Sykotyk
Posts: 1,155
Nov 10, 2011 8:44pm
The problem with a case like this is there is no 'physical evidence'. It's just circumstantial testimony by the victims, McQueary, the janitors (the one who saw it is no suffering dementia and not fit for trial), JoePa, the AD, the police from the one investigation, the prosecutor who felt at the time there wasn't enough evidence to go on, etc.
There is no, and please excuse me for this term, "DNA Evidence" of Sandusky's on anything incriminating. But, when seven boys over varying time frames all give very eerily similar stories of how he preyed upon them. It's hard to believe it's just one big conspiracy. Especially with McQueary's testimony, the fact Sandusky was told to stop bring children onto campus (why would they need to give that rule unless way back then there was the belief that this could at least be true). And, this wasn't a recent allegation. These were made several times over years. He just finally had somebody do the right thing and call the police when they found out a child was said to be assaulted by Sandusky.
Something that should've happened in 2002. And didn't.
There is no, and please excuse me for this term, "DNA Evidence" of Sandusky's on anything incriminating. But, when seven boys over varying time frames all give very eerily similar stories of how he preyed upon them. It's hard to believe it's just one big conspiracy. Especially with McQueary's testimony, the fact Sandusky was told to stop bring children onto campus (why would they need to give that rule unless way back then there was the belief that this could at least be true). And, this wasn't a recent allegation. These were made several times over years. He just finally had somebody do the right thing and call the police when they found out a child was said to be assaulted by Sandusky.
Something that should've happened in 2002. And didn't.
Ty Webb
Posts: 2,798
Nov 10, 2011 9:48pm
Is this the same Mark Madden who worked for WCW in the late 90s
Fab1b
Posts: 12,949
Nov 10, 2011 9:50pm
Per SportsCenter alert on my phone: McQueary will not attend Nebraska game
B
bigkahuna
Posts: 4,454
Nov 10, 2011 10:00pm
But it's for his safety because he has been threatened. He shouldn't be attending the game because he should be fired.
killer_ewok
Posts: 11,379
Nov 11, 2011 6:36am
Ty Webb;967338 wrote:Is this the same Mark Madden who worked for WCW in the late 90s
Yes.
bases_loaded
Posts: 6,912
Nov 11, 2011 7:49am
KR1245;967061 wrote:Madden is going to be on Anderson Cooper tonight to discuss this, he must be pretty confident
You must not be familiar with madden. He's confident about everything that comes out of his mouth. You're wrong he's right, click
Skyhook79
Posts: 5,739
Nov 11, 2011 9:44am
Yeah really, the BOT are concerned for McQueary's safety so they take him out of the situation. The Grand Jury testimony happened a year ago and the BOT and prosecutors did nothing for 11 months of removing Sandusky's emeritus status and arresting him back then with all the damning testimony they had and protecting future victims.bigkahuna;967357 wrote:But it's for his safety because he has been threatened. He shouldn't be attending the game because he should be fired.
T
Tiernan
Posts: 13,021
Nov 11, 2011 10:56am
^
First intelligent thing you've said in two days. Some BOT heads need to roll too.
First intelligent thing you've said in two days. Some BOT heads need to roll too.