I don't normally agree with you, but THIS.karen lotz;960158 wrote:Compare the OSU/Michigan State game this year to Bama/LSU. You don't think people are able to tell a difference?
Who else should they throw at LSU then? They already beat Oregon.sleeper;960166 wrote:I actually hope LSU wins out so they can be exposed for the fraud they are against a real team.
Even though I think LSU would prolly win, I'd like to see them play Oklahoma for the NC. To me, that's the only team (other than 'Bama) that can hang with them long enough to have a chance to win.like_that;960557 wrote:Who else should they throw at LSU then? They already beat Oregon.
IF LSU beats Arkansas, that will be 3 top 10 teams they beat. How can someone argue against that?like_that;960557 wrote:
Who else should they throw at LSU then? They already beat Oregon.
I just don't see that, especially after their defense got torched by TTU on their own turf. I am not even sure if OKL will beat OKL ST.vball10set;960562 wrote:Even though I think LSU would prolly win, I'd like to see them play Oklahoma for the NC. To me, that's the only team (other than 'Bama) that can hang with them long enough to have a chance to win.
No one is saying that they aren't the best team. They're saying due to the extremely pathetic showing on offense yesterday they're vulnerable against more complete teams.cats gone wild;960563 wrote:IF LSU beats Arkansas, that will be 3 top 10 teams they beat. How can someone argue against that?
Nobody is going to be more complete on defense than Alabama. Translation: Nobody else is going to be able to hold LSU to 9 pts.lhslep134;960571 wrote:No one is saying that they aren't the best team. They're saying due to the extremely pathetic showing on offense yesterday they're vulnerable against more complete teams.
I took that into account, but I think OK just had a real bad day against TT. Now, if OK St beats them, then I'll rethink my position, but for now, OK's the only team that can (other than 'Bama), IMO, give them a game.like_that;960570 wrote:I just don't see that, especially after their defense got torched by TTU on their own turf. I am not even sure if OKL will beat OKL ST.
You don't think Stanford could hold LSU to a low enough point total that Andrew Luck could put up enough points to win?like_that;960576 wrote:Nobody is going to be more complete on defense than Alabama. Translation: Nobody else is going to be able to hold LSU to 9 pts.
No, I really don' think they can. I don't even think Stanford will beat Oregon next saturday. You should at least wait until that game is over to make your assessment on how Stanford would do against LSU.lhslep134;960579 wrote:You don't think Stanford could hold LSU to a low enough point total that Andrew Luck could put up enough points to win?
If you don't, then we disagree and that's that.
We might. Not from me. Regardless, Alabama would be a TD favorite over Boise if that match-up occurs.Skyhook79;960355 wrote:No If Boise St beat Alabama in that scenario people would just say Alabama didn't care about that game because they were disappointed not being in the NC game just like when Alabama was stomped by Utah in the Sugar Bowl in 2009. Many people used that excuse.
You have your opinion, I have mine. Through 10 weeks, I think Stanford would beat LSU. Not sold on LSU's offense.like_that;960594 wrote:No, I really don' think they can. I don't even think Stanford will beat Oregon next saturday. You should at least wait until that game is over to make your assessment on how Stanford would do against LSU.
why do you post on this site?cats gone wild;960563 wrote:IF LSU beats Arkansas, that will be 3 top 10 teams they beat. How can someone argue against that?
What if Stanford loses to Oregon?lhslep134;960620 wrote:You have your opinion, I have mine. Through 10 weeks, I think Stanford would beat LSU. Not sold on LSU's offense.
Stanford has one win over a current ranked team (bottom of the pack ranked team), while LSU has 3 wins over currently ranked teams and 2 are in the top 10. Yeah, Stanford has proven alot this year. The only decent opponent Stanford has played, they won in OT with USC getting ripped off on the last play of regulation. What makes you think Stanford is good besides a QB? Do you even watch Stanford games?lhslep134;960620 wrote:You have your opinion, I have mine. Through 10 weeks, I think Stanford would beat LSU. Not sold on LSU's offense.
Then I would obviously no longer consider Stanford to be better than LSU.like_that;960636 wrote:What if Stanford loses to Oregon?
Stupid? Its a relevant question since Oregon would be a comment opponent of both LSU/Stanford. It's not like I am making random hypothetical scenarios where one or the other the team loses to any other team. Not surprised you didn't realize that.lhslep134;960667 wrote:Then I would obviously no longer consider Stanford to be better than LSU.
What if LSU loses to Arkansas? Same stupid pointless question that you asked me.
It's not a relevant question. You're asking my thoughts about a team after a loss that hasn't happened yet and how it would affect my opinion of them, when my current opinion of them is due to them being undefeated.like_that;960686 wrote:Stupid? Its a relevant question since Oregon would be a comment opponent of both LSU/Stanford.
cats gone wild;960655 wrote: The only decent opponent Stanford has played [. . .] Do you even watch Stanford games?
It's the only argument you can use in college football, since there is no playoff system. That is how these idiots base their rankings. This is why the BCS is a joke.Pick6;960864 wrote:Team A beat team B. So if Team B beats team C than team A must be better than team C!!
This is an argument idiots use.