M
mhs95_06
Posts: 8,167
Nov 18, 2011 11:54pm
Somber weekend coming for Ok. St.
Ironman92
Posts: 49,363
Nov 18, 2011 11:54pm
Geaux Houston!!!
Ironman92
Posts: 49,363
Nov 18, 2011 11:55pm
killer_ewok;978781 wrote:Neil fuckin' Diamond
Sweet Caroline...ghey, ghey, ghey
M
mhs95_06
Posts: 8,167
Nov 18, 2011 11:55pm
I wouldn't count on that!gorocks99;978768 wrote:GAME OVER. LSU-Alabama #2 is set.
Ironman92
Posts: 49,363
Nov 18, 2011 11:55pm
Too many men in the huddle?
F
Footwedge
Posts: 9,265
Nov 18, 2011 11:56pm
Will never happen. Look for the hairy Beavers to be back.gorocks99;978768 wrote:GAME OVER. LSU-Alabama #2 is set.
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Nov 18, 2011 11:57pm
Ironman92;978786 wrote:Too many men in the huddle?
There was a flag on the play at least according to ESPN's graphic at the bottom of the screen.
Ironman92
Posts: 49,363
Nov 18, 2011 11:57pm
Ironman92;978705 wrote:OK State better realize this is National Championship or bust.
Not a man
Jughead
Posts: 1,261
Nov 19, 2011 12:00am
Oh my. That FG was good.
M
mhs95_06
Posts: 8,167
Nov 19, 2011 12:04am
I think they are already 3 times as high over the crossbar as they were originally. Could they keep them square and plumb with 15 more feet? This would have been interesting if they were higher. Looked like the centerline of the ball was slightly inside the centerline of the upright, but was it enough to be able to deflect over the crossbar? I don't think so!Ironman92;978721 wrote:Looked good but tv angle wasn't dead on
Why don't they make the goal posts 15 feet higher?
F
Footwedge
Posts: 9,265
Nov 19, 2011 12:07am
Ok State db clearly kicked the ball carrier in the end zone after the play was over.karen lotz;978788 wrote:There was a flag on the play at least according to ESPN's graphic at the bottom of the screen.
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Nov 19, 2011 12:08am
Footwedge;978796 wrote:Ok State db clearly kicked the ball carrier in the end zone after the play was over.
thug
dazedconfused
Posts: 2,662
Nov 19, 2011 12:12am
no way oregon makes up the .344 difference with usc, osu, and whichever awful team comes out of the south division
F
Footwedge
Posts: 9,265
Nov 19, 2011 12:18am
It will not be Alabama and LSU. Wom't happen. You don't win your league, then you don't go. Coaches and writers will override computers. Plus, there's a good chance LSU loses before the season ends.dazedconfused;978802 wrote:no way oregon makes up the .344 difference with usc, osu, and whichever awful team comes out of the south division
M
mhs95_06
Posts: 8,167
Nov 19, 2011 12:27am
How about a BCS NC game of Ga. vs. Ok. St.?
Jughead
Posts: 1,261
Nov 19, 2011 12:32am
False. Oklahoma lost the Big 12 Championship in 2003 and still went to lose to #2 LSU in the Nokia Sugar Bowl.Footwedge;978813 wrote:It will not be Alabama and LSU. Wm't happen. You don't win your league, then you don't go. Coaches and writers will override computers. Plus, there's a good chance LSU loses before the season ends.
I agree that this is the way it should be, but alas, it's not.
jordo212000
Posts: 10,664
Nov 19, 2011 12:39am
so... would it be a rematch of LSU - Oregon instead hahaFootwedge;978813 wrote:It will not be Alabama and LSU. Wom't happen. You don't win your league, then you don't go. Coaches and writers will override computers. Plus, there's a good chance LSU loses before the season ends.
dazedconfused
Posts: 2,662
Nov 19, 2011 12:41am
i hate rematches in general in bowl games let alone in the national championship game. i also hate that alabama's loss to lsu is somehow considered better than oregon's loss to lsu
jordo212000
Posts: 10,664
Nov 19, 2011 12:45am
Yeah I'm not sure how Alabama's loss could ever be considered "good." They lost at home!dazedconfused;978843 wrote:i also hate that alabama's loss to lsu is somehow considered better than oregon's loss to lsu
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Nov 19, 2011 12:51am
How would you say Oregon's loss is better than Alabama's? They were dominated.
dazedconfused
Posts: 2,662
Nov 19, 2011 1:00am
how is alabama missing four field goals at home any different than a true freshmen fumbling on consecutive possessions and thus leading to two tds? they both gift-wrapped wins for lsukaren lotz;978852 wrote:How would you say Oregon's loss is better than Alabama's? They were dominated.
F
Footwedge
Posts: 9,265
Nov 19, 2011 1:20am
It will not happen...period. The Oklahoma debacle is the reason that it won't happen. The coaches over rode a one loss Michigan team and stuck in a 2 loss LSU team in 2006/07.Jughead;978828 wrote:False. Oklahoma lost the Big 12 Championship in 2003 and still went to lose to #2 LSU in the Nokia Sugar Bowl.
I agree that this is the way it should be, but alas, it's not.
athlete37
Posts: 992
Nov 19, 2011 1:30am
That explains why the Oklahoma 2003 deal happened 2 years after they did the same thing for Nebraska?? I guess the third time people are smarter?Footwedge;978870 wrote:It will not happen...period. The Oklahoma debacle is the reason that it won't happen. The coaches over rode a one loss Michigan team and stuck in a 2 loss LSU team in 2006/07.
F
Footwedge
Posts: 9,265
Nov 19, 2011 1:46am
Yes...they are smarter now. I posted this above...no Michigan- Ohio State rematch. Especially....a rematch in the same division of the same conference...the coaches and writers won't let it happen.athlete37;978877 wrote:That explains why the Oklahoma 2003 deal happened 2 years after they did the same thing for Nebraska?? I guess the third time people are smarter?
Mulva
Posts: 13,650
Nov 19, 2011 1:49am
It wasn't a "better loss", but Oregon wasn't dominated at all. They killed themselves with turnovers.karen lotz;978852 wrote:How would you say Oregon's loss is better than Alabama's? They were dominated.
The 1st half of the game was very equal, and Oregon actually outgained LSU overall. If DeAnthony Thomas holds on to the ball in the 3rd quarter it's a totally different game.