karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Oct 8, 2011 6:46pm
I called it first. Check the Heisman thread...
jordo212000
Posts: 10,664
Oct 8, 2011 6:58pm
karen lotz;926614 wrote:I called it first. Check the Heisman thread...
I gotta give you some dap for that.
Speedofsand
Posts: 5,529
Oct 8, 2011 7:48pm
I feel much better since F$U and Miami both also lost today. I knew this game was over yesterday when Driskel was in a boot.
Pick6
Posts: 14,946
Oct 8, 2011 7:57pm
florida football...wooooSpeedofsand;926686 wrote:I feel much better since F$U and Miami both also lost today. I knew this game was over yesterday when Driskel was in a boot.
atleast FIU beat akron, barely
j_crazy
Posts: 8,372
Oct 8, 2011 7:59pm
Speedofsand;926686 wrote:I feel much better since F$U and Miami both also lost today. I knew this game was over yesterday when Driskel was in a boot.
Uf wasn't good enough today. 1 player would not have changed that.
C
cats gone wild
Posts: 2,651
Oct 8, 2011 8:29pm
Yes you did.karen lotz;926614 wrote:I called it first. Check the Heisman thread...
But, as I said after you......they wont give it to a defensive player no matter how good he is.
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Oct 8, 2011 8:36pm
UF wouldn't have made this close with Driskel, they wouldn't have made it close with Brantley.Speedofsand;926686 wrote:I feel much better since F$U and Miami both also lost today. I knew this game was over yesterday when Driskel was in a boot.
LSU>>>>>>>UF (and 95% of college football teams)
Pick6
Posts: 14,946
Oct 8, 2011 8:37pm
I'd go 99 or 100%, but they are due to choke once this season.SportsAndLady;926802 wrote:UF wouldn't have made this close with Driskel, they wouldn't have made it close with Brantley.
LSU>>>>>>>UF (and 95% of college football teams)
C
cats gone wild
Posts: 2,651
Oct 8, 2011 8:37pm
So, you are saying there are around 7 teams better than LSU?SportsAndLady;926802 wrote:.
LSU>>>>>>>UF (and 95% of college football teams)
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Oct 8, 2011 8:39pm
Figured you wouldn't get that.
LSU>100% of college football teams
LSU>>>>>>>>95% of college football teams (where UF is included)
LSU>100% of college football teams
LSU>>>>>>>>95% of college football teams (where UF is included)
j_crazy
Posts: 8,372
Oct 8, 2011 8:49pm
Pick6;926807 wrote:I'd go 99 or 100%, but they are due to choke once this season.
If they beat bama and Arkansas they'll run the table. Bama is just good and Arkansas just gets up for the LSU rivalry more than LSU.
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Oct 8, 2011 8:53pm
p.s. LSU's defense doesn't have squat on Rutgers' D
S
Sonofanump
Oct 8, 2011 11:38pm
Wow, someone does not get it.Classyposter58;926456 wrote:Another reason these schools should leave the NCAA. The organization is a total joke
Who do you think make these rules?
Jughead
Posts: 1,261
Oct 9, 2011 12:32am
I applaud the SEC officials for actually enforcing a rule, no matter how stupid it is. It was the last thing I expected from SEC refs.tk421;926446 wrote:Les Miles just punked Florida with a sweet fake punt TD, and they brought it back because of taunting before the kicker crossed the goal line. What a stupid rule and a terrible call.
B
bogey
Posts: 99
Oct 9, 2011 8:04am
Great call - STUPID rule!!! I applaud the men in stripes for enforcing a rule that they have been told to enforce. I can't imagine taking the boos from the LSU faithfull after enforcing one of the dumbest rules ever instituted by some guys in suits and ties. I think they are trying to hard to take the human element out of all officiating and it's just not good in all cases. Replay to help correct a possible mistake on a touchdown catch or something like that is good, but I think the officials could be given a little lattitude in deciding when "taunting" should be called and when it shouldn't. For crying out loud, calling it on a punter who just converted a fake on his own call and took it to the house???? Give me a break.
S
Sonofanump
Oct 9, 2011 8:50am
Those some guys that make up these rules and want to take the human element out of the game are who?bogey;927536 wrote:instituted by some guys in suits and ties. I think they are trying to hard to take the human element out of all officiating and it's just not good in all cases.
I bet you know their names.
Rotinaj
Posts: 7,699
Oct 9, 2011 8:54am
What does this mean?Jughead;927445 wrote:I applaud the SEC officials for actually enforcing a rule, no matter how stupid it is. It was the last thing I expected from SEC refs.
j_crazy
Posts: 8,372
Oct 9, 2011 9:15am
I'm pretty sure les miles was in favor of the rule. As were most coaches. Fans think its stupid but if coaches are okay with it I don't feel sorry for taking away points.
E
enigmaax
Posts: 4,511
Oct 9, 2011 10:37am
Hate the celebration rule anyway. In this particular example, I feel like, if you've put yourself in position to be taunted by the punter, perhaps you should find a new game to play. The last two weeks haven't been fun. The next two might not be much better.
S
Sonofanump
Oct 9, 2011 11:51am
Obviously most coaches were in favor of it since they (the coaches) are the persons who make up the rules. Not the NCAA, not the officials.j_crazy;927568 wrote:I'm pretty sure les miles was in favor of the rule. As were most coaches. Fans think its stupid but if coaches are okay with it I don't feel sorry for taking away points.
Hb31187
Posts: 8,534
Oct 9, 2011 11:52am
Yeah the rule is stupid, dont like someone taunting then stop em. This isnt pop warner, nobody needs their hand held because someone showed em up
S
Sonofanump
Oct 9, 2011 11:53am
What he might mean is: SEC officials are not as strict as other conference officials, especially the B1G.Rotinaj;927561 wrote:What does this mean?
Rotinaj
Posts: 7,699
Oct 9, 2011 12:57pm
Sonofanump;927658 wrote:What he might mean is: SEC officials are not as strict as other conference officials, especially the B1G.
Is this a fact?
S
Sonofanump
Oct 9, 2011 1:09pm
Empirical evidence would support this statement.Rotinaj;927719 wrote:Is this a fact?