karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Oct 22, 2011 11:48pm
The bcs is imploding. Oklahoma its getting beat down
dwccrew
Posts: 7,817
Oct 22, 2011 11:50pm
I like that there is finally some upsets. I feel like there haven't been very many this season.karen lotz;941956 wrote:The bcs is imploding. Oklahoma its getting beat down
jordo212000
Posts: 10,664
Oct 22, 2011 11:56pm
dwccrew;941957 wrote: I feel like there haven't been very many this season.
Exactly what I said earlier to one of friends
killer_ewok
Posts: 11,379
Oct 23, 2011 12:04am
Incredible.
krambman
Posts: 3,606
Oct 23, 2011 12:28am
Umm, I think that you're confused. All of these teams winning out would have been the BCS imploding. Having teams that are undefeated this late in the season lose is a good thing for the BCS.karen lotz;941956 wrote:The bcs is imploding. Oklahoma its getting beat down
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Oct 23, 2011 12:30am
Sorry, the teams near the top the bcs are imploding.
krambman
Posts: 3,606
Oct 23, 2011 12:31am
That's better.karen lotz;942006 wrote:Sorry, the teams near the top the bcs are imploding.
Mulva
Posts: 13,650
Oct 23, 2011 12:31am
It depends who loses in my opinion. A great anti-BCS scenario would be something like Clemson, Boise State, and Stanford going undefeated with an SEC and Big 12 team each having 1 loss. Then what?krambman;942004 wrote:Umm, I think that you're confused. All of these teams winning out would have been the BCS imploding. Having teams that are undefeated this late in the season lose is a good thing for the BCS.
krambman
Posts: 3,606
Oct 23, 2011 12:32am
Also, nice job moving a similar thread with a more interesting title into a thread you created with a boring title.
krambman
Posts: 3,606
Oct 23, 2011 12:33am
Then the two highest ranked teams in the BCS (likely the SEC and Big XII teams) still play in the title game. People would complain (especially Clemson and Stanford), but the two teams ranked at the top would still face each other in the title game.Mulva;942009 wrote:It depends who loses in my opinion. A great anti-BCS scenario would be something like Clemson, Boise State, and Stanford going undefeated with an SEC and Big 12 team each having 1 loss. Then what?
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Oct 23, 2011 12:35am
krambman;942010 wrote:Also, nice job moving a similar thread with a more interesting title into a thread you created with a boring title.
Is this directed at me? I can't merge threads, I think I started this one before the other one bc I was on my phone. You are awfully testy tonight.
Mulva
Posts: 13,650
Oct 23, 2011 12:36am
^ Which would have the BCS imploding in my opinion. I don't think teams losing is necessarily a bad thing for anyone who is hoping to mess up the system, as long as the right teams are losing.
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Oct 23, 2011 9:11am
lol u mad?krambman;942010 wrote:Also, nice job moving a similar thread with a more interesting title into a thread you created with a boring title.
jordo212000
Posts: 10,664
Oct 23, 2011 9:15am
If a 1-loss SEC or Big 12 team gets in over an undefeated Clemson, the system is broken. Clemson had a decent OOC schedule and the ACC isn't bad to the point that you should penalize them.krambman;942011 wrote:Then the two highest ranked teams in the BCS (likely the SEC and Big XII teams) still play in the title game. People would complain (especially Clemson and Stanford), but the two teams ranked at the top would still face each other in the title game.
With all that being said though, Clemson will not go unbeaten IMO
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Oct 23, 2011 9:18am
The BCS is strategically designed to put the two best teams in the title game...if it claims a 1loss team deserves it over an undefeated team, then so be it.
B
bigorangebuck22
Posts: 186
Oct 23, 2011 9:30am
MSU reminds me of OSU in '02... average offense, much better defense, and a holy buckeye/holy spartan moment
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Oct 23, 2011 9:32am
...but they have a lossbigorangebuck22;942140 wrote:MSU reminds me of OSU in '02... average offense, much better defense, and a holy buckeye/holy spartan moment
Soooo....
sleeper
Posts: 27,879
Oct 23, 2011 11:04am
B1G football. Best in the country.
ts1227
Posts: 12,319
Oct 23, 2011 11:07am
krambman;942010 wrote:Also, nice job moving a similar thread with a more interesting title into a thread you created with a boring title.
I merged them last night because all 3 were about the same thing. The merged thread takes the name of the first one created unless you tell it differently. someone has since edited the title, though.
Fly4Fun
Posts: 7,730
Oct 23, 2011 11:27am
I edited to the title something a bit more descriptive.
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Oct 23, 2011 11:32am
Again, my deepest apologies to anyone who was offended by the title of the thread last night. I posted from my phone right after the play occurred, before the review overturned the call. I hope you are able to recover mentally from such an egregious error.
wes_mantooth
Posts: 17,977
Oct 23, 2011 11:34am
karen lotz;942221 wrote:Again, my deepest apologies to anyone who was offended by the title of the thread last night. I posted from my phone right after the play occurred, before the review overturned the call. I hope you are able to recover mentally from such an egregious error.
You die! You die and you go to hell!
justincredible
Posts: 32,056
Oct 23, 2011 11:39am
krambman;942010 wrote:Also, nice job moving a similar thread with a more interesting title into a thread you created with a boring title.
This is an awesome thing to complain about.
DeyDurkie5
Posts: 11,324
Oct 23, 2011 11:45am
also, go fuck yourselfkrambman;942010 wrote:Also, nice job moving a similar thread with a more interesting title into a thread you created with a boring title.
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Oct 23, 2011 1:16pm
Lol the more you read that post the more hilarious it gets..."with a more interesting thread title" LOL like he sat there and goes "hmm this is one interesting thread ti--WHAT THE FUCK WHO MOVED THAT INTERESTING THREAD TITLE??!!!"