RedRider1;1094120 wrote:but to some it will be easy to connect the dots and assume.
Coach_08;1094438 wrote:I am pretty close to the situation and know some information, I just chose to not give out that information. There was some misinformation out there and you know how people love to assume things.
Tim Durham, the co owner of Fair Financial and his lawyers were making statements like- "Don't make assumptions based on how the known facts look. I'm innocent, I just can't tell you anything"
Ask the several thousand locals around Wooster who lost money how that worked out.
Now I'm not comparing Tim Durham to the Smithville BOE, BB or anyone else. I'm comparing both situations lack of transparency and what happens when opaque operating procedures are allowed to run unchecked.
Green Local schools are public. They operate on public money. The public should know just how this went down. Transparency is trust. Trust without transparency will lead to corruption and abuse of power 99% of the time.
RR1 & coach08, I have no beef with either of you. I just don't agree that assumptions shouldn't be made when official sources are using gag orders and operating under an informational blackout. Assumption leads to rebuttal, which keeps the topic alive and may wind up with the truth coming out.
Now I know that "to assume makes an ___ out of you and me" & assumption is the mother of all __________ups" but in this case it's necessary. If no information is given, no other alternatives exist.
If shenanigans like this don't get addressed, it will get worse.
Anybody get my point here? Any opinions?