: 26,625
Dec 19, 2011 6:28pm
Sorry, but Shurmur's play calling at the end of the game was inexcusable, I don't give a shit about "playing to get 'his' guy." He has to learn how to handle close game situations, and so far this season he has failed miserably almost every game. In fact the only reason he didn't fail in the other games is because the opposing team failed miserably down the stretch.dazedconfused;1020350 wrote:i could get behind this because it actually signifies some sort of "plan" from shurmur. plus, sam bradford wasn't awful last season either.
If he is a pussy now, he is going to be a pussy in the future. He isn't going to all of a sudden flip a switch and be a good play caller in close game situations. The consolation out of all this is the Browns didn't fall down the draft order, but if this game had playoff implications we all would be livid.
Shurmur better find a way to get his balls to drop over the off season, because his pussy mentality is rubbing off on the rest of the team.
W
wghfan
Posts: 744
Dec 19, 2011 6:47pm
Shurmur has got to be fired, if the Browns want to move forward. Why the Browns picked this guy is beyond me.
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Dec 19, 2011 7:49pm
like_that;1020426 wrote:Sorry, but Shurmur's play calling at the end of the game was inexcusable, I don't give a **** about "playing to get 'his' guy." He has to learn how to handle close game situations, and so far this season he has failed miserably almost every game. In fact the only reason he didn't fail in the other games is because the opposing team failed miserably down the stretch.
If he is a **** now, he is going to be a **** in the future. He isn't going to all of a sudden flip a switch and be a good play caller in close game situations. The consolation out of all this is the Browns didn't fall down the draft order, but if this game had playoff implications we all would be livid.
Shurmur better find a way to get his balls to drop over the off season, because his **** mentality is rubbing off on the rest of the team.
+1
hoops23
Posts: 15,696
Dec 19, 2011 9:49pm
I'm not for firing another coach.
Stability is something we've lacked. It's something we need. 1 season, with this poorest talent doesn't give him a fair evaluation.
Stability is something we've lacked. It's something we need. 1 season, with this poorest talent doesn't give him a fair evaluation.
killer_ewok
Posts: 11,379
Dec 19, 2011 9:57pm
I thought the Browns won this game until I saw the highlights on NBC last night. Not sure why I was surprised that they blew it, but I kinda was.
Commander of Awesome
Posts: 23,151
Dec 19, 2011 10:02pm
We know.killer_ewok;1020769 wrote:I'm a douchebag troll.
killer_ewok
Posts: 11,379
Dec 19, 2011 10:07pm
Just a post about the game. Please stop the QQ.Commander of Awesome;1020790 wrote:We know.
DeyDurkie5
Posts: 11,324
Dec 19, 2011 10:08pm
steelers losing, you come on here and post that. interesting, i thought notre dame/steelers fans were perfect, yet i see a troll.killer_ewok;1020769 wrote:I thought the Browns won this game until I saw the highlights on NBC last night. Not sure why I was surprised that they blew it, but I kinda was.
killer_ewok
Posts: 11,379
Dec 19, 2011 10:12pm
Geesh. Just a post about the game. No fans are perfect. Trolling? Nah, you must be sensitive.DeyDurkie5;1020808 wrote:steelers losing, you come on here and post that. interesting, i thought notre dame/steelers fans were perfect, yet i see a troll.
DeyDurkie5
Posts: 11,324
Dec 19, 2011 10:15pm
I'll keep this in mind, for when i make one comment about notre dame and you get on the thread crying like a little girlkiller_ewok;1020820 wrote:Geesh. Just a post about the game. No fans are perfect. Trolling? Nah, you must be sensitive.
killer_ewok
Posts: 11,379
Dec 19, 2011 10:17pm
Okay. Sounds good.DeyDurkie5;1020827 wrote:I'll keep this in mind, for when i make one comment about notre dame and you get on the thread crying like a little girl
wes_mantooth
Posts: 17,977
Dec 20, 2011 12:30am
lol..the nerve of you to give your opinion on the game.killer_ewok;1020769 wrote:I thought the Browns won this game until I saw the highlights on NBC last night. Not sure why I was surprised that they blew it, but I kinda was.
dazedconfused
Posts: 2,662
Dec 20, 2011 4:46am
Commander of Awesome;1020790 wrote:We know.
damn, tough crowdDeyDurkie5;1020808 wrote:steelers losing, you come on here and post that. interesting, i thought notre dame/steelers fans were perfect, yet i see a troll.
DeyDurkie5
Posts: 11,324
Dec 20, 2011 8:27am
in the middle of the steelers losing? something smells fishywes_mantooth;1021281 wrote:lol..the nerve of you to give your opinion on the game.
like_that
Posts: 26,625
Dec 20, 2011 8:31am
lol at QQ_Wok being butt hurt.
killer_ewok
Posts: 11,379
Dec 20, 2011 10:26am
DeyDurkie5;1021438 wrote:in the middle of the steelers losing? something smells fishy
Just making a statement about the game. No big deal. At least I don't think so.
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
Dec 20, 2011 10:29am
Didn't really see it as trolling. Now had he said "if it's brown, flush it down" or some other stupid Steeler "funny', it would've been trolling. Replay has overturned the "trolling" call.
killer_ewok
Posts: 11,379
Dec 20, 2011 10:31am
like_that;1021445 wrote:lol at QQ_Wok being butt hurt.
Just a post about the game.
Based on a few of these recent posts on here...if I'm butt hurt....I'm not the only one. Sorry, guys....I thought non-Browns fans were allowed to post on this thread too. I don't mind if you guys post on Steeler threads like you do. Not sure why the feeling isn't mutual. Maybe we should all stop the QQ and be allowed to talk sports.
DeyDurkie5
Posts: 11,324
Dec 20, 2011 10:31am
the replay booth was actually out of service, so no replay could be given. therefore, as usual, steelers fans are wrong. browns winBR1986FB;1021623 wrote:Didn't really see it as trolling. Now had he said "if it's brown, flush it down" or some other stupid Steeler "funny', it would've been trolling. Replay has overturned the "trolling" call.
killer_ewok
Posts: 11,379
Dec 20, 2011 10:31am
BR1986FB;1021623 wrote:Didn't really see it as trolling. Now had he said "if it's brown, flush it down" or some other stupid Steeler "funny', it would've been trolling. Replay has overturned the "trolling" call.
Thank you.