DeyDurkie5;960078 wrote:after you guys were claiming dominance, you squeak out a touchdown victory. I do give reps to the avatar/sig selection. Just be glad notre dame didn't lose, i had a great one up my sleeve.
hah reps indeed for manning up.
Notre Dame certainly didn't look pretty, and I was expecting them to look damn good. I thought Wake was a bunch of frauds, but maybe they aren't. They did beat Florida State.
dlazz;960248 wrote:Notre Lame barely beat a "bad" Wake Forest team.
another year, another mediocre Irish team.
I don't think Wake Forest is a bad team, I think they're very average and played their A game. I think Notre Dame played their C+ game, and the injuries on defense (Te'o and the entire DL all out, using third-string DE's and LB's at DE to compensate) definitely showed.
But, and since you don't know a lot about football I am indeed asking this seriously....you do realize college football teams are extremely capricious and you shouldn't take much out of one game, right? Look at these scores:
2002: OSU vs Cinci 23-19; OSU vs NW 27-16; OSU vs Purdue 10-6, OSU vs Illinois 23-16.
2003: OSU vs SDSU 16-13; OSU vs BGSU 24-17; OSU vs Purdue 16-13
2004: OSU vs Marshall 24-12; OSU vs NCSt 22-14;
2006: OSU vs Illinois 17-10
2008: OSU vs Ohio 26-14; OSU vs Illinois 30-20
2009: OSU vs Navy 31-27
2010: OSU vs Illinois 24-13
It happened to every team every team where there is a case in which they don't dominate an inferior opponent. And after each case there is a naysayer who doesn't know what he's talking about. In this instance, it is you.