dwccrew
Posts: 7,817
Nov 14, 2011 12:13am
Fortunately in '87 and '88 I was 5 and 6 yrs old so I am glad I don't remember those debacles. I do remember '99 and that was terrible.darbypitcher22;971767 wrote:Must be forgetting about that 6-6 debacle we had in '99, or the back to back 4-6-1 and 6-4-1 campaigns of '88 and '87 respectively...
darbypitcher22
Posts: 8,000
Nov 14, 2011 7:41am
I wasn't born yet either but heard my dad complain enough about them, plus read about them in Jack Park's OSU football encyclopedia to get the idea that those were the DARK days...dwccrew;972119 wrote:Fortunately in '87 and '88 I was 5 and 6 yrs old so I am glad I don't remember those debacles. I do remember '99 and that was terrible.
T
Tiernan
Posts: 13,021
Nov 14, 2011 7:51am
Week in and week out ND is a better team than OSU this year. The next two weeks are both winnable for the Bucks but the Defensive inconsistencies so far would indicate a loss in at least one of them. We all know which one we would prefer that be if its going to happen.
Rotinaj
Posts: 7,699
Nov 14, 2011 7:52am
sportswizuhrd;971706 wrote:The leading rusher for Purdue in the ND game did not play in the OSU game...
Sleeper doesnt have time 2 look up the facts. Hes 2 busy running his businesses and banging hoezzz.karen lotz;971718 wrote:Also, Notre Dame played at Purdue too.
j_crazy
Posts: 8,372
Nov 14, 2011 5:08pm
Rotinaj;972197 wrote:Sleeper doesnt have time 2 look up the facts. Hes 2 busy running his businesses and banging hoezzz.
Not to mention making mass orders for iPad 2s.
sleeper
Posts: 27,879
Nov 14, 2011 5:46pm
Interesting. Purdue has great depth at running back.sportswizuhrd;971706 wrote:The leading rusher for Purdue in the ND game did not play in the OSU game...
sleeper
Posts: 27,879
Nov 14, 2011 5:48pm
It's all relative I suppose.darbypitcher22;971767 wrote:Must be forgetting about that 6-6 debacle we had in '99, or the back to back 4-6-1 and 6-4-1 campaigns of '88 and '87 respectively...