data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/da226/da226623a910db13449c264ab3d953bffc68537e" alt="Ironman92's avatar"
Ironman92
Posts: 49,363
Oct 30, 2011 12:14am
Stanford wins....Stanford sucks...not really.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/10442/10442d6aba5ea77022128cea36db0ac2c8a2dcc3" alt="GoJPM!'s avatar"
GoJPM!
Posts: 799
Oct 30, 2011 12:15am
And Volunteer fans everwhere rejoice! lol
IggyPride00
Posts: 6,482
Oct 30, 2011 12:21am
That Stanford win may have saved the BCS, because when Oklahoma beats OK St, the Alabama/LSU winner would have been the likely last unbeaten team other than Boise.
If Stanford beats Oregon (who they have at home) that will likely secure them a spot in the BCS title game now.
If Stanford beats Oregon (who they have at home) that will likely secure them a spot in the BCS title game now.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/279a9/279a9beece8a805c9ce152c8e21c36ed6b0b938b" alt="LJ's avatar"
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Oct 30, 2011 12:34am
IggyPride00;950411 wrote:That Stanford win may have saved the BCS, because when Oklahoma beats OK St, the Alabama/LSU winner would have been the likely last unbeaten team other than Boise.
If Stanford beats Oregon (who they have at home) that will likely secure them a spot in the BCS title game now.
Okie St beats OU this year. Bank it
IggyPride00
Posts: 6,482
Oct 30, 2011 12:35am
OK st. to me is Mich st. type team that can't handle prosperity and always finds a way to screw it up. Until proven otherwise they are the beneficiaries of a cupcake schedule thus far that is making them look better than they are.LJ;950424 wrote:Okie St beats OU this year. Bank it
S
Sonofanump
Oct 30, 2011 10:51am
Looked to me that there approx a half second (.5) when the runner was down in bounds. Reaction time is stated to be 1.5 seconds. No way the coach called timeout in the time period between the ball being dead and the clock expiring.
G
gport_tennis
Posts: 1,796
Oct 30, 2011 11:40am
I'm ok with how regulation ended. It was too close too overrule. You would think kidding would coach a little better and tell his boys to get down asap.
Sent from my ADR6400L using Tapatalk
Sent from my ADR6400L using Tapatalk
T
Tiernan
Posts: 13,021
Oct 31, 2011 9:13am
Kiffin's face when that ball popped out should be on a poster that says "...damn somethin' just went up me bum mum!"
T
Tiernan
Posts: 13,021
Nov 1, 2011 10:30am
The little dipshit got fined $10K by the PAC 12 today for criticizing the officials Sat night. Maybe the worst HC hire in CFB since Brian Kelly got the job at ND.
S
Sonofanump
Nov 1, 2011 10:46am
"He has said he was promised by side judge Brad Glenn that he'd be awarded a timeout if it was ruled that receiver Robert Woods was tackled inbounds with one second left in the game."
1) He told the official that Robert Woods was going to be thrown the ball prior to the play?
2) The tackle was completed with less than one second on the clock, so does that make your statement non applicable?
DB- The officials will look to you to call timeout after the play, it is not automatic timeout with the end of the play.
1) He told the official that Robert Woods was going to be thrown the ball prior to the play?
2) The tackle was completed with less than one second on the clock, so does that make your statement non applicable?
DB- The officials will look to you to call timeout after the play, it is not automatic timeout with the end of the play.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/952f4/952f48c68a77f58aaa2b184e42d03f71935c97c7" alt="karen lotz's avatar"
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Nov 1, 2011 10:48am
From his post game presser, he was talking about his conversation with the official during the replay. So he said he was told that if it is determined by replay Woods' knee was down with 1 second on the clock, he would be awarded the timeout.
S
Sonofanump
Nov 1, 2011 11:21am
Thanks.