W
wgh raider
Posts: 121
Nov 7, 2011 1:53am
no way a ravens team with really no outside spped guys should drive 92 yards for a TD. the last time the steelers had the ball before the last 8 seconds they called a terrible play on 3rd and 4. you have great field position and you dump a ball off to mwelde moore. throw the ball downfield.
Heelz
Posts: 780
Nov 7, 2011 6:17am
Good game but the Ravens pulled out the broom, there is always a shit ton of questionable calls in this series. Monday is good for me, hope everyone enjoys looking at my Ravens shirt today
DeyDurkie5
Posts: 11,324
Nov 7, 2011 8:59am
DeyDurkie5;955406 wrote:ravens will continue their dominance of the steelers this year. I say they win by a field goal.
Automatik;955950 wrote:You heard it folks.
Bet the farm on Pittsburgh! :laugh:
Automatik;956229 wrote:There's that stellar NFL insight again. :laugh:
In recent years, Pittsburgh has always been able to pressure Flacco and get into his head. That should be the primary concern. Fuck him up, let him that that "oh shit" look early and we should win.
Automatik;956277 wrote:No shit sherlock. That's why I said it should be their goal. When they do pressure him they have success...and they didn't in the first matchup and look at the outcome.
DeyDurkie5;960086 wrote:ravens win. non jerks off using his own tears tonight.
hehehehNon;960527 wrote:Heading down about 5.
Going to be a late night that's the only drawback. Took a PTO day tomorrow, though.
Plenty of time to party after the Steelers victory!
like_that
Posts: 26,625
Nov 7, 2011 9:05am
Solid win for the Ravens. Not surprised by the win though as they clearly are the superior team this season. The game probably should have been a bigger win for the Ravens, but the Steelers had some confidence and home field during a night game. If the refs stayed out of the game though, the Ravens win by at least 10.
What kind of adjustments do you think the Steelers defense needs to make as they clearly are not the same defense as they were in years past (as indicated by the final drive)?
What kind of adjustments do you think the Steelers defense needs to make as they clearly are not the same defense as they were in years past (as indicated by the final drive)?
Commander of Awesome
Posts: 23,151
Nov 7, 2011 9:08am
It's really amazing the plays that Ray Lewis is still making. His game changing strip sack was a great play. Really turned the game for the Ravens. Just a testament to the fact that you can't win with a suspect offensive line. I would think the Steelers remember this and draft some protection for their QB.
Non
Posts: 9,517
Nov 7, 2011 9:11am
Steelers are 6-3 still. A lot to play for.DeyDurkie5;961775 wrote:heheheh
Browns are done at the midseason mark. So yeah...heheheh
Rough game last night. A lot of what ifs. Both teams had their chances, Baltimore made the plays this time. I give them credit. Steelers have won many games like that before.
Despite the loss last night, I ask this question...Can the Steelers win the AFC this year?...I say absolutely. Baltimore might be the best team at this point and they barely won that game with the Steelers playing without LaMarr Woodley and Emmanuel Sanders.
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Nov 7, 2011 9:12am
Corners that can cover 1 on 1 and a free safety that can play the passlike_that;961780 wrote: What kind of adjustments do you think the Steelers defense needs to make as they clearly are not the same defense as they were in years past (as indicated by the final drive)?
like_that
Posts: 26,625
Nov 7, 2011 9:17am
I don't see it happening. Baltimore is the much better team, especially when they are at home. I also don't know if the Steelers will be able to handle the Jets defense the way they are playing. Hell that o line might be destroyed by the Bengals defense next week. A lot is going to need to go the Steelers way for them to win the AFC.Non;961784 wrote:Despite the loss last night, I ask this question...Can the Steelers win the AFC this year?...I say absolutely. Baltimore might be the best team at this point and they barely won that game with the Steelers playing without LaMarr Woodley and Emmanuel Sanders.
Those would be good adjustments, but it sounds like those adjustments are only made through the draft and FA.LJ;961785 wrote:Corners that can cover 1 on 1 and a free safety that can play the pass
Automatik
Posts: 14,632
Nov 7, 2011 9:20am
Hats off to Flacco on that last drive.
I thought after the quick 3 and out Baltimore would pack it in. Pittsburgh's D was attacking and I thought it was in the bag.
People can whine about the calls all they want, but the refs didn't drive it 92 yards to win it. The blame can go all around from Tomlin to the players....that is unacceptable.
I thought after the quick 3 and out Baltimore would pack it in. Pittsburgh's D was attacking and I thought it was in the bag.
People can whine about the calls all they want, but the refs didn't drive it 92 yards to win it. The blame can go all around from Tomlin to the players....that is unacceptable.
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Nov 7, 2011 9:21am
Yeha not gonna happen this year. It's obvious that Baltimore has exploited the issue this year. It becomes pretty obvious when you see the stat that 84% of first downs by gain for the Ravens against the Steelers this year have been by the pass. :thumbdown:like_that;961787 wrote:
Those would be good adjustments, but it sounds like those adjustments are only made through the draft and FA.
It was also glaring against the Packers in the Super Bowl. Max protect, put out 3 fast receivers, and you can work downfield all fucking day
like_that
Posts: 26,625
Nov 7, 2011 9:22am
I didn't think Flacco was capable of producing a game winning drive like that. That might be the drive that could change his career.Automatik;961788 wrote:Hats off to Flacco on that last drive.
I thought after the quick 3 and out Baltimore would pack it in. Pittsburgh's D was attacking and I thought it was in the bag.
People can whine about the calls all they want, but the refs didn't drive it 92 yards to win it. The blame can go all around from Tomlin to the players....that is unacceptable.
DeyDurkie5
Posts: 11,324
Nov 7, 2011 9:22am
hahhaahh steelers aren't all non had them out to be. nice try though, i'm sure the steelers will "dominate" the rest of the schedule like they were supposed to with the ravens last night. by the way, did I not say ravens by a field goal? hmmm I think I did.Non;961784 wrote:Steelers are 6-3 still. A lot to play for.
Browns are done at the midseason mark. So yeah...heheheh
Rough game last night. A lot of what ifs. Both teams had their chances, Baltimore made the plays this time. I give them credit. Steelers have won many games like that before.
Despite the loss last night, I ask this question...Can the Steelers win the AFC this year?...I say absolutely. Baltimore might be the best team at this point and they barely won that game with the Steelers playing without LaMarr Woodley and Emmanuel Sanders.
Non
Posts: 9,517
Nov 7, 2011 9:22am
Ok I know you're trolling but this is ridiculous.like_that;961780 wrote:If the refs stayed out of the game though, the Ravens win by at least 10.
Ravens definitely got the benefit of the officiating in this game. Steelers still should've been able to stop a 92-yard drive. I'm not making this an officials cost us the game theme but clearly Ray Lewis led with the helmet...that should've been called. Then the officials gave the Ravens a borderline helmet hit which led to a field goal before halftime. They also got a gift touchdown on another borderline pass interference...the kind of handfighting that happens all game long, there is much worse that doesn't get called.
I think Baltimore is a better team this year but if they're the best team in the AFC at this point I like the Steelers chances. It's not out of the question that the Steelers can get healthier and stronger and comeback and beat them in the playoffs. They've won big games in Baltimore before.
DeyDurkie5
Posts: 11,324
Nov 7, 2011 9:23am
did yo bet the house on the steelers? you would've lost.Automatik;961788 wrote:Hats off to Flacco on that last drive.
I thought after the quick 3 and out Baltimore would pack it in. Pittsburgh's D was attacking and I thought it was in the bag.
People can whine about the calls all they want, but the refs didn't drive it 92 yards to win it. The blame can go all around from Tomlin to the players....that is unacceptable.
Non
Posts: 9,517
Nov 7, 2011 9:26am
Actually, I know you expected them to lose to New England and Baltimore.DeyDurkie5;961792 wrote:hahhaahh steelers aren't all non had them out to be. nice try though, i'm sure the steelers will "dominate" the rest of the schedule like they were supposed to with the ravens last night. by the way, did I not say ravens by a field goal? hmmm I think I did.
They beat New England and were right there against Baltimore, a game that could've gone either way.
I feel better about the Steelers chances than I did earlier in the season. I never said they were guaranteed to win it all. I think they're one of the teams that have a legit chance to represent the AFC in the Super Bowl. They should be in the playoffs and at least playing in the divisional round, possibly against Baltimore again.
like_that
Posts: 26,625
Nov 7, 2011 9:26am
Whenever the Steelers lose, you always say the other team recieved all the calls. In your eyes the Steelers should only have 3 losses in the past 3 years if it wasn't for the officials.Non;961794 wrote:Ok I know you're trolling but this is ridiculous.
Ravens definitely got the benefit of the officiating in this game. Steelers still should've been able to stop a 92-yard drive. I'm not making this an officials cost us the game theme but clearly Ray Lewis led with the helmet...that should've been called. Then the officials gave the Ravens a borderline helmet hit which led to a field goal before halftime. They also got a gift touchdown on another borderline pass interference...the kind of handfighting that happens all game long, there is much worse that doesn't get called.
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Nov 7, 2011 9:28am
I thought there were some shitty calls, but they definitely went both ways. Somehting would be called on the Ravens, but not on the Steelers. Called on the Steelers but not on the Ravens. Odd calls on the reviews both ways.
Definitely officiated interestingly.
Definitely officiated interestingly.
Non
Posts: 9,517
Nov 7, 2011 9:33am
No. Only the Jets game last year in the regular season. I thought the Jets cornerbacks were allowed to hold on the final drive. The holds in that game were much worse than the pass interference on Ike Taylor last night that gave Baltimore the ball right at the goal line.like_that;961800 wrote:Whenever the Steelers lose, you always say the other team recieved all the calls. In your eyes the Steelers should only have 3 losses in the past 3 years if it wasn't for the officials.
I don't care which team you're a fan of, you have to push for consistency on the helmet hits. Lewis' hit was much more clearly a helmet hit than the one Ryan Clark delivered. They should be able to review those plays and if it's a helmet hit they should throw the flag...rather than just give out a fine on Tuesday.
Automatik
Posts: 14,632
Nov 7, 2011 9:33am
I don't gamble. Congrats....you got one right...everyone knows about the blind squirrel. :laugh:DeyDurkie5;961795 wrote:did yo bet the house on the steelers? you would've lost.
Automatik
Posts: 14,632
Nov 7, 2011 9:34am
I saw the Lewis hit in the highlights. It blows my mind that it wasn't flagged, yet the Clark hit was. You either flag them both, or not at all.
Non
Posts: 9,517
Nov 7, 2011 9:37am
Just to be clear, I'm not saying the officials cost the Steelers this game.
The Steelers had plenty of chances. Larry Foote had his hand on the ball on that final drive. An interception would've sealed the game.
Flacco was clutch and Baltimore deserves credit for getting the win. The Steelers have won games like that against Baltimore. Ravens did it this time.
However....there's no way the Steelers got the benefit of the officiating and that's the reason why they were close. If any team benefited more last night it was Baltimore.
The Steelers had plenty of chances. Larry Foote had his hand on the ball on that final drive. An interception would've sealed the game.
Flacco was clutch and Baltimore deserves credit for getting the win. The Steelers have won games like that against Baltimore. Ravens did it this time.
However....there's no way the Steelers got the benefit of the officiating and that's the reason why they were close. If any team benefited more last night it was Baltimore.
like_that
Posts: 26,625
Nov 7, 2011 9:39am
Of course they did. The Steelers never lose without the other team getting help.
I agree about Lewis, but do you have that same view with Harrison's hits last year, since he didn't get penalized on both of them? I don't recall you bitching about that.
I agree about Lewis, but do you have that same view with Harrison's hits last year, since he didn't get penalized on both of them? I don't recall you bitching about that.
Non
Posts: 9,517
Nov 7, 2011 9:41am
For example, on the Lewis hit, they reviewed the play anyway to see if Ward made the catch.
While the official is looking at it again, I don't see the problem with realizing it was a helmet hit and penalizing for it right there.
The game moves fast...ok they missed it in live action...but you clearly saw it was so get it right.
While the official is looking at it again, I don't see the problem with realizing it was a helmet hit and penalizing for it right there.
The game moves fast...ok they missed it in live action...but you clearly saw it was so get it right.
Automatik
Posts: 14,632
Nov 7, 2011 9:43am
I recall the majority bitching that the calls were inconsistent, which they are. I've learned to just deal with it...its part of the game now.like_that;961810 wrote: I agree about Lewis, but do you have that same view with Harrison's hits last year, since he didn't get penalized on both of them? I don't recall you bitching about that.
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Nov 7, 2011 9:47am
Did anyone see the "helmet to helmet" in the Dolphins-Chiefs game? :laugh: