gut wrote:
The legs have way too clean of an edge, more like a pant leg of hunting gear than a hairy limb.
Amazing when you think about it that people really believe bigfoot exists. I thought the scientist in the article made good points - there'd be a dead body by now and SOMEONE would have had to have gotten good pics by now. It's in OH then MIN and who knows where else. That means there is more than one, and there'd have to be for breeding. It's impossible for something that size not to have left any traces, and I don't consider the footprints to be credible.
Haven't you learned by now there is no place for logic when discussing Bigfoot, The Loch Ness Monster, Abominable Snowman or any other 'monster' myth?
