I dont go to games. I just make things up...if I were a betting man, though, I would guess that varsity QB Joe Dreher helped with the chains today...and I would also guess that he is probably a humble, down to earth guy. Now thats just speculation.wcalfan;1277518 wrote:Did you go to the JV game, oh wise one?
I saw you fence huggerghostrider;1277583 wrote:I dont go to games. I just make things up...if I were a betting man, though, I would guess that varsity QB Joe Dreher helped with the chains today...and I would also guess that he is probably a humble, down to earth guy. Now thats just speculation.
Who am I now? You seem to know me.
This is absolutely great! I commend Norwayne's sportsmanship, and you cast stones. You add nothing to this forum but drama, DAD.wcalfan;1277645 wrote:I saw you fence hugger
wcalfan;1277119 wrote:YOU are talking to me about throwing someone under the bus? That is all this forum does on a weekly basis.
Like I have said on here many times...the day that YOU start criticizing people's character....well, I won't finish but I think you know where I am going.
If it isn't the "regulars" on here talking then it doesn't count. Who annointed the "regulars" anyway? What is their background? Anyone can call themself an expert. Think about this...ghost has been on here for a week or so and he is already referring to himself as an "analyst"...STUPID (yuck, yuck)
What? The all-caps is supposed to mean something big fella? Come on now.MOUNTAINBEAR;1277692 wrote:GHOST-BEAST-SOME OTHERS! SERIOUSLY HAVE THIS INDIVIDUAL WORKED UP. BE WILLING TO BET THIS INDIVIDUAL IS EITHER A CLOSE FRIEND OR RELATIVE OF COACH Z. WANNA BET. MAYBE NEVER EVEN PLAYED FOOTBALL. PROBABLY PLAYED TUBA OR FRENCH HORN AT HALF TIME. STANLEY KID IS A FRESHMAN PLAYING, OBVIUSLY DOSENT NEED REPS, HE STARTS. WE PUT A SCHLACKING ON DAWGS ONE YEAR 50-0, I NEVER SAW THE FIELD AGAIN AFTER HALFTIME. MOST COACHES, MOST GOOD COACHES KNOW WHEN TO THROW IN THE TOWEL. LET YOUR 2ND-3RD-SCRUBS GET THE TIME. WHAT THAT HURTS IS THE KIDS WRESTLING SEASON. BECAUSE BIG THINGS ARE GONNA HAPPEN WITH THIS KID. BUT UNFORTUNATE THINGS HAPPEN SOMETIMES IN THE WACKY WORLD OF SPORTS. KIDS A STUD-HE WILL BE BACK WITH A CHIP ON HIS SHOULDER-KING KID BEAT UP PRETTY GOOD TOO. STILL SAY THOSE STARTERS SHOULD HAVE BEEN SAT DOWN. BEAST-PROMISE I WILL LAY OFF Z FOR AWHILE. JUST FRUSTRATING TO SEE ONE OF THE ELITE OF WCAL FALL SO FAR. PRAY THE FOOTBALL GODS WILL SMILE UPON US AGAIN!!!!!!!!SOON!
Love the all-caps. What? Does that get you more notice?MOUNTAINBEAR;1277692 wrote:GHOST-BEAST-SOME OTHERS! SERIOUSLY HAVE THIS INDIVIDUAL WORKED UP. BE WILLING TO BET THIS INDIVIDUAL IS EITHER A CLOSE FRIEND OR RELATIVE OF COACH Z. WANNA BET. MAYBE NEVER EVEN PLAYED FOOTBALL. PROBABLY PLAYED TUBA OR FRENCH HORN AT HALF TIME. STANLEY KID IS A FRESHMAN PLAYING, OBVIUSLY DOSENT NEED REPS, HE STARTS. WE PUT A SCHLACKING ON DAWGS ONE YEAR 50-0, I NEVER SAW THE FIELD AGAIN AFTER HALFTIME. MOST COACHES, MOST GOOD COACHES KNOW WHEN TO THROW IN THE TOWEL. LET YOUR 2ND-3RD-SCRUBS GET THE TIME. WHAT THAT HURTS IS THE KIDS WRESTLING SEASON. BECAUSE BIG THINGS ARE GONNA HAPPEN WITH THIS KID. BUT UNFORTUNATE THINGS HAPPEN SOMETIMES IN THE WACKY WORLD OF SPORTS. KIDS A STUD-HE WILL BE BACK WITH A CHIP ON HIS SHOULDER-KING KID BEAT UP PRETTY GOOD TOO. STILL SAY THOSE STARTERS SHOULD HAVE BEEN SAT DOWN. BEAST-PROMISE I WILL LAY OFF Z FOR AWHILE. JUST FRUSTRATING TO SEE ONE OF THE ELITE OF WCAL FALL SO FAR. PRAY THE FOOTBALL GODS WILL SMILE UPON US AGAIN!!!!!!!!SOON!
Seems like you know a thing or two about spewing yourself there....internet hero!wcalfan;1275599 wrote:With the number of current/former parents that are now given a voice on this thing and have spewed their vomit on here..
How'd that go?wcalfan;1275599 wrote:7:00 at the picnic tables.
So people who don't share your views have a distinct smell?.....that you can detect?wcalfan;1275603 wrote:Believe me fence hugger...yea I now remember seeing you standing right along with them (plus you "smell" like one),
I never read a post from either claiming to have all the answers.......maybe you smelled that and the rest of us didn'twcalfan;1276318 wrote:I would think my heroes ghost or eyes would want to start a thread since they have all the answers.
this is good advice...you should take it, because OPINIONS ARE ALLOWED....even yours.wcalfan;1276583 wrote: but all the effort was for nothing.
If your ability to enjoy your team requires everyone share your opinion.....then you have problems only psychotropic medication can begin to address.wcalfan;1276588 wrote:Enjoy my team? How can that ever happen again with clowns like eyes and ghost filling peoples heads with the crap they spew out?
quit teasing mewcalfan;1276613 wrote: Wait...I better stop....ha!
that didn't last longwcalfan;1277015 wrote:Didn't feel like talking tonight.
Like I said....medication, counseling and institutionalization might help you with your delusional belief that your opinion should be shared by everyone.wcalfan;1277032 wrote:Is this guy serious? And others on here wonder why I get so upset with people like him.
You're a regular now....internet hero....welcome to the club you despise!wcalfan;1277119 wrote:YOU are talking to me about throwing someone under the bus? That is all this forum does on a weekly basis.
Like I have said on here many times...the day that YOU start criticizing people's character....well, I won't finish but I think you know where I am going.
If it isn't the "regulars" on here talking then it doesn't count. Who annointed the "regulars" anyway? What is their background? Anyone can call themself an expert. Think about this...ghost has been on here for a week or so and he is already referring to himself as an "analyst"...STUPID (yuck, yuck)
Did you see him...or just smell him?wcalfan;1277645 wrote:I saw you fence hugger
Im now a betting man (see, things CAN change) Im willing to bet ANY amount that YOU did not see ME hugging a fence. You are simply delusional. Talk football and drop the detective work. Your drama craving antics are comedy relief for most on here, and quite embarassing for you. You are SO far off base with your assumptions.wcalfan;1277645 wrote:I saw you fence hugger
Never was a big proponent of worrying about running up of the score. Granted, I agree that it is wise to get underclassmen experience, but if they're scoring, you let them score.Bloody Toothbrush;1277800 wrote:On the subject of Dalton leaving their 1st stringers in after being down by 40.....What's the problem? I don't see it.
Dalton was trying to come back.....even if it wasn't gonna happen, you still gotta try.
Speaking of blowouts.....I personally don't think anybody is running up the score. The Norwayne game I saw against Wellington could have been 90-10 if the Cats kept their starters in, same with Hillsdale vs Dalton, the Falcons pulled their RBs in the middle of the 3rd. My opinion is when your up big, reign it in a little and when your down big....keep tryin' to get back in it. If it ends up 86-8....oh well.
Last night Rumhole took me to see Kirtland/Cuyahoga Hts......it's gonna be a good game he says......40-7 final score. Kirtland is good....the game was not. If any local D5 teams run across Kirtland, it's gonna be ugly. If you've never been to Cuyahoga Hts to watch a game, you should check it out. A real nice D5 stadium with turf and interesting seating setup.
Smithville/Northwestern looks like the big WCAL game this week......a must win for both.
area wide....the OCC has been having some great games. West Holmes looks to be the real deal.
I know when I was playing on some pretty rough norwayne teams it always felt like a kick in the junk when you were getting beat bad and the other team pulled out the starters who you battled agianst all night for some freshman jv squadO-Trap;1277811 wrote:Never was a big proponent of worrying about running up of the score. Granted, I agree that it is wise to get underclassmen experience, but if they're scoring, you let them score.
There is a game from just over a decade ago that I always bring up, and it usually gets a strong response, but I was on the sideline, and the coaches were getting the newest of the newbies playing time.
Any time Smithville has gotten drubbed in recent memory, my thought was not on the other team's running up the score. It was always on how Smithville should have stopped them.
That is, after all, the job of the defense, right?
Yeah. We never got drubbed too bad, but I do know that I wanted to face those same guys I'd faced all night if we were losing. If they had kicked our butts all night, even some revenge on the very last play would have been sweeter than ushering in the scrubs. For the purpose of experience, I understood, but I always hated it.99bobcatdb;1277825 wrote:I know when I was playing on some pretty rough norwayne teams it always felt like a kick in the junk when you were getting beat bad and the other team pulled out the starters who you battled agianst all night for some freshman jv squad
Yea there is no perfect answer or call. Coaches just have to do what they think is best for each situation and what is best for their team. We can just sit back on comment on their decisions. Nothing like a bunch on Monday morning QB's like us all on this siteO-Trap;1277830 wrote:Yeah. We never got drubbed too bad, but I do know that I wanted to face those same guys I'd faced all night if we were losing. If they had kicked our butts all night, even some revenge on the very last play would have been sweeter than ushering in the scrubs. For the purpose of experience, I understood, but I always hated it.
Bingo. 80-6. You've got the bottom of the depth chart gaining a minimum of seven yards a carry running right up the gut. When your 3rd string JV running back cranks off a 20-yard run on an 0-trap, what do you do?Bloody Toothbrush;1277858 wrote:The blowout conversation could be a hot topic the few weeks as Norwayne has got Chippewa and Dalton coming up and Rittman still has yet to play Hillsdale, Smithville and Northwestern.
and Otrap....I think I know the game you speak of.....Smithville vs New London in 2002? It's always a no win situation when you've cleared the bench scoring 80 pts and there's STILL time on the clock. Whatever you do, you'll get ripped for it.....but that's Football.
LOL I know this guy aint on the fence with dad.....you're killin me.wcalfan;1277734 wrote: Maybe if you get off the fence with dad, you would know that.
When we beat Dalton that bad, who was coaching? Hmmmmmm......
1_beast;1277879 wrote:LOL I know this guy aint on the fence with dad.....you're killin me.
As for the coach question...Im going to say Jeff Souers. Just a hunch.
ghostrider;1277782 wrote:Im now a betting man (see, things CAN change) Im willing to bet ANY amount that YOU did not see ME hugging a fence. You are simply delusional. Talk football and drop the detective work. Your drama craving antics are comedy relief for most on here, and quite embarassing for you. You are SO far off base with your assumptions.
How will the Bears rebound in Jeromesville, missing a few starters to injury? Two key players may be done for the year. Is it time to just hand to reins over to the mighty freshman class?
Its personal preference.Bobcat;1278034 wrote:I thought I'd ask the question of the posters on here. It's been commented on several times but let's get everyones opinion. Is the 3rd qtr fair game for a teams 1st string offense when they are destroying the opposing team at half. 99bobcatdb and a couple others on here think it is. I dont think it is. The comment was in reference to Norwaynes stud RB running the ball many times deep into the 3rd qtr up by 56 points. If that ok should Norwayne keep throwin to the WR's in the 3rd? Keep in mind it's been nothing for Norwayne to go to the air and score 4 or 5 times in a qtr. Norwaynes QB completed 10 passes Friday night for 269 yards and 5 or 6 touchdowns. It's reasonable to believe, if they were passing, Norwayne would have scored again..probably more than once. What do you think?
I believe 3rd quarter is fair game, but you should be respectful and have sportsmanship. If you are up my 56 at half I don't think you need to air it out every play, but it is the defense job to stop the offense. I feel it would be poor coaching on norwayne part if they did not play their key players in the 3rd. Every kid on every team is just that a kid. They need reps no matter how good you are. When weeks 8,9, and 10 are here they will need those reps they got in the other games 3rd quarters. They have to play more than half a session in the play offs and maybe state gameBobcat;1278034 wrote:I thought I'd ask the question of the posters on here. It's been commented on several times but let's get everyones opinion. Is the 3rd qtr fair game for a teams 1st string offense when they are destroying the opposing team at half. 99bobcatdb and a couple others on here think it is. I dont think it is. The comment was in reference to Norwaynes stud RB running the ball many times deep into the 3rd qtr up by 56 points. If that ok should Norwayne keep throwin to the WR's in the 3rd? Keep in mind it's been nothing for Norwayne to go to the air and score 4 or 5 times in a qtr. Norwaynes QB completed 10 passes Friday night for 269 yards and 5 or 6 touchdowns. It's reasonable to believe, if they were passing, Norwayne would have scored again..probably more than once. What do you think?
